Примеры использования Some members pointed out на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Some members pointed out that adoption of a neutral zone will shift transitional issues elsewhere.
As regards the justiciability of the conduct under consideration, some members pointed out that aggression was an act of State and that the qualification of a particular act as aggression was a political decision.
Some members pointed out that only an analysis of the text of the objection would reveal the intention behind it.
In reviewing this issue at its present session, some members pointed out that, based on the Committee's review of the updated statistical information, annual recalculation was technically possible.
Some members pointed out that the draft articles should be compatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.
Regarding possible amendments of the rules of procedure, some members pointed out that they were necessary in the light of the concerns of States parties, although they remained flexible in respect to the possible scope of such amendments.
Some members pointed out, however, that the Organization's capacity to pay reimbursements earlier depended on the availability of adequate resources.
With regard to Focal Area I of the draft elements, some members pointed out that the title of Strategic Goal 1 had to reflect the need to improve implementation, rather than presume lack of full implementation by all Parties.
Some members pointed out the importance of integrating environmental considerations in governmental decision-making on related sectoral issues.
Noting that the question of continuity was a critical one for a career civil service, some members pointed out that in its present form the draft proposed two contradictory concepts for a continuing appointment-- one that was open-ended and the other with a time limit of five years or more.
Some members pointed out that the international community should remain vigilant and ensure that the Syrian initial declaration was exhaustive.
In this connection, some members pointed out that the Commission should examine relevant judicial decisions of national tribunals.
Some members pointed out that the adjustment was technically unsound, as it mixed income and capital concepts, and considered that it should be eliminated.
In reviewing this issue at its present session, some members pointed out that, with annual recalculation, the scale would each year be based on the most up-to-date data available and would therefore better approximate the current capacity of Member States to pay.
Some members pointed out that, in many instances, large scale-to-scale increases reflected real growth and an actual increase in the capacity to pay.
Some members pointed out that some rights that the Special Rapporteur did not seem to consider applicable should also be guaranteed to the extent possible.
Some members pointed out that in practice it was difficult to make a precise and satisfactory set of adjustments to embody those factors in the assessment formula.
Some members pointed out that the scale updated with data available in December 2012 for the 2006-2011 period indicated a further increase in the size of redistribution.
Some members pointed out the urgent need for action in the area to have sufficient time to respond to the mandate given by the Statistical Commission.
Some members pointed out that autonomy was a controversial element that should be excluded from the definition, although the nondependent nature of the acts should be acknowledged.
Some members pointed out that parties whose requests for revision of baseline data were not approved at the current time would not be precluded from resubmitting their requests.
Some members pointed out, however, that disarmament and non-proliferation issues were not a priority in many parts of the world and that there were difficulties in generating public interest.
Some members pointed out that the distinction was grounded in various international instruments, international jurisprudence and national legislation and jurisprudence.
Some members pointed out, however, that the updated scale, including data available in December 2012 for the 2006-2011 period, indicated a renewed increase in the size of redistribution.
Some members pointed out that, under international law, a State could make provision in its legislation for loss of nationality by a person who acquired the nationality of another State.
Some members pointed out that the issues of development of human resources and the promotion of agriculture should be assigned high priority within the context of achieving economic recovery and development in Africa.
Some members pointed out that these questions put into play a balancing of the interest of stopping impunity for such crimes and that of ensuring freedom of action for States at the international level.
Some members pointed out that while horizontal cooperation within a region was not so difficult, interregional cooperation needed some intermediary such as the Special Unit for TCDC or Economic and Social Commissions.
Some members pointed out that, in their view, the intention of the nuclear Powers in formulating such guarantees was to create legal effects even if non-nuclear powers members of the Conference tended to consider them as political and not legal statements.
Some members pointed out that the analysis did not find any noticeable attenuating effects of the use of special drawing rights or of any other single currency contained in the basket on the impact of excessive fluctuations of the United States dollar on the assessment rates of Member States.