Примеры использования Said that his delegation opposed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Mr. Boisson(Monaco) said that his delegation opposed the inclusion of the supplementary item.
Mr. Gilman(United States),speaking in explanation of his vote before the voting, said that his delegation opposed the proposal.
Mr. Stastoli(Albania) said that his delegation opposed any changes to the draft resolution.
Mr. Churkin(Russian Federation), supported by Mr. Wang Guangya(China) andMr. Swe(Myanmar), said that his delegation opposed the inclusion of item 156.
Mr. MOKTEFI(Algeria) said that his delegation opposed the New Zealand motion; the matter should be put to a vote.
Mr. Vimal(India), speaking in explanation of vote before the voting, said that his delegation opposed the stereotyping of any religion.
Mr. Wang Guangya(China) said that his delegation opposed the inclusion of item 157 in the agenda of the General Assembly for the sixty-third session.
Mr. Rees(United States of America), speaking in explanation of vote before the voting, said that his delegation opposed the resolution and had made its position clear.
Mr. Wang Zhaoxue(China) said that his delegation opposed the groundless accusations made against his country by the representative of the European Union.
Mr. Ceinos-Cox(United States of America),speaking in explanation of vote before the voting, said that his delegation opposed the draft resolution and would request a vote on its consideration.
Mr. Zhang Guixuan(China) said that his delegation opposed the politicization of human rights and attempts to use them as a pretext for exerting pressure on certain countries.
Mr. Obeid(Syrian Arab Republic) said that his delegation opposed the inclusion of the item.
Mr. Normandin(Canada) said that his delegation opposed the motion because the Committee was a universal body that could recommend action on human-rights issues.
Mr. Burman(United States of America), supported by Mr. D'Allaire(Canada), said that his delegation opposed the proposed amendment as it would reverse what had been established UNCITRAL practice since 1974.
Mr. Shah(Nepal) said that his delegation opposed the inclusion of the proposed item in the agenda because the question of China's representation in the United Nations had been settled definitively by General Assembly resolution 2758 XXVI.
Mr. Gouider(Libyan Arab Jamahiyira) said that his delegation opposed the reference to any military alliance in the draft resolution.
Mr. Zackheos(Cyprus) said that his delegation opposed the inclusion of proposed agenda item 166 in the agenda of the fifty-third General Assembly because Cyprus respected the principle of sovereignty, territorial integrity and unity of States as expressed in the Charter of the United Nations, and because the question of China's representation in the United Nations had been settled definitively by General Assembly resolution 2758 XXVI.
Mr. Ri Tong Il(Democratic People's Republic of Korea) said that his delegation opposed the draft resolution, which was politically motivated and violated the principles of impartiality and selectivity.
Mr. Hayee(Pakistan) said that his delegation opposed draft resolution A/C.3/59/L.49 and country-specific resolutions on principle, as they tended to alienate the country in question and caused unnecessary ill will.
Mr. Field(United States of America),supported by Ms. Schmidt(Germany), said that his delegation opposed Canada's proposal to replace the words"six months" in draft article 20, paragraphs 3 and 4, with the words"three months.
Mr. Xie Bohua(China) said that his delegation opposed the practice of selectivity and double standards on human rights issues through country-specific resolutions, which increased confrontation and led to greater division among Member States.
Mr. Khazaee(Islamic Republic of Iran),speaking in explanation of vote before the voting, said that his delegation opposed the continued practice of adopting country-specific draft resolutions, which was in breach of the principles of universality, objectivity and non-selectivity.
Mr. Dukali(Libyan Arab Jamahiriya) said that his delegation opposed country-specific resolutions and supported the principles which underlay the establishment of the Human Rights Council.
Mr. Winnick(United States of America), speaking in explanation of vote before the vote, said that his delegation opposed the draft resolution because his country regarded economic sanctions as a legitimate instrument of foreign policy, to press for a change in unacceptable international behaviour.
Mr. Mekdad(Syrian Arab Republic) said that his delegation opposed the inclusion of the item in the agenda, since the issue had been resolved by General Assembly resolution 2758 XXVI.
Mr. Yagob(Libyan Arab Jamahiriya) said that his delegation opposed extrajudicial executions but felt that the draft resolution had certain weak points.
Mr. KHARRAZI(Islamic Republic of Iran) said that his delegation opposed the inclusion of item 158, as the question had already been settled in 1971 by General Assembly resolution 2758 XXVI.
Mr. Pak Tok Hun(Democratic People's Republic of Korea) said that his delegation opposed the politicization of human rights and interference in the internal affairs of States; therefore, it would vote against the draft resolution.
Mr. Kim Song(Democratic People's Republic of Korea) said that his delegation opposed country-specific resolutions and was deeply concerned at the lack of justice and impartiality demonstrated when addressing the issue of human rights.
Mr. Lukiyantsev(Russian Federation) said that his delegation opposed the practice of submitting unilateral country-specific draft resolutions on human rights situations which, far from resolving existing problems, led to new confrontations between Member States.