Примеры использования Judge ruled на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The judge ruled that the cargo should be returned to the haulier.
Charges were filed against Rose, but a judge ruled that he did not directly incite the riot.
The judge ruled that you will go back with your parents.
But ordinary users started using them to bypass copyright monitors, and eventually a judge ruled that this had become their principal use in actual practice.
The judge ruled that Waldemar should replace the author as Capital's liquidator.
But ordinary users started using them to bypass copyright monitors,and eventually a judge ruled that this had become their principal use in actual practice.
The judge ruled that condoms could be legally advertised and sold for the prevention of disease.
The application to the High Court for judicial review of the decision to remove the author was examined and the trial Judge ruled that the decisions to remove the author were reasonable in the administrative law sense.
The judge ruled that the activities of this organization does not comply with the federal law on freedom of religion.
The pathologist testified that the deceased died sometime between 25 and28 July 1988. The judge ruled that the deceased died on 25 July 1988(the day the author had accompanied D. T. and K. G. to the deceased's house), thereby implicating the author in the crime.
The judge ruled that the activist was not clearly identified as being one of the attackers, thus giving him the benefit of the doubt.
It is not clear when the 7 years begin to run although in arecent decision in Jamaica, R v. Anthony, the judge ruled that the nonparole period for a prisoner convicted of noncapital murder should run from a date three months after the date of conviction.
The judge ruled that the Electoral Act was void because it violated the Constitution articles on anti-discriminatory provisions.
The court found in favor of VCX, and the judge ruled that"Weisberg's actions had thrust the film irretrievably into the public domain.
The judge ruled she violated laws on segregation of the sexes, as she was in an unrelated man's car at the time of the attack.
On January 10, 2013, a judge ruled that the evidence presented is sufficient for Holmes to face trial on all counts with which he has been charged.
The judge ruled that Glick's presence was inflammatory, and that,"there is a risk of violence breaking out if the respondent returns to the compound before the end of legal proceedings in his case.
In addition, a judge ruled that Warner Bros. did not owe the families additional royalties from previous films.
A judge ruled that although"water is a necessary ingredient to sustaining life", residents nevertheless had no"enforceable right" to water and that the city needed the revenue.
In addition, the judge ruled that they should be forbidden from entering Judea and Samaria(the West Bank) until 9 September. Ha'aretz, 3 September.
On 5 October 2010, the judge ruled that Mr. Al Jabouri could not be tried twice for the same crime, and ordered his release, but he was never released.
However, the judge ruled that the police could investigate the violations without the two being held in custody. Ha'aretz, Jerusalem Post, 21 November 1993.
In 1991 a federal district judge ruled that the trial attorney's behaviour breached Ms. Beets' right to adequate counsel; this was reversed by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Although the judge ruled that the lawyer had to alert the State company partner and the necessity to prevent slavery, but not proven that non-definiteness is causing them financial damage.
The judge ruled that the prosecution had failed to prove that the defendants had attacked the policeman and added that it was not illegal for them to gather near the Street of Chains entrance to the Temple Mount. Jerusalem Post, 20 January.
The judge ruled that the counsel of Kazakhstan, namely, the law firm: Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt& Mosle LLP(hereinafter referred to as‘the counsel of Kazakhstan'), should make the decision public by posting it on the Facebook pages on which parts of the stolen correspondence were published.
The judge ruled that as the murders were committed on the same occasion the author was guilty of capital murder. His appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal of Jamaica on 24 July 1995. On 6 June 1996, the author's petition for special leave to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was dismissed.
The judges ruled that there existed.
Three senior judges ruled against this argument.
These rules are similar to what are called"Judges Rules" in England.