Примеры использования The author also submits на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author also submits a copy of his cassation appeal, evidencing that he had raised all of the above issues in the domestic courts.
The author also submits that because of his ethnicity, he was presumed guilty from the very beginning of the proceedings against him.
The author also submits that the prison conditions and the detention regime and regulations to which he was subjected are contrary to articles 7 and 10 1.
The author also submits that international human rights law requires that, in defamation cases, a clear distinction is made between statements of fact and value judgments.
The author also submits that the medical officer failed to respond to complaints or take any steps to alleviate the intolerable sanitary conditions in the prison.
The author also submits that the other case alluded to by the State party is irrelevant, because it concerned an individual in pretrial detention.
The author also submits that the State party failed to explain numerous omissions in the preliminary investigation that were indicated in his initial submission.
The author also submits that the provision of Section 95(7) violates European law, but claims that individuals are barred from bringing complaints with the European Court of Justice.
The author also submits that her argument is supported by the fact that the Committee has already requested the State party to take interim measures in the present communication.
The author also submits that his brother, T.S.S., was held in illegal detention and subjected to gross ill-treatment by the Punjab police between 26 March and 2 May 1988.
The author also submits that Abdussalam Il Khwildy is a victim of a violation of article 2, paragraph 3, as he was not able to obtain any redress in Libya for the violations committed against him.
The author also submits that some of his lawyers' motions were rejected by the Supreme Court, which acted as first and last instance in his case, and that he had no right to appeal.
The author also submits that the text of the agreement of 15 June 1982 cannot supersede other formal legislation setting statutory deadlines for the filing of appeals.
The author also submits that the judge ordered the author's and other defendants' relatives to leave the court room, and they were only readmitted when the verdict was read out.
The author also submits that according to case law and legal theory, it is the lack of consent, not the element of force, that is seen as the constituent element of the offence of rape.
The author also submits that the first instance court was prejudiced against her son, under the influence of the media and high-ranking public officials, who had already declared him guilty.
The author also submits that the death penalty in Belarus is administered secretly, and neither the convict, nor his lawyers or family are informed beforehand of the date of the execution.
The author also submits that the investigating officer Mr. Sedov instructed the Head of the detention centre, in writing, not to allow the author any visitors other than members of the investigating team.
The author also submits a report dated 7 May 2002 by a specialist on personal injury law, which states that he could not successfully make a claim in negligence, based on his treatment at Parklea.
The author also submits that, according to conclusions of the pretrial investigation and the Leningrad Regional Court, he murdered Ms. N.B. after she threatened to report to the police that he had assaulted her earlier on that day.
The author also submits that, despite the fact that his relatives hired a lawyer to assist him a few days after his arrest,the latter was granted only limited access to him, and on numerous occasions he was interrogated in the absence of his lawyer.
The author also submits that according to articles 917 and 918 of the Criminal Procedure Code, a case can be re-opened based on new circumstances only if the Prosecutor's office submits to the court a conclusion that such new circumstances exist.
The author also submits that, based on his fellowship experience in some of the European Union countries, in order to be eligible to apply for positions, it is necessary to present, among other things,"criminal certificates" from all countries of citizenship and countries where they have lived for more than six months.
The author also submits that in November 2009 she had a meeting with the head of the Specialist Integration Service(Integrationsfachdienst, IFD) and a representative of the Cologne Integration Office from the Rhineland Regional Authority, at which she reported"discrimination against disabled people in their integration into the labour market.
The author also submitted reports from Human Rights Watch, the International Crisis Group and Amnesty International, as well as articles from Radio Free Europe.
The author also submitted a transcript of the Security Court decision in which his brother was sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment for his connections with the PKK.
The author also submitted that she has practically no opportunity to leave the property due to the high risk of infection and mobility problems.
The author also submitted a letter from her husband in which he threatened her and insisted that Fatoumata should become a"true Muslim", i.e., undergo excision.
After the Constitutional Court verdict, the author also submitted an application to the European Court of Human Rights, which was declared inadmissible on 8 December 1997.
The author also submitted that the principle of equal treatment has been violated through the dismissal of a female employee for her alleged extra-marital affair at work.