Примеры использования To extremist activity на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Public incitement to extremist activity(art. 280);
According to our data, one inappropriate sentence was issued under Article 280 of the Criminal Code(public incitement to extremist activity) during the period under review.
Six cases only involved Article 280(“public incitement to extremist activity”); two people were sentenced under the aggregation of Articles 282 and 280.
The first one now includes 235 items and lists resources recognized as extremist; the second one contains 219 items representing the pages blocked for incitement to extremist activity or calls for unauthorized public actions.
It reformed Articles 280("public incitement to extremist activity"), 2821("organization of an extremist community") and 2822("organization of an extremist group").
According to the definition in the 2002 Law,any- even merely technical- assistance to extremist activity is also qualified as extremism.
Igor Stenin, the leader of the informal"The Russians of Astrakhan" movement, posted a comment on the VKontakte social network in support of Ukraine andwas sentenced to 2 years of imprisonment for making public calls to extremist activity.
Punishable, in particular, are public appeals to extremist activity(see article 280 of the Criminal Code).
Evidently having decided not to rest on their laurels, law enforcement agencies opened another case against the poet in July- this time under Part 2 of Article 280(public calls to extremist activity committed with the use of the Internet).
Andrey Kutuzov, a left-wing activist, was convicted under the Criminal Code Article 280("public incitement to extremist activity"), and received a two-year suspended sentence for distributing leaflets, which called for violence against the police.
Internationally, ACF provides trainings on both intervention methods and community engagement strategies andthus supports institutions to become more aware of how to best build community resilience to extremist activity.
For example, one of the defendants in the Chelyabinsk case was also found guilty under Part 1 of the Criminal Code Article 280(public incitement to extremist activity) solely on the basis of sharing a video that called for boycott of the elections.
She has been charged under the Criminal Code Articles 280(public incitement to extremist activity) and 280.1(public incitement to action aimed at violating the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation) on the basis of several social network publications.
The law on mass media only prohibits the citizens,who are serving prison sentences or have a previous conviction for“committing crimes related to extremist activity,” to act as founders and editors-in-chief of media outlets.
Danil Alferiev, a Left Bloc activist from Ulyanovsk, even managed to win a payout of 200 thousand rubles for illegal criminal prosecution against him under Article 282 Part 1(incitement to hatred) andArticle 280 Part 1(public incitement to extremist activity) of the Criminal Code.
In its actions, the occupation authorities rely on the so-called"law of the DPR""On counteraction to extremist activity," which, as in Russia, is often usedto curtail the religious activity of unwanted believers or religious associations as a whole.
An investigator from the regional FSB department found no“extremist” motive in the actions of Lydia Bainova, a resident of Abakan(Republic of Khakassia),charged under Article 280 Part 2 of the Criminal Code(public incitement to extremist activity via the Internet) for an angry online statement.
We consider this definition-“officially registered attributes and symbolism of an organization, for which the court judgment on its liquidation orprohibition due to extremist activity is in force”- to be infelicitous, since organizations that have a real chance to be banned due to extremist activities, usually don't register their symbols, and are unlikely to do so in the future.
The sentence passed by the Syktyvkar Magistrate Court, finding a publisher of 7x7 online magazine guilty under Article 13.15 Part 6 of the Administrative Code(production or publishing of media,containing incitement to extremist activity) with a fine of 15 thousand rubles.
As usual, Article 282 was utilized in most of the sentences(47 out of 50, Part 2 in three of them);three cases only involved Article 280(“public incitement to extremist activity”); in three additional cases people were sentenced under the aggregation of Articles 282 and 280.
Nevertheless, we would like to note that, in our opinion, the fragments of the materials distributed by Lukin and Kuznetsova that are cited in the expert opinion, which formed the basis for the charge and the verdict,can be interpreted neither as calls to extremist activity nor as hate speech.
In case of Article 280, however, utilizing the media(and, according to the proposed bill, the Internet as well) constitutes a qualifying clause,so that any call to extremist activity on the Internet would have to be punished under this article by nothing less than imprisonment for up to five years.
In addition, in four cases in which the charges included a combination of Part 1 of Article 282 with another article(for example Article 280 on calls to extremist activity), the charges under Article 282 Part 1 were dismissed and the verdicts were issued only on other charges.
Charges of Separatism, Public Calls to Extremist Activities, and Incitement to Hatred.
On 10 January 2011,the Ministry of Information charged Avtoradio with disseminating information that allegedly contained public appeals to extremist activities.
In 2013, 49 individuals were convicted under article 280, paragraph 1, of the Criminal Code of public incitement to extremist activities, while 2 persons were convicted under article 280, paragraph 2, of similar offences using the media.
However, the court understood the leaflets as a public incitement to extremist activities. In January 2010 the criminal charges were filed, and in August V. Drezner was sentenced to a fine of 100 thousand rubles.
In June, the Toropets District Court of the Tver Region issued a verdict in the case of local resident Vladimir Egorov,charged with public incitement to extremist activities via the Internet(Article 280 Part 2 of the Criminal Code).
The Unified Register of Banned Websites blocked by the court decisions as well as the list of websites blocked extrajudicially by the Prosecutor General's Office under the Lugovoy Law(i.e. for incitement to extremist activities or unauthorized public actions) continued to grow actively.
With respect to the use of new information technologies for extremist activities, reference was made to the applicability of the Law on information, computerization and protection of information and to the Law on countering extremist activities to cases of extremist activities, such as the distribution and publication of extremist materials andpublic incitement to extremist activities.