Примеры использования Victim of enforced disappearance на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author claims that his brother became a victim of enforced disappearance on 1 June 1995.
Djamel Saadoun became the victim of enforced disappearance, since no information was subsequently given to his family on where he was detained or what had happened to him.
The two mechanisms had granted 3,195 persons the status of victim of enforced disappearance and extrajudicial execution.
He claims that, as a victim of enforced disappearance, he was prevented in fact from exercising his right of appeal to contest the legality of his detention.
She recalls that the Committee has accepted that being the victim of enforced disappearance may constitute inhuman or degrading treatment.
Moreover, as a victim of enforced disappearance, he was physically unable to challenge the legality of his detention or to apply to a judge to request his release.
The author claims that the facts supporting her petition demonstrate that her husband has been a victim of enforced disappearance since his arrest on 30 May 1994 and that he remains so to date.
The author also claims that, as a victim of enforced disappearance, Kamel Djebrouni was denied the protection of the law, in violation of article 16 of the Covenant.
On 9 June 2009, the Working Group sent a communication regarding the intimidation suffered by the members of the family of a victim of enforced disappearance on the eve of the trial of the alleged perpetrator.
As a general principle, no victim of enforced disappearance shall be presumed dead over the objections of the family.
In its general comments on article 19 of the Declaration,the Working Group made it clear that,"as a general principle, no victim of enforced disappearance shall be presumed dead over the objections of the family.
The author also maintains that, as a victim of enforced disappearance, Maamar Ouaghlissi was materially unable to exercise his right to challenge the lawfulness of his detention.
If the definition of enforced disappearance relied only on those circumstances occurring together, and not on intent to remove the person from the protection of the law,then anyone who was arrested could claim to be a victim of enforced disappearance.
Moreover, as a victim of enforced disappearance, he was physically unable to appeal against the legality of his detention or to apply to a judge to request his release.
In this case, the victim was sentenced to life imprisonment in absentia after a closed trial, by a court of special jurisdiction made up of anonymous judges, without ever being heard,as he had been a victim of enforced disappearance since his arrest a year previously and without any investigation being conducted to establish his fate.
As a victim of enforced disappearance, Bouzid Mezine was, de facto, prevented from exercising his right to challenge the legality of his detention, as guaranteed under article 2, paragraph 3, of the Covenant.
She claims that, as the victim of enforced disappearance, her son has been denied the right to an effective remedy for his arbitrary detention and the various violations he has suffered.
As a victim of enforced disappearance, Ismail Al Khazmi was de facto prevented, in violation of article 2, paragraph 3, of the Covenant, from exercising his right of recourse to challenge the lawfulness of his detention.
The author considers that her son has been a victim of enforced disappearance in violation of article 2, paragraph 3; article 6, paragraph 1; article 7; article 9, paragraphs 1 to 4; article 10, paragraph 1; and article 16 of the Covenant.
As a victim of enforced disappearance, Djaafar Sahbi was prevented from exercising his right to challenge the lawfulness of his detention, in violation of article 2, paragraph 3, of the Covenant.
The author further points out that, as a victim of enforced disappearance, his father was denied the right to be recognized as the subject of rights and obligations, in other words, as a human being deserving of respect.
As a victim of enforced disappearance, Abdelmotaleb Abushaala was de facto prevented, in violation of article 2, paragraph 3, of the Covenant, from exercising his right of recourse to challenge the lawfulness of his detention.
The authors claim that Ibrahim Durić has been a victim of enforced disappearance since his illegal arrest by the Vojska Republike Srpske on 14 May 1992 and that, despite numerous efforts on their part, no prompt, impartial, thorough and independent investigation has been carried out by the State party to clarify his fate and whereabouts and to bring the perpetrators to justice.
As a victim of enforced disappearance, Maamar Ouaghlissi has been deprived of the protection of the law by reason of the refusal of those responsible for his disappearance to reveal his fate and whereabouts and to admit that he has been deprived of his liberty.
The authors claim that Mensud Rizvanović is a victim of enforced disappearance at the hands of the VRS since his illegal arrest on 20 July 1992, and that despite their numerous efforts, no prompt, impartial, thorough and independent investigation has been carried out by the State party to clarify his fate and whereabouts and to bring the perpetrators to justice.
As a victim of enforced disappearance, he was not physically able to appeal against the lawfulness of his detention, or to request a judge to order his release or even to ask an outside third party to defend him in court; this situation constitutes a violation of article 9, paragraph 4, of the Covenant.
The author also asserts that his father was a victim of enforced disappearance between the time of his arrest in 1990 and the time when his family first received news of him in 2001, that is, for 11 years, and then again from the time when the authorities again denied that he was being held after he had finished serving his sentence in 2003 until his release in April 2008.
He adds that, as a victim of enforced disappearance, he was deprived of the protection of the law, and his right to recognition as a person before the law was denied, in violation by the State party of article 16 of the Covenant.
Given that locating a victim of enforced disappearance was a time-sensitive matter that could not await the exhaustion of domestic remedies, the Committee had a unique humanitarian mandate allowing it to ask authorities to search for victims upon the request of a victim's relative.