Примеры использования Public justification на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Public justification of terrorism and other terrorist activity[35];
People were convicted exclusively under Article 2052(“public incitement to terrorist activities or public justification of terrorism”);
The persistence of the veto- which, moreover,can be exercised without any public justification- represents a serious obstacle to the achievement of substantive agreements.
In particular, criminal liability was established for public incitement of terrorist acts and public justification of terrorism.
Any public justification of terrorism or extremism was also recognized as extremism(it should be recalled that terrorism is already included in the definition of extremism, so the wording is redundant).
In addition, in February 2019, the journalist became a suspect in a criminal case under Article 2052 Part 2 of the Criminal Code(public justification of terrorism in mass media).
The public justification of the ideology and practice of Nazism, the profession that it is correct and deserving of support and emulation, and also the public dissemination of the ideology of Nazism;
We would also like to point out the sentence under Article 2052 of the Criminal Code(public justification of terrorism) against Mahmud Velitov, the Imam of the Moscow Yardyam Mosque.
In our opinion, Prokopieva's show contained no signs of justifying terrorist activity. Meanwhile, she is still a suspect in a criminal case under Article 205.2 Part 2 of(public justification of terrorism in the media).
Grouping sanctions“for the actions” andsanctions“for the words”(“Public calls…or public justification of terrorism”) within the same bill de facto puts these entirely conceptually different crimes on the same level.
She asked whether there was any legislationcurrently under discussion or preparation that might serve as a good example of evidence-based public justification for the necessity of mass surveillance.
Incitement to a terrorist act,calling publicly for the commission of terrorist acts and public justification of terrorism have all been prohibited by law articles 33, 34 and 205, paras. 1 and 2, of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
In particular in the case of high-burden countries,the principle of progressive realization under human rights law means that the budget for maternal health programmes would be expected to increase unless there is public justification to the contrary;
As a fifth and final trend, terrorism has largely replaced drug-related crime as the primary public justification for extending the powers of the police in the investigation or prevention of crime.
In 2009 draft legislation was prepared to supplementthe Kyrgyz Criminal Code, establishing criminal responsibility for terrorist propaganda, public incitement to commit terrorist acts and public justification of terrorism.
He was sentenced to 2.5 years in a penal colony under Part 1 of the Criminal Code Article 205.2(public calls to terrorist activity or public justification of terrorism), Part 1 of Article 280(public calls for extremist activities), and Part 1 of Article 282(humiliation on the grounds of nationality).
According to Article 2052, public justification of terrorism should be understood as“a public statement on the recognition of the ideology or practices of terrorism as correct, and in need of support and a following;” there is no other legal definition of this concept in Russian legislation.
The abductions and murders in May 1997 of Palestinians who had been involved in such transactions had been given public justification by high-ranking Palestinian officials.
The wording is similar to Article 2052(public incitement toterrorist activity or public justification of terrorism) and Article 280(public incitementtoextremist activity), so it implies punishment for the same act, but for the publishers rather than the authors.
Public justification of terrorism or other terrorist activity; incitement to social, racial, ethnic or religious discord; the promotion of exclusivity, superiority or inferiority on the basis of a person's social, racial, ethnic, religious or linguistic origin or religion;
One year later, in December 2016 another blogger from Tyumen, Siberia, received a two-and-a-half year prison sentence for the extremist crime of“public justification of terrorism,” after writing a blog post criticizing Russia's military involvement in Syria.
According to Article 205.2 of the Criminal Code, public justification of terrorism should be understood as“a public statement on the recognition of the ideology or practices of terrorism as correct, and in need of support and a following;” there is no other legal definition of this concept in Russian legislation.
A new criminal case was launched in mid-April against Bashkir nationalist Airat Dilmukhametov under Article 205.2 Part 2 of the Criminal Code(public justification of terrorism on the Internet) and Part 1 of Article 280 of the Criminal Code(public calls for extremist activity).
The subject of the charges brought against the 21 November 2012 and served as the signature of three articles Stomakhin published on the Internet, namely,"Do not let another Holocaust" and"Untermensch"(in Part 1 of Article 282 of the Criminal Code,"excitement hatred and hostility on grounds of nationality or origin"),and"Mourning" in Part 1 of the Criminal Code st.205.2,"public justification of terrorism.
The Special Rapporteur calls upon all States that currently operate mass digital surveillance technology to provide a detailed and evidence-based public justification for the systematic interference with the privacy rights of the online community by reference to the requirements of article 17 of the Covenant.
While“public justification of terrorism” is defined in the relevant Article 205.2 of the Criminal Code(as a public statement recognizing the ideology or practices of terrorism as correct, and in need of support and following), the concept of“justification of and excuse for extremist activity” is not defined in Russian legislation, opening the way for arbitrary interpretations.
One State noted that incitement to commit acts of terrorism fell within the meaning of"extremist activity",which was prohibited by law and included public justification of terrorism, instigation of social, racial, ethnic or religious conflict and public calls for violent overthrow of the constitutional order.
While“public justification of terrorism” is defined in the relevant Article 2052 of the Criminal Code(a public statement on the recognition of the ideology or practices of terrorism as correct, and in need of support and following), Russian legislation never defines the concept of“ justification of and excuse for extremist activity,” opening the way for arbitrary interpretations.
In late October, the Caucasus District Military Court found Magomednabi Magomedov- the imam of Vostochnaya Mosque andthe chairman of the Imams' City Council of Khasavyurt- guilty under Article 2052 Part 1 of the Criminal Code(public incitement to terrorist activity or public justification of terrorism) and under Article 282 Part 1 and sentenced him to five years' imprisonment in a minimum-security penal colony.
We know of no inappropriate sentences under Article the 205.2 of the Criminal Code(public justification of terrorism) issued during the review period in 2018; however, one new case opened under this article raises our doubts, since it is not clear whether in this case statements, justifying terrorist activity, were made publicly.