Примеры использования Overt act на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
- 
                                                                                        Official
                                                                                    
 - 
                                                                                        Colloquial
                                                                                    
 
Any withhold comes after an overt act.
An overt act violates what was agreed upon.
A failure to destroy can be, therefore, an overt act.
A withhold is, then, an overt act that a person committed that he or she is not talking about.
Harming everything andhelping everything alike can be overt acts.
By“justification” we mean explaining how an overt act was not really an overt act.
But then violates those agreements,he commits what is called an overt act.
The attempt to lessen an overt act by explaining how it was not really an overt act. .
Assistance to something that would harm a greater number can also be an overt act.
People withhold overt acts  because they conceive that telling them would be another overt act.
A harmful act  or a transgression against the moral code of a group is called an overt act.
For an act  of commission oromission to be an overt act, it must harm the greater number of people and areas of life.
The person will make less of the individual he has wronged in an effort to lessen his overt act.
JUSTIFICATION When a person has committed an overt act and then withholds it, he or she usually employs the social mechanism of justification.
This action is a violation of the agreements of the marriage andis classified as an overt act.
Silence concerning the overt acts of aggression of which Iraq is a victim can in no way serve to justify such acts. .
If, for example, a man gambles away the money needed to pay the family bills,he has committed an overt act.
This element is commonly called an overt act, which completes the existence of the offence with respect to all the co-conspirators.
The reason it is called a“motivator” is because it tends to prompt that one pays it back- it“motivates” a new overt act.
Jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court has established that an overt act need not be proved unless a statute expressly states that requirement.
When a person does something that is contrary to the moral code he has agreed to, or when he omits to do something that he should have done per that moral code,he has committed an overt act.
In the event, Khartoum not only refused toheed these continuous appeals, but escalated its overt acts of terror and subversion beyond limits.
Again, these were not presented to you as overt acts of the Creator, but as the result of creation that brings about these changes of weather and tectonics and so on.
Some preparatory acts are covered under conspiracy(s.203), if any party to the conspiracy commits an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.
An overt act is not just injuring someone or something, it is an act  of omission or commission which does the least good for the least number of people or areas of life, or the most harm to the greatest number of people or areas of life.
When a person does something that is contrary to the moral code he has agreed to, or when he omits to do something that he should have done per that moral code,he has committed an overt act.
A person conspires to commit a crime where the person agrees with one ormore persons that a common intention to commit a crime be carried out and an overt act is committed by the person or by at least one other party to the agreement for the purpose of furthering the agreement.
If we understand overt acts of violence against women as a symptom of underlying cultural patterns of disrespect, then it is clear that the problem must be specifically addressed in the domestic sphere of family expectations of girls and women, as well as in all settings where intimate relations occur.
Model Legislative Provisions against Organized Crime countries,the concept of conspiracy is not recognized as the general position is that mere planning of an offence, without an overt act to put the plan into operation, is not criminal.
Second, in those jurisdictions which require proof of an overt act  committed in furtherance of the agreement, as many jurisdictions do, it becomes difficult to target high-ranking members of organized criminal groups who mastermind the activities but who are not involved in executing the plans andthus do not engage in any overt acts.