Примеры использования Responsibility of another state на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
An injured State which invokes the responsibility of another State shall give notice of its claim to that State. .
Moreover, draft article 1 on diplomatic protection defined diplomatic protection as consisting in the invocation by a State of the responsibility of another State.
Any State other than an injured State is entitled to invoke the responsibility of another State in accordance with paragraph 2 if.
In such a situation, however,no State should by itself, without the concurrence of at least a substantial number of other concerned States, invoke the responsibility of another State.
A State is entitled as an injured State to invoke the responsibility of another State if the obligation breached is owed to.
The wording of article 1 appropriately emphasizes the close links between diplomatic protection andthe law of State responsibility by characterizing diplomatic protection as a specific means for a State to invoke the responsibility of another State.
A State is entitled as an injured State to invoke the responsibility of another State as provided in Part Two if the obligation breached is owed.
In doctrine the most controversial aspect of diplomatic protection concerns the question whose rights are asserted when the State of nationality invokes the responsibility of another State for injury caused to its national.
An injured State which seeks to invoke the responsibility of another State under these articles shall give notice of its claim to that State and should specify.
Draft article 3 raised the question of whose right was asserted when the State of nationality invoked the responsibility of another State for injury caused to its nationals.
In the case of bilateral treaties, a State may invoke the responsibility of another State whether or not it sustains any material injury as a result of the alleged breach draft article 43 a.
Draft article 3 raised the issue of whose right was being asserted when the State of nationality invoked the responsibility of another State for injury caused to its nationals.
It seems clear that,should a State be regarded as entitled to invoke the responsibility of another State which has breached an obligation towards the international community as a whole, the same applies with regard to the responsibility of an international organization that has committed a similar breach.
Under the present draft articles, a State is entitled as an injured State to invoke the responsibility of another State if the obligation breached is owed to.
With regard to notice of claim for invoking international responsibility of an international organization,there would be little reason for envisaging different modalities from those that are applicable when an injured State invokes the responsibility of another State.
Draft article 49 set out the situations in which a State other than the injured State was entitled to invoke the responsibility of another State and the procedure to be adopted for such invocation.
If the foreign national was unable to internationalize the dispute and take it out of the sphere of local law, his or her State of nationality, at its discretion,could espouse the individual's claim by having it undergo a veritable"transformation" since only a State could invoke the responsibility of another State.
The definition of injury allowing for the right of States to invoke the responsibility of another State for wrongful acts committed against the collective interest was a new and evolving concept in international law.
Under another view, in a situation where the breached obligation protected a collective interest or the interest of the international community, no State should by itself,without the concurrence of at least a substantial number of other concerned States, invoke the responsibility of another State.
Moreover, article 48 of those articles permits a State other than the injured State to invoke the responsibility of another State if the obligation breached is owed to the international community as a whole.
Subject to paragraph 2, any State other than an injured State is entitled to invoke the responsibility of another State if that State has committed an internationally wrongful act which constitutes a serious breach of an obligation owed to the international community of States as a whole and which is essential for the protection of its fundamental interests.
Otherwise, such rules should be deleted or replaced by provisions defining the concept of erga omnes,for example, provisions which did not permit any State to invoke the responsibility of another State for failing to comply with the peremptory norms of international law jus cogens.
Pursuant to the 2001 version of article 48,paragraph 1,"any State other than an injured State" is entitled to invoke the responsibility of another State in accordance with paragraph 2 of the article if"(a) the obligation breached is owed to a group of States including that State, and is established for the protection of a collective interest of the group; or(b) the obligation breached is owed to the international community as a whole.
Cuba considers that a convention based on the draft articles would contribute to the codification and progressive development of a set of rules governing the conditions for submission of a request for diplomatic protection and recognizing the right of the State to invoke, through diplomatic action orother means of peaceful settlement, the responsibility of another State for any injury caused by an internationally wrongful act by that State to a natural or legal person who is a national of the State invoking that responsibility. .
The rules granting any State other than the injured State the right to invoke the responsibility of another State which breached its obligations to the international community as a whole(obligations erga omnes) needed to be analysed in greater depth.
Diplomatic protection is a right that a State exercises by resorting to diplomatic action orother peaceful means of settling disputes to seek the responsibility of another State for injury caused by an internationally wrongful act committed by such State against a natural or legal person of the other State. .
Customary international law-- pursuant to which only sovereign States may invoke the responsibility of another State-- does not therefore affect the rights of non-State actors under particular treaties to invoke state responsibility.
As regards paragraph 2 of draft article 49, Invocation of responsibility by a State oran international organization other than an injured State or international organization, a comment was made that the right of an international organization to invoke the responsibility of another State or international organization in connection with a violation of an obligation owed to the international community as a whole should be limited by the organization 's powers under its constitutive instrument.
Article 49 would allow any State other than the injured State to invoke the responsibility of another State, while article 54 would further allow such States to take countermeasures at the request and on behalf of an injured State. .
Lastly, with respect to paragraph 3 of draft article 48(Responsibility of an international organization and one or more States or international organizations),his delegation considered that the right of an international organization to invoke the responsibility of another State or international organization in connection with a violation of an obligation owed to the international community as a whole should be limited by the organization's powers under its founding instrument, following the principle of conferred powers.