Примеры использования To render an opinion на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In the present case, the Working Group considers it necessary to render an opinion on the arbitrary nature of the detention.
The Group is in a position to render an opinion on the facts and circumstances of the case, in the context of the allegations made and the response of the Government thereto.
It should be recalled that the Working Group does not have a mandate to render an opinion about the fairness of the charges made against detainees.
The Group is in a position to render an opinion on the facts and circumstances of the case, in the context of the allegations made and the response of the Government thereto, as well as the observations by the source.
The Working Group considers that it is in a position to render an opinion on the basis of the information available to it.
After having examined both the allegations by the source and the Government's reply, and noting that the source has sent no observations in response, the Working Group considers that it does not possess sufficiently precise andconsistent information to render an opinion on the case.
According to its revised methods of work, the Working Group is in a position to render an opinion on the basis of the submissions that have been made.
The Working Group considers that to render an opinion it must receive additional information from both the source and the Government on the following points.
The visit to Peru did indeed enable it to obtain the background information it needed to render an opinion, as is clear from the relevant report.
The Working Group reserves the right to render an opinion, on a case-by-case basis, whether or not the deprivation of liberty was arbitrary, notwithstanding the release of the person concerned;
The Working Group considers that it does not currently have sufficiently precise andconcordant information to render an opinion on the cases of the above-mentioned persons.
The Working Group is in a position to render an opinion on the case, in the light of the allegations made, notwithstanding that the Government has failed to provide its version of facts and explanations on the circumstances of the case.
According to its revised methods of work, the Working Group is in a position to render an opinion on the case on the basis of the submissions that have been made.
In the case at hand, it is all the more necessary to render an opinion because the person concerned was not released, but apparently expelled from the country, in violation of Spanish law itself, which grants him a right of appeal which, on account of the action of State officials, he was unable to exercise.
In the absence of a response from the Government, the Working Group is able,based on its revised methods of work, to render an opinion in the light of the information submitted to it.
However, pursuant to that paragraph, the Working Group reserves the right to render an opinion, on a case-by-case basis, whether or not the deprivation of liberty was arbitrary, notwithstanding the release of the person concerned.
After having transmitted an urgent appeal to the Government, the Working Group may transmit the case through its regular procedure in order to render an Opinion on whether the deprivation of liberty was arbitrary or not.
However, pursuant to that same paragraph, the Working Group reserves the right to render an opinion, on a case-by-case basis, on whether or not the deprivation of liberty was arbitrary, notwithstanding the release of the persons concerned.
Although the methods of work of the Working Group provide that the case will be filed if the detainedperson has been released, they also empower the Group to render an opinion on whether the detention was arbitrary, if it deems it necessary.
However, pursuant to that paragraph, the Working Group reserves the right to render an opinion, on a case-by-case basis, whether or not the deprivation of liberty was arbitrary, notwithstanding the release of the person concerned.
In its opinion No. 24/1995, the Working Group decided to leave the case pending until after the planned visit to Peru,which would provide it with the necessary background information to enable it to render an opinion in accordance with its methods of work.
Notwithstanding the absence of official information,the Working Group believes that it is in a position to render an Opinion, especially since the facts and allegations contained in the communication have not been challenged by the Government.
Although Messrs. Kakabaev and Ovezov were released, in accordance with paragraph 17(a) of its methods of work andconsidering the gravity of the violations alleged, the Working Group reserves the right to render an opinion whether or not their deprivation of liberty was arbitrary.
In the absence of any information from the Government, the Working Group is in a position to render an opinion on the facts and circumstances of the case, especially since the facts and allegations contained in the communication have not been challenged.
In accordance with paragraph 23 of its methods of work,"[a]fter having transmitted an urgent appeal to the Government, the Working Group may transmit the case through its regular procedure in order to render an Opinion on whether the deprivation of liberty was arbitrary or not.
The communication shall inform the Government that the Working Group is authorized to render an Opinion determining whether the reported deprivation of liberty was arbitrary or not, if a reply is not received by the Government within the time limit granted by the Working Group to the Government.
The visit to Peru was finally carried out and did indeed enable it to obtain the background information it needed to render an opinion, as is clear from the relevant report E/CN.4/1999/63/Add.2.
Despite the absence of information from the Government,the Working Group considers that it is in a position to render an opinion on the detention of the Petitioners, in conformity with paragraph 16 of its revised methods of work.
Although Mr. Shamoun has been released, given the circumstances of the case, the Working Group considers it appropriate, in accordance with paragraph 17(a)of its Revised methods of work, to render an opinion as to whether the deprivation of liberty was arbitrary, notwithstanding the release.
In the absence of any information from the Palestinian Authority,the Working Group believes that it is in a position to render an opinion on the facts and circumstances of the case, especially since the facts and allegations contained in the communication have not been challenged.