Примеры использования Overall utilization factor на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The overall utilization factor for 2000 was 81 per cent.
She shared its concern, expressed in paragraphs 34 and 35 of its report(A/57/32),regarding the drop in the overall utilization factor at the four duty stations, and supported its recommendations for achieving optimum utilization of conference-servicing resources.
The overall utilization factor for 2001 was 74 per cent.
Under that method, the overall utilization factor would drop to 72 per cent.
The overall utilization factor for 1994 was 82 per cent.
As shown in table 2 of annex III, the overall utilization factor for all four duty stations in 2009 was 86 per cent 85 per cent in 2008.
The overall utilization factor for 1995 was 76 per cent.
His delegation welcomed the fact that the overall utilization factor had increased from 83 per cent in 2004 to 85 per cent in 2005.
The overall utilization factor is calculated by adding up the data in the six columns for all bodies in the four duty stations and treating them as if they reflected a single body.
According to the supplementary information to the report, the overall utilization factor for meetings for all four duty stations in 2011 remained at 85 per cent, as in 2010.
The overall utilization factor had remained above the established benchmark of 80 per cent.
It is worth noting that the overall utilization factor remained above the established benchmark of 80 per cent.
The overall utilization factor for 2000, 81 per cent, is the same as it was in 1999 and 1998.
Annex II contains an analysis of the statistics, including the overall utilization factor, and a breakdown in terms of percentages of the meeting ratio and planning accuracy factor of the bodies in the sample.
The overall utilization factor for 2002 was 75 per cent.
The Advisory Committee notes that according to the formula, the overall utilization factor for 2003 is higher than in 2002 and 2001, reflecting a general increase in utilization of conference resources at all duty stations since 2001.
The overall utilization factor for 2004 was 83 per cent.
At 85 per cent in 2005, the overall utilization factor is 2 per cent higher than in 2004 and 8 per cent higher than in 2003.
The overall utilization factor in 2004, 83 per cent, is six percentage points higher than in 2003 and eight percentage points higher than in 2002 and exceeds the benchmark for the first time since 2000.
Notes with appreciation that the overall utilization factor for 1997 exceeded the benchmark of 80 per cent, in particular at Geneva and Vienna;
The overall utilization factor in 2003, 77 per cent, is two percentage points higher than in 2002 and three percentage points higher than in 2001.
As shown in the following table, the overall utilization factor for 2006 was 83 per cent, 2 per cent lower than in 2005 and the same as reported in 2004.
The overall utilization factor for all four duty stations in 2010 was 85 per cent 86 per cent in 2009.
Expresses concern that the overall utilization factor for conference services fell below the established benchmark figure of 80 per cent in 1994;
The overall utilization factor for 2001, 74 per cent, is 7 percentage points lower than in 2000 and 1999.
Notes with satisfaction that the overall utilization factor at the four main duty stations increased to 85 per cent in 2005 from 83 per cent in 2004;
The overall utilization factor for all four duty stations in 2010 was 85 per cent(86 per cent in 2009) see supplementary information, sect. II, table 2.
At 85 per cent in 2008, the overall utilization factor for all four duty stations improved by 2 percentage points as compared with 83 per cent reported in 2007 and 2006.
The overall utilization factor for 2004 was 83 per cent, exceeding the established benchmark of 80 per cent for the first time since 2000 see A/60/93, para. 8.
It is worth noting that the overall utilization factor remained above the established benchmark of 80 per cent; however, the utilization in New York showed a 2 per cent decrease.