Примеры использования Reactions to reservations на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
- 
                                                                                        Official
                                                                                    
 - 
                                                                                        Colloquial
                                                                                    
 
Validity of reactions to reservations.
At the same meeting, the Commission also adopted the title of section 3.4 of the Guide to  Practice Permissibility of reactions to reservations.
Conclusions regarding reactions to reservations.
There were many types of reactions to reservations, not all of which were objections within the meaning of the Vienna Conventions, thus prompting uncertainties as to  their precise scope.
Section 3.4 Permissibility of reactions to reservations.
Support was expressed for draft guideline 2.9.10,subjecting reactions to  conditional interpretative declarations to  the same guidelines as those governing reactions to reservations.
Permissibility of reactions to reservations.
Moreover, that the Vienna rules do not pertain to  the effects of invalid reservations  is clearly confirmed by the great majority of States' reactions to reservations that they consider invalid.
Permissibility of reactions to reservations 412.
It was therefore appropriate to  recognize the right of States to  recharacterize a conditional interpretative declaration as a reservation and to  apply with respect to  conditional interpretative declarations the rules on reactions to reservations.
Consequently, the emphasis should be on the effects of reactions to reservations and to  interpretative declarations.
Little is known of the work of COJUR in this area, which consists primarily of periodic exchanges of information andin-depth exchanges of views among members of the European Union in order to  coordinate their reactions to reservations that are deemed to  be impermissible.
Section 3.4 dealt with the permissibility of reactions to reservations, a question that had not been addressed in the Vienna Conventions.
Moreover, the irrelevance of the Vienna rules is clearly confirmed by the great majority of States' reactions to reservations that they consider invalid.
There was a view, however,that the time period for reactions to reservations should not be applicable to  conditional interpretative declarations.
Nonetheless, efforts made within the framework of European regional organizations, including the European Union and the Council of Europe, are beginning to  bear fruit andthe States members of these organizations are coordinating their reactions to reservations with increasing frequency.
The fourteenth report also addressed the question of the permissibility of reactions to reservations, of interpretative declarations and of reactions to  interpretative declarations.
Reactions to reservations to  the growing number of normative treaties often focused primarily on the proper interpretation of a given provision rather than on the specific inter se application of the provision concerned between the reserving and the objecting State.
Section 3.4 dealt with permissibility of reactions to reservations.
It was also suggested that the question of the permissibility of reactions to reservations be examined further, while taking into account the sovereign right of States to  express their opinions about a reservation. .
However, in order to  understand the draft guidelines proposed in this report for inclusion in part III of the Guide to  Practice, it seems appropriate to  recall the context of the issue of the validity of reservations  and to  briefly review the draft guidelines already adopted by the Commission in 2006 and 2007166(A),before addressing the related issue of the validity of reactions to reservations B.
The Commission should therefore focus on the effects of reactions to reservations to  treaties.
Thus, it seems neither appropriate noruseful to  create a new term for these reactions to reservations, since the current term not only corresponds to  the definition of"objection" adopted by the Commission but is also used extensively in State practice and, it would appear, is universally accepted and understood.
States, however, were free to  form their own judgement and to  decide on reactions to reservations which were deemed impermissible.
Little use had been made of the option of not entering into treaty relations,one reason being that reactions to reservations to  the growing number of normative treaties, such as human rights instruments or environmental treaties, often focused primarily on the proper interpretation of a given provision rather than on the specific inter se application of the provision concerned between the reserving and the objecting State.
Unlike the case of reservations,  the Vienna Conventions do not setforth any criteria or conditions for the substantive validity of reactions to reservations, although they deal extensively with acceptances and objections.
Part 5 of the Guide also addressed many other matters that were not covered under article 20of the 1978 Convention, including reactions to reservations(objections and acceptances) in cases of succession(sections 5.2 and 5.3), and specific issues relating to  the relevance of certain reservations  or objections, the territorial scope of reservations(guidelines 5.1.3, 5.1.5 and 5.2.2) and the fate of interpretative declarations in cases of succession of States guideline 5.5.
Yet another State suggested that the draft should be supplemented by model statements, which would seem to  include not only model clauses, as the Commission has envisaged, but also model acceptances,objections or other reactions to reservations and interpretative declarations similar to  those contemplated by the Council of Europe; this suggestion would appear to  merit consideration.
Guideline 2.9.10 provided that the guidelines applicable to  reactions to reservations should apply, mutatis mutandis, to reactions to  conditional interpretative declarations.
They may need to  be supplemented with draft guidelines on determination of the validity of reactions to reservations, of interpretative declarations and of reactions to  interpretative declarations F.