Примеры использования To reopen the discussion на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Ms. ASSUNÇÃO(Portugal) said that her delegation acceptedthe negotiated text of article 15 and did not wish to reopen the discussion on it.
Thus, he said,it was not necessary to reopen the discussion on the Parking Programme itself.
Mr. Moollan(Mauritius) said that his intention had not been to reopen the discussion.
If the Commission decided to reopen the discussion, that proposal would be resubmitted.
Other participants expressed the view that every effort had been made to reach consensus, butthey were nevertheless willing to reopen the discussion.
In order not to reopen the discussion on the subject, he proposed to return to the first reading formulation of the draft article.
She recalled that that element has been the subject of long debate and ILO, therefore,did not want to reopen the discussion of the validity of the hypotheses used.
I would like to reopen the discussion under section five and request that Kiara be put back in the mainstream classroom with the help of a one-on-one paraprofessional aide.
It did not seem possible, however, to reopen the discussion on assignment to transport categories at the current session without an official proposal.
Since they usually preferred the law of the grantor's location to apply to enforcement,he would be ready to reopen the discussion on that point.
He wondered whether it might be necessary to reopen the discussion and include such a definition, since, as currently worded, article 33 no longer provided for such a mechanism.
However, towards the end of the reporting period there were positive signs of attempted engagement between signatories and non-signatories in order to reopen the discussions.
It is not our intention to reopen the discussion on the critical economic situation of our continent or to undertake a new diagnosis of the ills hindering the growth of African economies.
This question has been discussed several times by the working group;to date it has not been possible to put forward any recommendation to the Joint Meeting to reopen the discussion.
Should the negotiations with local Serb authorities be successful,Croatia is willing to reopen the discussion on establishing appropriate implementation and international monitoring of confidence-building mechanisms.
Any attempt to reopen the discussion on specific subtle issues would prolong the negotiations and prevent the Commission from finalizing the instruments on the draft Rules of Procedure and Evidence and the Elements of Crimes within the scheduled time limit.
Mr. Möller(Observer for Finland) said that his delegation agreed with the representatives of Croatia andthe Russian Federation that it was inadvisable to reopen the discussion on questions which had already been decided.
Although he did not wish to reopen the discussion on agenda item 116,the questions raised by his delegation under that item had not yet been answered, and he hoped that the Secretariat would provide a reply in writing.
Mr. Sorieul(Secretary of the Commission) said that the unprecedented five fullpages of notes on draft article 26, paragraph 9, combined with the comments of the delegations, had covered the issue fully, and there was no need to reopen the discussion.
Finally, it welcomed the willingness of IRU to reopen the discussion on the so called"IRU's blocking factors", which prevent IRU from supporting the eTIR Project, and took note that a meeting was planned with the UNECE secretariat on 15 February 2011.
While political will had sometimes prevailed over legal exactitude in the negotiations and the outcome was probably not ideal for any delegation,it would be unwise and counter-productive to reopen the discussion of the text submitted by the Working Group.
There was no valid reason to reopen the discussion on the appropriateness of using that term in respect of States, since the Commission had accepted aggression as a crime in its discussion on the draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind.
Mr. HOLTZMANN(United States of America) said that if the Commission expected to have sufficient time to consider future work as well as major issues in the Guide, then it ought to consideronly previously unresolved matters and not seek to reopen the discussion of any other issues on which it had already taken action.
There was not sufficient time to reopen the discussion, but he strongly urged the Government to take into account the remarks made at the preceding meeting and to endeavour to guarantee equal treatment to everyone, whether victims of the Second World War- who were not limited to victims of the Holocaust- or victims of slavery.
However, he pointed out that, in requesting together with other Member States, the inclusion of the item on the agenda of the forty-ninth session of the General Assembly, his delegation's aim had not been to force a confrontation between abolitionists andanti-abolitionist States, but to reopen the discussion on capital punishment in a constructive and cooperative spirit.
It did not, however, consider it appropriate to reopen discussion of the criteria established in 1994.
It is neither efficient nor desirable to reopen discussion on this point;