Примеры использования Non-mandatory rules на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Non-mandatory rules relating to the rights of the secured creditor.
The following paragraphs address the more common non-mandatory rules of this type.
Non-mandatory rules regardless of who is in possession.
The following paragraphs address the more common non-mandatory rules of this type.
Non-mandatory rules where the grantor is in possession.
This chapter does not address all the situations where States may wish to develop non-mandatory rules.
These non-mandatory rules are addressed in chapter X Enforcement.
Nonetheless, because of the impact these rules may have on third parties,States often adopt a mixture of mandatory and non-mandatory rules.
Non-mandatory rules where the secured creditor is in possession.
Section B of this chapter considers various mandatory and non-mandatory rules to deal with pre-default rights and obligations in relation to particular types of asset and transaction.
Non-mandatory rules regardless of who is in possession Asset-specific remarks.
To achieve the desired functionally equivalent results, therefore, States will have to provide a mix of mandatory and non-mandatory rules vesting each of these prerogatives and these obligations in the buyer and not in the seller or lessor.
These non-mandatory rules are addressed in chapter X Post-default rights.
Any agreement that derogates from or modifies non-mandatory rules only binds the parties to that agreement and does not affect the rights of third parties.
Finally, non-mandatory rules make it possible for the principle of party autonomy to operate most efficiently.
This Guide takes the position that the true justification for non-mandatory rules lies in the fact that they can be used to promote policy objectives consistent with the logic of a regime of secured transactions.
The non-mandatory rules discussed in this section are those directed to predefault rights and obligations of the parties.
The third, which is the subject of sections A.4 and A.5,concerns the type and number of non-mandatory rules that could be included in modern secured transactions legislation, so as to encompass new and evolving forms of secured transactions.
Providing non-mandatory rules relating to the rights and obligations of the parties that apply in cases where the parties have not addressed these matters in their agreement; and.
Some States use non-mandatory rules to protect weaker parties.
These non-mandatory rules relating to pre-default rights and obligations of assignors and assignees of intangible property help to structure the relationship between them.
In certain circumstances, the applicable law may contain non-mandatory rules regulating the contract in regard to certain issues, for instance, in regard to the quality of the goods and services to be supplied.
Providing non-mandatory rules to serve as a drafting aid or checklist of issues the parties may wish to address in their agreement.
Section B of this chapter considers the various mandatory and non-mandatory rules that might be contemplated to deal with pre-default rights and obligations in relation to particular types of asset and transaction.
Yet, because non-mandatory rules will usually reflect the needs, practices and policies of particular States their specific configuration varies enormously.
However, the policies underlying the non-mandatory rules for grantor-in-possession security are also aimed at maximizing the economic potential of the encumbered assets.
These mandatory and non-mandatory rules relating to pre-default rights and obligations of assignors and assignees of intangible assets help to structure the relationship between them.
In the assessment it replaced the reference to German non-mandatory rules by reference to the rules of the CISG, namely Art. 74(2) CISG, and held that exclusion of liability in the terms and conditions to be void.
The mandatory and non-mandatory rules pertaining to the pre-default rights and obligations of parties relate to the manner in which the prerogatives and responsibilities of ownership are allocated between the grantor and the secured creditor.
Even when parties decide to modify the stated non-mandatory rules so as to better achieve their purposes, the exercise of having attended to them ensures that these matters are considered and not inadvertently left aside.