Примеры использования Policy of nuclear deterrence на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
China does not endorse the policy of nuclear deterrence.
The policy of nuclear deterrence or of military superiority still remains.
Major nuclear-weapon States should abandon their policy of nuclear deterrence.
China opposes the policy of nuclear deterrence based upon the first use of nuclear weapons.
Major nuclear-weapon States should abandon their policy of nuclear deterrence.
Hence the need to abandon the policy of nuclear deterrence, which merely perpetuates nuclear tension.
The country concerned, which possesses a cutting-edge nuclear arsenal and the most sophisticated conventionalweapons in the world, pursues a policy of nuclear deterrence based on first-use of nuclear weapons.
We are all opposed to the policy of nuclear deterrence, which is based on first use of nuclear weapons.
We believe that nuclear-weapon States and other States with a nuclear capacity should review their policies, strategies andmilitary doctrines- doctrines adopted during the cold war- and that these States should reject the policy of nuclear deterrence.
We all object to the policy of nuclear deterrence based on the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons.
First, China has adopted a rational nuclear strategy,firmly rejecting the policy of nuclear deterrence based on the first use of nuclear weapons.
The policy of nuclear deterrence based on the first use of nuclear weapons and lowering the thresholdof using nuclear weapons should be abandoned.
Precisely because of its own experience of being subjected to nuclear threats,China always opposes the policy of nuclear deterrence and will never base its own security on a nuclear threat against other countries.
In the new international situation, the policy of nuclear deterrence based on the first-use of nuclear weapons was against the trend of the times, and the relevant nuclear-weapon States should abandon this policy at an early date.
Unilateral declarations of national security interests, based on the legitimization of nuclear weapons, in the security strategies ordoctrines of some nuclear-weapon States will create another nuclear arms race and perpetuate the policy of nuclear deterrence.
Importantly, phasing out reliance on the policy of nuclear deterrence would be highly conducive to making progress in all other areas.
In order to expedite nuclear disarmament and free ourselves from the danger of nuclear war forever, I wish to reiterate the following calls on behalf of the Chinese Government: first,the major nuclear Powers should renounce their policy of nuclear deterrence; those possessing huge nuclear arsenals should continue to cut back their stockpiles drastically.
Nuclear-weapon States should abandon the policy of nuclear deterrence based on the first use of nuclear weapons and reduce the roleof nuclear weapons in their national security;
China has its own views with regard to some members of military alliances which,while enjoying the protection of a nuclear umbrella and supporting the policy of nuclear deterrence, resort to the practice of making remarks about a small number of limited nuclear tests conducted by another State.
The international community must reject the policy of nuclear deterrence and place a permanent ban on nuclear weapon testing; the conclusion of a fissile material cut-off treaty with an international monitoring mechanism would be another crucial step.
Having been repeatedly subjected to the nuclear threat by certain nuclear Powers, andin view of the fact that these Powers maintain their policy of nuclear deterrence, China has conducted a limited number of nuclear tests, and it possesses a small stock of nuclear weapons, solely for the purpose of self-defence.
In addition, vigorous efforts should be made to renounce the policy of nuclear deterrence, to dismantle nuclear weapons deployed beyond national frontiers, to achieve a complete cessation of nuclear tests and to ensure that moratoriums on nuclear tests were not broken and, finally, to ensure that objective, and not selective, application of International Atomic Energy Agency(IAEA) safeguards to dual-purpose facilities, compulsory inspection of suspect nuclear facilities, and reconversion of nuclear capacity to peaceful purposes.
Nuclear-weapon States should abandon the policy of nuclear deterrence based on first use of nuclear weapons and should reduce the role of nuclear weapons in their national security.
Fourthly, nuclear-weapon States should abandon the policy of nuclear deterrence based upon the first use of nuclear weapons and reduce the roleof nuclear weapons in their national security.
The nuclear-weapon States concerned should abandon their policy of nuclear deterrence; the States with large nuclear arsenals should further reduce drastically their nuclear stockpiles, and should destroy the removed nuclear warheads rather than simply transfer them from deployment to storage.
It also elaborated its position on the relationship between negative security assurances and the doctrine and policy of nuclear deterrence saying that the nuclear deterrence policies pursued by the nuclear-weapon States, based on the first-use of nuclear weapons, made it difficult for the non-nuclear-weapon States to realize their aspirations of negative security assurances- the unconditional assurance of negative security guarantees.
Policies of nuclear deterrence remain current.
Some nuclear-weapon States still insist on their policies of nuclear deterrence and are continuing with their research and development of space weapons.
It was unacceptable to develop a concept of international security based on promoting anddeveloping military alliances and policies of nuclear deterrence.
It therefore expresses its concern over the insistence of some parties on promoting policies of nuclear deterrence and other policies for developing weapons of mass destruction.