Примеры использования Panel developed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Panel developed the procedure described below with these objectives in mind.
Upon assembling in January 2010, the Panel developed its methodology and approach to work.
This panel developed an element of methodology and described the system of information and feedback.
By applying the defined criteria, the panel developed a more concise and considerably shorter list.
The panel developed a series of recommendations, implicit in which was the panel's view that youth is an asset, not a problem.
Люди также переводят
After the introductory meeting with the Committee in New York on 18 April 2013, the Panel developed a programme of work to carry out its mandate.
To guide its work, the Panel developed a plan of action, which was transmitted to the Security Council.
Where the Panel encountered new issues not addressed in prior"E4" reports, the Panel developed methodologies for verifying and valuing the losses.
The Panel developed a two-step process for conducting the threshold eligibility assessment directed by the Governing Council.
To orient its work under the current mandate, the Panel developed two successive plans of action, which were transmitted to the Council.
The Panel developed a number of criteria to assist in its determination of what might constitute an"offensive" military overflight.
Upon a detailed review of the claims, and the resolution of a number of basic evidential andjurisdictional issues, the Panel developed a two part D4(PP) methodology.
In the First"D" Report, the Panel developed the methodology for the review of D3(death) claims.
Where the Panel encountered new issues not addressedin prior"E4" reports or the Special Overlap Report, the Panel developed methodologies for verifying and valuing the losses.
As a result, the Panel developed the central concept of the elite network(outlined in section II) as an operational thesis.
Where the Panel encountered new issues not addressed in the First“E4" Report, the Panel developed methodologies for verifying and valuing those losses as described below.
The Panel developed a number of criteria to assist in its determination of what might constitute an"offensive" military overflight.
All 26 claims involve a similar fact pattern, namely, claimants who hold Jordanian passports andwho remained in Kuwait during the regular filing period for which the panel developed specific guidelines.
As a result of the Vladivostok briefing, the Panel developed a series of recommendations that were sent to IUCN, for forwarding to Sakhalin Energy, on 8 March 2007.
The verification and valuation methodology applied by the Panel to the second instalment claims is the same as that used in the first instalment.(See the First“E4” Report, paras. 32-62.)Where the Panel encountered new issues not addressed in the First“E4” Report, the Panel developed methodologies for verifying and valuing those losses as described below.
In its first report the Panel developed certain guidelines to assess the claims for serious personal injuries or deaths that occurred as a result of road traffic accidents.
In order to ensure consistency in the percentage representing disability that would be applied to all claimants, the Panel developed its own“Table of Maims” taking into consideration the rates applied in the entities covered by the study.
Agents: The panel developed criteria for inclusion of micro-organisms and toxins in the ongoing monitoring and verification plan with the aim of focusing on selected agents and eliminating shortcomings of the existing lengthy lists.
To assist in providing information to the Committee on individuals who impede the peace process orconstitute a threat to stability in Darfur and the region, the Panel developed a set of criteria defining actions or omissions that may constitute such impediments to the peace process or threats to stability.
With the assistance of its petroleum engineering consultants, the Panel developed a comprehensive technical verification programme first to assess the method employed by KPC and its consultants, and then to verify that the method was employed by KPC and its consultants in an acceptable way.
As outlined in its three previous reports, the Panel developed procedures to identify and deal with various types of irregularities in the supporting documentation submitted by some claimants.
With the requirements of article 35 of the Rules in mind, the Panel developed, with the assistance of its expert consultants, evidentiary guidelines that it used to verify and value each Claim that was found to be compensable in principle.
In addition, as requested in resolution 2017(2011), the Panel developed proposals to counter the illicit proliferation of all arms and related materiel(in particular man-portable surface-to-air missiles), to secure stockpiles; and to strengthen borders control.
The Panel develops activities under three substantive components: disaster prevention and preparedness, hydrology and meteorology, as well as training and research.
In addition, as requested by the Council in its resolution 2017(2011), the Panel develops proposals to counter the illicit proliferation of all arms and related materiel(in particular man-portable, surface-to-air missiles), to secure stockpiles and to strengthen border control.