Примеры использования Second employee на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Second employee.
Flames are not spared and the second employee, the other trying to put out the fire.
The second employee was taken hostage by the Iraqi army from 19 August to 9 December 1990.
The total amount allegedly paid to the second employee was therefore GBP 411.
In 1996, its second employee Robert Turner joined, and other staff were soon added.
BioWare dedicated Baldur's Gate II to Daniel Walker, who died in 1999 andwas the company's second employee.
Yury Lupin isalready the second employee ofOrelenergo, awarded this year's state award.
Iraq states that Chevron U.S.A. has produced no document to support the contention that the second employee was detained until December 1990.
The second employee continued to work each day from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. to placate the Iraqi authorities until his release on 20 December 1990.
Iraq states that the"summary of expense" document furnished by Chevron U.S.A. does not bearChevron Research's name and refers only to the second employee.
After their return to the United Kingdom in December 1990, the second employee resumed work in February 1991 and the first employee resumed work at the end of March 1991.
The Panel finds that the refund should be set off against the claimed travel andliving expenses of USD 1,829 in respect of the second employee.
The second employee finally returned to the United States on 9 December 1990 and returned to work on 9 January 1991, after being granted extraordinary leave of one month.
Applying the principles referred to in paragraph 315, supra,the Panel finds that OMI has proved that it made the salary payments to the first and second employees as a direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The second employee escaped from the Iraqi authorities en route to Baghdad and made his way to Pakistan, returning to the company's base in Riyadh in the first week of October 1990.
The claim is forthe alleged payment of(a) unproductive salaries to two company employees(the"first and second employees"), and(b) a bonus payment made to the first employee's family during his detention.
The second employee was clearly taken hostage, and would be entitled to compensation in the maximum amount of USD 10,000 as determined by the Governing Council decision 8.
OMI states that it has already received payment under an insurance policy in respect of salaries paid to its two employees(the"first and second employees") while they were taken hostage by the Iraqi forces from August to December 1990.
The Panel finds that it is probable that Chevron U.S.A. received or should have received at least USD 2,000 as a refund from the relevant airline company in respect of the unused portion of the airline ticket of the second employee.
The record of payments made to the second employee indicates that he was paid a weekly salary of 720 Saudi Arabian riyals(equivalent to GBP 102) for four weeks from the week ending 11 August 1990 until the week ending 1 September 1990.
The evidence indicates that the amounts claimed were paid to both employees over the one-year period ending on 30 September 1990 in respect of the first employee andon 31 December 1990 in respect of the second employee.
Sutton seeks compensation for the salary payments it allegedly made to the second employee during the period from August 1990 to February 1991 and to the first employee from August 1990 to March 1991 as well as bonus payments allegedly made to both employees from August to December 1990.
In response to the Panel's enquiries, Chevron U.S.A. indicated that it did not know whether a partial refund had been received for the unused portion of either employee's airline ticket, butthat it seemed likely that a refund was obtained for the return portion of the second employee's air ticket.
After adjustment for ordinary annual leave, these records substantiated unproductive salary costs in respect of the first employee for the period from 2 August to 31 August 1990 in the amount of USD 6,749, andin respect of the second employee for the period from 2 August 1990 to 11 December 1990 in the amount of USD 29,090. Chevron U.S.A. provided no documentary evidence in support of the contention that the second employee was granted one month of extraordinary leave after his return to work on 11 December 1990.
The Panel recommends compensation for these two employees for the period during which they were in Iraq(i.e. from 2 August to 1 December 1990 in the case of the first employee andfrom 2 August to 14 December 1990 in the case of the second employee) in the amount of USD 44,962 GBP 23,650.
Chevron U.S.A. alleges that Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait prevented both employees from continuing with the performance of their respective employment duties from 2 August to 1 September 1990 in the case of one employee(the"first employee"), andto 9 December 1990 in the case of the other the"second employee.
In respect of these two employees, Glantre provided evidence of their employment in Iraq, detention and departure from Iraq, and salary payments(i.e. the internally-generated payroll and general ledgers). Glantre states that the first employee, the project manager,left Iraq on 1 December 1990 and that the second employee left Iraq on 14 December 1990.
A seconded employee shall also be reimbursed for travel taken on public transport except taxis.
Providing a full package of documents for seconded employees and organizations.
For this reason, the two affiliates established an intra-company practice under which Arabian Chevron seconded employees into Saudi Aramco's service, as Chevron Worldwide Service, Inc. 's contribution to the SISCO partnership's obligations under the service agreement.