Примеры использования Their foreign policy на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The program's leading countries will get the opportunity to diversify their foreign policy interests.
As the United States is the sole superpower in the world today, their foreign policy and not their internal policy is essentially more important for the proletariat and the people of the world.
States continue to pragmatically use intervention as their foreign policy tools.
The Parties shall coordinate their foreign policy and common positions on fundamental international questions, and shall cooperate in ensuring security, guarding borders and combating crime.
Unfortunately, not all States have refrained from using force to secure their foreign policy and economic interests.
The member States shall agree upon and coordinate their foreign policy positions regarding international and regional security problems, using, inter alia, the consultation mechanisms and procedures of the Organization.
In an effort to take revenge on the forthcoming elections for Congress in 2018,"donkeys" will fight for preserving their foreign policy heritage.
It is well known that Syria has always been in the forefront of countries whose respect for international legitimacy constitutes a principled position in their foreign policy. We agree with the Secretary-General about the necessity of avoiding unilateral measures and resorting instead to working within the framework of the United Nations, which represents international legitimacy.
More alarming are the various cases in which certain permanent members of the Council have attempted to downgrade that body into a mere tool of their foreign policy.
In particular, the importance of coordinated actions of Georgia and Ukraine in their foreign policy before the September summit of NATO in Wales was noticed.
On one side, it's attracting Azerbaijan and Belarus to more close contacts with EU,that will be presented to these states as an opportunity to diversify their foreign policy.
I emphasize that only because I have the impression that-- while I respect the views of Member States vis-à-vis a word here or there that could have political meaning for their foreign policy-- in the interests of multilateralism, we have to take up our responsibility to assume the function that was given to the Commission.
Yet those States often supported authoritarian regimes, on the grounds that those regimes opposed communism and defended market freedoms, orused non-democratic means to achieve their foreign policy goals.
Expresses deep concern at the activities of certain Governmental andNGOs which are supported by government that are used by their sponsors to attack OIC Member States for political purposes and meet their foreign policy objectives in international fora especially the Commission on Human Rights and its Subsidiary Organs and encourages OIC Member States to coordinate in order to discourage such activities.
In summing up the discussion held during the workshop, the Chairperson concluded that unilateral coercivemeasures were regarded by States or a group of States that resorted to them as an instrument of their foreign policy.
The cynicism of the US policy of double standards indicates at the fact that the current leaders of the US,EU and NATO in their foreign policy work in the mode of a tough dictator, based on their own interests.
The member-states coordinate and harmonize their foreign policy positions on international and regional security problems, using, primarily, consultation mechanisms. The member-states join their forces in the fight against international terrorism, religious extremism, illicit trafficking of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, weapons, transnational organized crime, illegal migration and other threats to the security of the member-states.
It's important, that this course of events, besides Latvia, is favorable to the Eastern partners too,capable to diversify their foreign policy, as well as to Russia and the European Union.
According to the author, the diplomatic resolution of international crises during this period suggests that European governments viewed the war only as a last resort,an undesirable way to implement their foreign policy goals.
Expresses deep concern over the activities of certain Governmental andNongovernmental Organizations which are supported by governments that use them to attack OIC Member States for political purposes and to further their foreign policy objectives in international forums, especially the Commission on Human Rights and its Subsidiary Organs; and urges OIC Member States to coordinate in order to discourage such activities.
Possible approaches might be to deal with items on a biennial or triennial basis, group items in clusters and make full use of the Main Committees, leaving the plenary assembly to operate not as another committee butas a forum for Member States to set forth their foreign policy at the highest level.
What Moscow seeks is domination, as in the Soviet times when Warsaw Pact countries were only satellites who could neither choose their foreign policy orientation, nor decide about their internal organization.
Only States which were based on democratic structures and values were able to ensure the promotion and protection of all human rights andfundamental freedoms within their territory and to promote, through their foreign policy, the global fulfilment of those rights.
The Cambodian side expressed its elation at the important achievements recorded by the Vietnamese people in their cause of renovation and in the furtherance of their foreign policy of independence, sovereignty and openness.
However, this last point elicited various criticisms from several members of the Commission, who took the view that that interpretation might encroach on"certain accepted ways whereby States led their foreign policy and convinced other States to join in that policy. .
Accusations against such a policy are characteristic of totalitarian regimes, which rely on social and national oppression in their internal policy andon aggression and expansion in their foreign policy, contravening the global spirit of democratization in Europe.
Expresses deep concern over any activities which may be carried out by certain Governmental andNongovernmental Organizations which are supported by governments that use them to attack OIC Member States for political purposes and to further their foreign policy objectives in international forums.
On paragraph 2, concerning fraud, and in particular on the comment by the Special Rapporteur that fraud could be committed by omission,the same view held that this might encroach on certain accepted ways whereby States led their foreign policy and convinced other States to join in that policy. .
This has led our Governments to rethink their national planning policies and to reformulate their foreign policies so as to respond to the new requirements.
Only national Governments, through their foreign policies, could influence such organizations to respect the right of all to food.