Примеры использования Nuclear weapons may на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Possession of nuclear weapons may indeed justify an inference of preparedness to use them.
There is a fear thatweapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons, may be used in these conflicts.
The existence of zero nuclear weapons may sound utopian, but the effort is required in the name of humanity.
Indeed, in some situations, and in the context of emerging security doctrines, the risks of armed conflict involving nuclear weapons may even have increased.
Moreover, countries that try to acquire nuclear weapons may be exposed to the impact of new risks and become more vulnerable.
With respect to draft resolution A/C.1/49/L.36, Japan considers that,in the present international situation, pursuing the question of the legality of the use of nuclear weapons may simply result in confrontation between countries.
Thus, the risk that nuclear weapons may be used by accident or miscalculation or without authorization has not diminished but rather increased.
Addressing non-strategic nuclear weapons may also highlight possible inconsistencies between declaratory policies and deployment postures, particularly with respect to negative security assurances.
Financial Transactions- Crimes involving the proliferation of biological,chemical, or nuclear weapons may also implicate the money laundering and forfeiture laws.
Some even entertain the notion that nuclear weapons may be used pre-emptively against non-nuclear-weapon States or see them as a possible defence against conventional weapons. .
Our position is that such a convention should take into account reservations with regard to cases in which nuclear weapons may be used in accordance with the military doctrines of the nuclear Powers.
It is important to recognize that, while nuclear weapons may present a grave danger to the world as weapons of mass destruction, it is small arms and light weapons that have been responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people in the world today.
Verification activities undertaken to detect clandestine facilities in states possessing nuclear weapons may have to be more restrictive than in non-nuclear-weapon states.
Nuclear weapons may range in sophistication from fission weapons to boosted weapons, thermonuclear weapons, fission-fusion-fission weapons and enhanced radiation weapons. .
A treaty that would allow the continued development of new nuclear weapons may undermine the primary rationale for concluding such an instrument in the first place.
One of the unfortunate consequences of China's decision to continue testing is that nations that aspire to possess nuclear weapons will question the sincerity of nuclear-weapon States about eventual nuclear disarmament andtheir interest in developing nuclear weapons may be reinforced.
This threat is compounded by the danger that the actual use of nuclear weapons may be brought about, not only in the event of war, but even through human or mechanical error or failure.
Recognizing that effective measures to protect non-nuclear weapon states against the use orthreat of use of nuclear weapons may positively contribute to the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and strengthen international peace and security;
It is possible that in such States incentives to acquire nuclear weapons may be reduced by offers of normal relations and by assurances that military intervention or subversion aiming at regime change will not be undertaken.
There is a growing fear that nuclear weapons might be given a more prominent and additional role in security policies.
The circle of insecurity andfear surrounding the fact that nuclear weapons might one day be deployed in an armed conflict is made worse by the worldwide presence of nuclear weapons. .
Concern was expressed that recent developments regarding the possible use of nuclear weapons might undermine commitments taken under that resolution.
It also supported a comprehensive negative security assurances agreement provided that it contained reservations stipulating when nuclear weapons might be used.
Oman welcomed the efforts of individual countries to halt nuclear testing andurged all countries to do so in the hope that nuclear weapons might be banned outright.
The ultimate practical value of the treaty is its role in minimizing andultimately eliminating the potential that a nuclear weapon may be used.
Senior United States officials had confirmed the contents of the report anddescribed various scenarios in which nuclear weapons might be used against the States concerned.
What prompts the question are indications that nuclear weapons might be considered to be used preemptively to attack highvalue targets.
That development pointed to a new era in which nuclear weapons might be used in military operations, a situation that was incompatible with all the relevant treaties and the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons. .
Threat of Use of Nuclear Weapons" means any act, whether physical or verbal, including the maintenance of a previously statedpolicy that creates or is intended to create a perception that a nuclear weapon may or will be used.