Примеры использования Sulphur emission на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Sulphur emission ceilings a/.
The most significant changes were obtained for sulphur emission reductions required.
Sulphur emission ceiling for 2000.
The decrease follows the large-scale sulphur emission reductions achieved after 1986.
Sulphur emission ceilings and percentage emission reductions.
Recent results reflect the success of sulphur emission reduction measures of the past decades.
The sulphur emission at Sudbury has been reduced by> 90% since peaking in the 1960s.
During the past decades a significant reduction in sulphur emission has taken place in both Northern Europe and North America.
Sulphur emission levels, projected future emissions and emission ceilings 2000.
B/ For Greece and Portugal percentage emission reductions given are based on the sulphur emission ceilings indicated for the year 2000.
Figure V: Sulphur emission trends in the EMEP area 1980-2000, 2010, 2002.
Nitrogen saturation of soils, andsubsequent nitrate leakage, has the potential to offset the predicted recovery due to sulphur emission cuts.
Activities by ADEME relating to sulphur emission reduction technologies have already been covered in question 24.
In order to enable its accession to the 1994 Oslo Protocol,Cyprus has proposed an amendment to annex II to the Protocol specifying sulphur emission ceilings.
Figure I: Sulphur emission reductions in the ECE region, 1990-2000 based on the latest data available, see table.
Integrated pollution control authorizations(England and Wales) allow sulphur emission quotas to be switched between electricity supply plants.
The sulphur emission decrease has resulted in significantly reduced pollution in the atmosphere and in the environment as a whole.
An example of a differential QELRO is found in the 1994 Sulphur Protocol,which includes an annex specifying the sulphur emission ceiling for each Party.
Bulgaria continues sulphur emission reduction policies and has developed a National Strategy for Energy Development.
Notes with concern that some Parties to the Helsinki Protocol have not yet fulfilled their reporting obligations,in particular regarding 1993 sulphur emission data;
The sulphur emission ceilings listed in the table below give the obligations referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of article 2 of the present Protocol.
Monaco proposed to adjust annex II to the Protocol to add its name,together with emission levels, sulphur emission ceilings and percentage emission reductions.
Instead, it would concentrate on further sulphur emission reductions achieved by Parties pending the entry into force of the 1994 Oslo Protocol.
Despite these efforts, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia informed the Committee that it was not in a position to indicate a possible deadline to reach its sulphur emission target under the Protocol.
The recovery achieved by sulphur emission decreases could be offset by the net acidifying effect of nitrogen processes and leached nitrate caused by nitrogen deposition.
Other modelling work carried out at the ICP Integrated Monitoring sites has also indicated that nitrogen emission controls are very important to enable the maximum recovery in response to sulphur emission reductions.
As Canada did not submit any sulphur emission data for its SOMA for 2000, it is not possible to evaluate whether Canada has complied Insert in final report: Figure 15.
Another example is the 1994 Sulphur Protocol, which authorizes the Parties to permit two ormore Parties to jointly implement the Protocol's sulphur emission ceilings and percentage emission reductions article 2.7.
As Canada has not yet submitted any sulphur emission data for its SOMA for 2000(see table 6), it has not been possible to evaluate whether Canada has complied with its obligation as specified in article 2, paragraph 3.
Parties outside the area of EMEP would no longer be required to report their national annual sulphur emission levels, but would only be required to make such information available if requested to do so by the Executive Body;