Примеры использования These two persons на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
How do these two persons relate to each other?
Thus, it became apparent that at least one of these two persons was not Counsellor Supuwood.
These two persons have not been charged.
The Government reported that these two persons were not under detention.
These two persons are said to have been released following their forced conversion.
Into this holy estate, these two persons present now come to be joined.
The source made no observations on the information provided by the Government of Rwanda that these two persons were found in prison.
It adds that these two persons"are not being held at present.
The Working Group clarified two cases on the basis of the information provided by the Government referring that these two persons had been released on bail on 15 February 1999.
ICJ welcomed that these two persons were awarded 3 million SEK each in 2008.
The Special Rapporteur welcomes the release of these two journalists, thanks the Government for the information it provided butnevertheless hopes to receive more detailed information about the sentencing of these two persons for defamation.
Limit for donations was GEL 100 thousand and these two persons divided the whole amount among 11 different companies.
These two persons had been living in the country for many years before their sentencing, were married to Belarusian citizens and whose children were also Belarusian citizens.
In September 1997, the Government confirmed the arrest of these two persons and four others in the circumstances stated above.
Subsequently, these two persons were transferred to Riyadh, where they are currently being held in detention in Al Alicha Prison.
Moreover, the recommendation by the Human Rights Division of the Attorney-General's Office that these two persons should be dismissed was not implemented, since they retired from the army at their own request.
At the time these two persons were arrested, the institution of preventive custody had no constitutional foundation.
The Federal Government took this unusual step in order to make it clear that it was no longer prepared to accept the continuing right-wing extremist statements with which these two persons called in public for the fight against the free democratic basic order.
It was further reported that these two persons have been denied legal counsel and adverted not try to ask for legal assistance.
That decision was motivated by the fact that the Working Group had before it two contradictory versions: That of the source, according to which Kang Jung Sok and Ko Sang Mun had been detained in 1990 at the Sungho Detention Centre,and that of the Government, according to which these two persons were not currently detained.
June 2008: The Police presented these two persons before the Public Prosecutor, who requested the Judge for a 10-day extension of their detention.
These two persons have been denied the possibility to consult with a lawyer and continue to be detained without having been charged or presented to any judicial authority.
The Government of Rwanda also pointed out that the rights of these two persons would be respected in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
As a result these two persons were withdrawn from active duty and rendered available for disciplinary action Region Decision No. 98-2000-XI-RPNP/OFAD-UP of 20 ctober 2000.
In his reply to the Special Rapporteur's letter of 15 August 1994, the Minister of Foreign Affairs stated that, since these two persons were Croatian citizens fit for military service, they had the rights and duties provided for in the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia and the Law on Defence, which duties included military service.
These two persons voluntarily went to the Office of the Tokyo Public Prosecutor, submitted the evidence they had gathered, and offered their cooperation in the eventual public investigation they were requesting.
The source is surprised that a preventive custody request should have been filed after the arrest of these two persons, given that in 2006, one year before Mr. Tomintat Marx Yu and Mr. Zhu Wei Yi were arrested, an important legal precedent was set when the Supreme Court of Justice had ruled that preventive custody was unconstitutional.
The detention of these two persons, in the circumstances, constitutes a violation of those rights, so that the Working Group considers it to have been arbitrary, in accordance with Category II of its methods of work.
Consequently, the Working Group may conclude that these two persons have acted in the framework of their capacities as active members and investigators of the environmental organization Greenpeace.
It was reported that these two persons were arrested on 22 and 23 June 2008, respectively, by agents of the Iranian Police who did not shown arrest warrants.