Примеры использования Their nuclear programmes на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Some of them continue to modernize their nuclear programmes in violation of the Treaty.
In order to reinforce security and peace,all States in the region must apply IAEA safeguards to all their nuclear programmes.
The decision of India andPakistan to pursue their nuclear programmes challenged the very spirit of the non-proliferation regime.
Their nuclear programmes therefore are not merely an internal matter for the two countries, but are a legitimate matter of concern for the world.
It should be in the interest of member States to provide clear evidence that their nuclear programmes are of a peaceful nature.
Notwithstanding UNSC demands, their nuclear programmes cause instability both in the Middle East and Northeast Asia, as well as around the globe.
It is well known that Japan is one of the few countries that are expediting their nuclear programmes even since the end of the cold war.
NPT article IV does not provide States parties that have violated the non-proliferation provisions of the Treaty any protection from the consequences of these violations,including the imposition of punitive measures against their nuclear programmes.
The Conference calls upon the concerned States to accede to the Treaty and to place all their nuclear programmes and facilities under full-scope IAEA safeguards forthwith.
States parties recognized that such undertakings will enhance the confidence of States parties andhelps eliminate concerns regarding their nuclear programmes.
A climate of cooperation in the international community at large would encourage States to provide objective guarantees that their nuclear programmes were being used for exclusively peaceful purposes, and to take other confidence-building measures.
Underscore that IAEA is the sole international organization responsible for inspections andverifying declarations of States with regard to their nuclear programmes;
Israel's leaders give no indication that they are prepared to accede to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons or to place their nuclear programmes under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and this leaves no room for any assurance that they have no hostile intentions towards the region and its peoples.
Here we witness the absence of a single standard: some countries are punished by military force,while others are simply urged to give up their nuclear programmes.
A category of nuclear missiles has been completely prohibited,several countries have renounced their nuclear arsenals or their nuclear programmes and have joined the NPT as non-nuclear-weapon States.
Nor does article IV provide States Parties that have violated their non-proliferation obligations under the Treaty any protection from the consequences of such breach, including the imposition of appropriate measures by other States,jointly or separately, against their nuclear programmes.
He recognized the right of all States to utilize nuclear power for peaceful purposes and urged all parties to improve transparency andto cooperate fully with regard to their nuclear programmes, in accordance with the NPT and other international instruments, so as to build confidence among States.
The Conference states that Article IV does not provide States Parties that have violated the non-proliferation provisions of the Treaty any protection from the consequences of these violations,including the imposition of measures against their nuclear programmes.
Ms. Mishar(Malaysia), reaffirming her country's commitment to non-proliferation and the central role of IAEA in nuclear safeguards and verification activities, called on all States to abide by their safeguards agreements;to exercise full transparency in their nuclear programmes, which should be subject to IAEA comprehensive safeguards and additional protocols; and to fully comply with the provisions of the NonProliferation Treaty.
The Six-Party Talks afford a forum in which to make real progress towards the dismantlement of North Korea's existing nuclear weapons and all their nuclear programmes.
The extension sends the wrong signal to the nuclear States non-parties to the Treaty that they can extend the ambiguity surrounding their nuclear programmes indefinitely, regardless of the consequences.
It was difficult to be optimistic about early action by the four non-parties, Cuba, India, Israel andPakistan, yet restraint in their nuclear programmes was essential.
We also urge the nuclear States to unconditionally provide countries with the material, scientific equipment andtechnology required to continue their nuclear programmes.
Some countries are defying NPT obligations, in one case even conducting nuclear tests, and are refusing to cooperate fully with the International Atomic Energy Agency(IAEA) orto allow the IAEA to verify that their nuclear programmes are of a peaceful nature.
The role of IAEA should be enhanced, and universalization of the Treaty should be achieved by calling on all States that had not yet acceded to the Treaty, including Israel,to accede to it as non-nuclear-weapon States and submit their nuclear programmes and facilities to IAEA safeguards.
Her Government supported the right of all countries to peaceful uses of nuclear energy and technology under article IV of the Treaty, on the condition that they met the responsibilities which came with that right andprovided assurances that their nuclear programmes were intended for peaceful ends.
We hope that all States parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons(NPT) will comply with their obligations under its provisions and their safeguards agreement, and will work closely with the IAEA toresolve any doubts and questions concerning their nuclear programmes through negotiation and constructive dialogue.
Taking note with appreciation of the declarations issued at the highest level by the Governments of South Asian States that are developing their peaceful nuclear programmes, reaffirming their undertaking not to acquire or manufacture nuclear weapons and to devote their nuclear programmes exclusively to the economic and social advancement of their peoples.
Taking note with appreciation of the declarations issued at the highest level by the Governments of South Asian States that are developing their peaceful nuclear programmes, reaffirming their undertaking not to acquire or manufacture nuclear weapons and to devote their nuclear programmes exclusively to the economic and social advancement of their peoples.
We urge States that have not yet become parties to the Treaty, and nuclear-weapon States in particular, to accede to the Treaty as soon as possible so that their nuclear facilities can be subjected to International Atomic Energy Association(IAEA)safeguards and so that they undertake to carry out their nuclear programmes within the framework of the non-proliferation regime.