Примеры использования Second authors на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
A friend warned the first and second authors that all other tenants in their building were being evacuated, and that they would soon be killed.
Works for the urban pavement of Municipality of Mercedes:the contract was concluded between the Municipality and the first and the second authors in 1969.
The first and second authors also failed to exhaust domestic remedies, as only the third author was a party to the domestic proceedings.
The State party submits that the communication is also inadmissible with regard to the first and second authors, because they are essentially claiming violations of the rights of their partnership.
The first and second authors reaffirm that the conduct of the presiding judge during the trial raised doubts about her impartiality and about whether their criminal complaint was examined by an impartial tribunal, as provided for in article 14, paragraph 1.
Further to the death sentence handed down on 6 May 2004 by the Criminal Court in Benghazi against Ashraf El-Hojouj,the first and second authors went on hunger strike in order to generate worldwide media attention.
The first and second authors left the building and moved to Tripoli during the autumn of 2004, leaving all their belongings behind, including many important documents, such as correspondence between the authors and the Palestinian embassy and several international organizations.
In the summer of 2004, a few weeks after the first verdict in the criminal trial of Ashraf El-Hojouj,the first and second authors were ordered to report to a military encampment of the Special Forces.
In addition, it submits that the first and second authors failed to take an action for"mal-judging", under article 99 of the Greek Constitution and Law No. 693/1977, requesting the competent court to consider whether the judge in question was impartial.
The authors of the communication are ViktorGottfried andJosseline RiedlRiedenstein(first and second authors), born in 1916 and in 1934 respectively, and Maria Scholtz née RiedlRiedenstein; third author. .
On 29 March 2002, the first and second authors, who reside in the settlement, filed a criminal complaint against the local associations under the Anti-Racism Law, and joined the criminal proceedings to be initiated by the Public Prosecutor as civil claimants.
The third author formerly owned a plot of land of some 2,300 square metres, also located in Aigen,adjacent to the plot owned by the first and second authors. On 15 June 1998, the fourth author purchased the plot formerly owned by the third author from a company, which had acquired it at a public auction.
The first and second authors are the parents of Ashraf El-Hojouj, a Palestinian doctor, who was arrested on 29 January 1999 on charges of premeditated murder and causing an epidemic by injecting 393 children in Al-Fatah paediatric hospital with HIV/AIDS, along with five co-accused Bulgarian nurses.
Since all domestic remedies were brought in the name of the third author and no claim related to the first and second authors personally has been substantiated for purposes of article 2 of the Optional Protocol,the first and second authors have no standing under article 1 of the Optional Protocol.
The first and second authors claim to be the victims of a violation of article 20, paragraph 2, read in conjunction with article 2, paragraphs 1 and 3(a), of the Covenant, because the Patras Court failed to appreciate the racist nature of the impugned letter and to effectively implement the Anti-Racism Law 927/1979 aimed at prohibiting dissemination of racist speech.
The Committee notes that the authors claim violations of article 26 in conjunction with article 2 of the Covenant, insofar as the Anti-Racism Law 927/79 is said to be inadequate for the purpose of protectingindividuals against discrimination and because in this case the courts application of the law failed to protect the first and second authors from discrimination based on racial origin.
The authors submit that,by denying that the first and second authors have substantiated a violation of their own rights, the State party overlooks that the right to freedom of association under article 22 is"by[its] nature inalienably linked to the person.
Since the first and second authors have been personally affected in their economic activities by the levy of annual membership dues, based on their compulsory membership in the Chamber of Commerce, they did not lose their individual rights simply because they founded a business pursuant to the requirements of domestic law, nor did they lose the right to claim these rights by means of individual petition.
On domestic remedies,the authors argue that in the absence of any specification by the State party as to which other proceedings the first and second authors could have initiated under Austrian law to claim their right to freedom of association, apart from appealing the Chamber's decision and lodging a constitutional complaint, in the name of the limited partnership, the State party's procedural objection must fail.
The second author was informed that he was a suspected terrorist.
A second author reviewed the coding, and any disagreements were resolved by the third author. .
The second author, Maria Petrova, is also an active member of the society.
The family believes that the man was mistaken for the second author.
The second author is Mrs. Pardakhon Butaeva, a Tajik national born in 1939, who submits the communication on behalf of her son, Mr. Todzhiddin Butaev, a Tajik national born in 1977.
The second author, however, has not provided any details or supporting documents in substantiation of these claims.
The second author, Mr. Nursatov, affirms that following the murder of Sanginov, several suspects were arrested, including his brother, Saidabror Askarov and the Davlatov brothers, as well as Karimov.
From 1976 to 1996, the second author worked in Cali in Colombia, as a waiter in nightclubs.
Because of his job, the second author knew many things on the Mafia's operations and the leaders' identities.
After the incident, the second author started to work for another nightclub, where he also observed illegal activities.
The RRT considered that the second author was not a credible witness and that important elements of his story were implausible and contradictory.