Примеры использования Settlements are illegal на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Stressing that such settlements are illegal and a major obstacle to peace.
To ensure the complete removal of settlements from all occupied Arab territories in keeping with the long-standing determination by the United Nations that such settlements are illegal.
Settlements are illegal because of the fact that they are built on occupied land.
The European Union reiterates that the settlements are illegal under international law and constitute an obstacle to peace.
Settlements are illegal as they violate article 49(6) of the Fourth Geneva Convention- a unanimous finding;
Despite numerous United Nations resolutions which reaffirm that the settlements are illegal, Israel persists in pursuing this policy.
These settlements are illegal as they violate article 49, paragraph 6, of the Fourth Geneva Convention.
Successive Security Council resolutions have emphasized that Israeli policies andpractices of building settlements are illegal and are serious impediments to the achievement of a comprehensive and lasting peace.
Settlements are illegal under international law as they violate article 49, paragraph 6, of the Fourth Geneva Convention.
The wall infringes upon the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination andstrengthens Israeli settlements by facilitating their extension in disregard of the fact that those settlements are illegal under international law.
We have affirmed that settlements are illegal and must not be built on Palestinian lands.
It was the General Assembly that partitioned Mandate Palestine after it inherited the problem from the League of Nations, and it was the Security Council that adopted 25 resolutions affirming the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention to the territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem,reaffirming further in some of them that settlements are illegal and declaring the Israeli measures in Jerusalem null and void.
The EU reiterates that the settlements are illegal under international law and constitute an obstacle to peace.
The settlements are illegal under international law and their existence is dependent on the wall, which is illegal. .
The context of direct negotiations, as stated in European Union Council conclusions, must be that negotiations should be based on the pre-1967 borders, that settlements are illegal, that all final status issues are to be included in the negotiations-- including the status of Jerusalem as capital of two States-- and that both parties are to refrain from provocative actions.
Settlements are illegal, they cast doubt on the viability of the two-State solution and prejudice the final status issues.
This includes reaffirming that all legislative and administrative measures taken by Israel aimed at changing the legal status of Jerusalem and its demographic composition are legally null and void;that Israeli settlements are illegal and represent a great obstacle on the road to peace; that the plight of Palestinian refugees must be resolved through their right to return or through compensation; and that the acquisition of territory by acts of war is inadmissible.
They consider that the settlements are illegal, null and void and that they must therefore be dismantled pursuant to Security Council resolution 465 1980.
We hold Israel solely responsible for the stalemate in the negotiations process because of its insistence on continuing its settlement activities at a feverish pace instead of seeking to establish peace,despite clear international agreement on the fact that the settlements are illegal and illegitimate and despite the severe negative impact they have on the possibility of resuming negotiations and establishing a just and comprehensive peace in the region and achieving a two-State solution.
Those settlements are illegal and constitute a real threat to the peace negotiations and the two-State solution and are a blatant violation of international law.
We also reiterate that all Israeli settlements are illegal under international law and as such must neither be permitted to prejudge the outcome of final status negotiations nor should they enjoy any legitimacy from the international community.
Settlements are illegal under international law, and Israel must abide by its commitments under the road map to freeze all settlement activity and dismantle outposts erected after 2001.
We reiterate that all Israeli settlements are illegal under international law and as such must neither be permitted to prejudge the outcome of final status negotiations nor enjoy any legitimacy from the international community.
These settlements are illegal and in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, Security Council resolution 465(1980) and other relevant Security Council resolutions and should be dismantled.
The international community cannot decide that such settlements are illegal and at the same time turn a blind eye to the fact that some quarters are supporting the establishment of such settlements or developing their infrastructure or contributing to their economic flourishing.
While all settlements are illegal under international law, those new encampments are particularly shocking in the context of the ongoing peace process and the agreements reached between the two sides.
While those Israeli settlements are illegal and are condemned by the international community and by the International Court of Justice-- which stated that it was illegal to build the wall-- the Israeli Government is continuing to expand those settlements.
It must be noted that for the Palestinians, all settlements were illegal.
He reaffirmed that settlements were illegal and contrary to the road map commitments of Israel, and condemned the rocket attacks fired into Israel from Gaza.
There was a clear international consensus that the settlements were illegal and that Israel had no legitimate claim to East Jerusalem.