Примеры использования Number of non-permanent members на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Need to increase the number of non-permanent members.
The number of non-permanent members should be increased from 10 to 15.
Not a single country is opposed to increasing the number of non-permanent members.
The number of non-permanent members should be increased by four, five or six.
We would instead increase the number of non-permanent members from 10 to 20.
The number of non-permanent members representing various parts of the world should also be increased.
We should like here to propose that the number of non-permanent members be increased to 15, to be selected as follows.
We join the calls to grant Germany andJapan permanent seats on the Council and to increase the number of non-permanent members.
The argument that to increase the number of non-permanent members of the Council would just perpetuate the status quo is, in fact, fallacious.
Equitable geographical representation would also mean an increase the number of non-permanent members of the Council.
The number of non-permanent members was increased in 1965 in order to represent more fairly the growing international community.
The Council has been reformed only once, more than 45 years ago, to increase the number of non-permanent members from 6 to 10.
In the event that it is decided to increase the number of non-permanent members by four, the seats will be distributed according to the following pattern.
Furthermore, we believe that any increase in the number of permanent seats on the Council must not be achieved at the expense of the number of non-permanent members.
We believe that it is also necessary to increase the number of non-permanent members, taking due account of the interests of the Asian region.
The number of non-permanent members should be increased by five, and care should be taken to ensure equitable regional representation.
It also recognized that there was a wide support for increasing the number of non-permanent members in the Security Council.
In 1963 when the number of non-permanent members of the Security Council was increased from 6 to 10, the United Nations membership stood at 113.
As stated by the Non-Aligned Movement,if there is no agreement on other categories, the number of non-permanent members must be immediately increased.
Next, the number of non-permanent members of the Council should be increased in such a way as to ensure more balanced and equitable representation.
We believe that it will also be necessary to increase the number of non-permanent members, with due account being taken of the interests of the Asian region.
The number of non-permanent members should be increased on the basis of equitable geographical representation, and the fulcrum of decision-making should shift.
In that respect, we consider it important to increase the number of non-permanent members first, so that developing countries are fully represented.
That said, my delegation would go along with the suggestion to create a category of permanent members without a veto and to increase the number of non-permanent members.
In this regard, my Government favours increasing the number of non-permanent members, with the possibility of being re-elected in order to promote accountability.
One way of maintaining the efficiency of the Council while increasing its representativeness might be to increase the number of non-permanent members by one for each regional group.
First, increase the number of non-permanent members in the Council to an appropriate level, reflecting the growth of the membership and its present diversity.
As stated by the Non-Aligned Movement, if agreement is not reached in other categories,at least the number of non-permanent members should be increased for the time being.
The Central American region strongly supports the idea of increasing the number of non-permanent members of the Security Council, in view of the need for equitable geographical representation.
In current circumstances, andgiven the split between Member States, it seems possible to reach a sufficient consensus only with regard to the idea of increasing the number of non-permanent members.