Примеры использования Which dismissed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Dallah appealed to the Court of Appeal, which dismissed Dallah's appeal.
On 11 January 1995,the District Court(Landesgericht Salzburg) dismissed the authors' claim. On 24 October 1995, the authors' appeal was rejected by the Higher Court of Appeal(Oberlandesgericht Linz). On 12 December 1995, the authors appealed to the Supreme Court(Oberster Gerichtshof), which dismissed the appeal on 27 March 1996.
She appealed this decision to the Prague Municipal Court, which dismissed her complaint on 16 June 1998.
The author appealed this decision to the Court of Appeal for Ontario, which dismissed the appeal on 18 October 1993, on the grounds that the University followed its proper procedures and applied its usual standards; and that the trial judge had found, on the evidence before him, that there was sufficient factual foundation to justify the University's decision.
The defendant appealed to the RA Criminal Court of Appeal, which dismissed the complaint.
Люди также переводят
He appealed to the Linz Court of Appeal, which dismissed the appeal on 19 February 2003 on the basis that the newly discovered evidence was inadmissible.
Later, this rejection was appealed in the city court which dismissed the motion.
On the same day the case was submitted to the European Commission which dismissed the complaint on admissibility grounds i.e. the complainant's failure to challenge the District Court's judgement of 7 January 1997.
The author had applied for review of the Board's decision to the Divisional Court of Ontario, which dismissed his application.
The author appealed the order of the Court to the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam, which dismissed the appeal on 31 March 1993, while setting aside the Regional Court's first consideration.
The adverse first instance ruling was upheld by the First Chamber of the Federal Social Security Court, which dismissed the case.
The Commission decided to refer the matter to the Human Rights Tribunal, which dismissed the complaint on 5 September 1985 on the grounds that the plaintiff had not proved discrimination.
The author filed an appeal for unification of doctrine before the Employment Division of the High Court, which dismissed it on 10 June 1997.
The author appealed this decision before the Madrid Provincial Court, which dismissed his appeal on 3 February 2006. On 16 March 2006, the author submitted an application for amparo to the Constitutional Court against the decision of the Madrid Provincial Court.
The author subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court(Hoge Raad), which dismissed his appeal on 11 December 1991.
The Committee observes that the question presented by the jurors' affidavits was raised on appeal before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which dismissed the petition.
The author filed an appeal with the Eighteenth Section of the Provincial High Court of Madrid, which dismissed the appeal on 27 September 1993, on the same grounds as the Madrid Court No. 6 of First Instance.
The author and his co-defendant were arrested on 23 January 1985 and charged four days later with the murder of one C. S. On 8 November 1985, both were convicted and sentenced to death in the Bridgetown Assizes Court.On 20 November 1985, the author appealed to the Court of Appeal of Barbados, which dismissed the appeal on 31 May 1988.
The authors appealed to the Frostating Court of Appeal, which dismissed the appeal on 15 December 1995.
On 20 March 1997, the author filed a Petition for Review in the Supreme Court, which dismissed it on 23 July 1997, for"failure by the petitioner to sufficiently show that the respondent court had committed any reversible error in rendering the questioned judgement.
The priest contested this ruling at the Criminal Court of Appeals, which dismissed the complaint on September 7.
On 14 August 2006, the author appealed the decision of the Vitebsk District Court to the Vitebsk Regional Court, which dismissed the appeal on 20 September 2006. On 25 September 2006, she filed an appeal with the Supreme Court, which upheld the decision of the Vitebsk Regional Court on 10 November 2006.
Subsequently, S. Foods sought special leave to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which dismissed the appeal on 20 January 1992.
He then applied for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, which dismissed the application on 30 June 1988.
The author then appealed(amparo)to the Constitutional Court(Tribunal Constitucional), which dismissed his appeal on 20 October 2004.
As to the claim that the Spanish Minister for Foreign Affairs disobeyed a judicial order(mandato judicial),the State party indicates that this claim was brought by the complainant before the Tribunal Supremo, which dismissed the claim on the grounds that under Spanish law, as interpreted by the Tribunal Supremo, there was no such judicial order that the Minister was bound to obey.
The decision to declare a state of emergency was challenged in the Constitutional Court, which dismissed the challenge on 8 March 2000.
The complainant appealed against this decision to the Federal Administrative Tribunal, which dismissed his appeal on 12 February 2009.
On 24 October 2007, the author appealed to the Employment Appeals Tribunal, which dismissed his application on 19 December 2007.
On 26 October 2016, UNESCO's World Heritage Committee passed a controversial resolution on Temple Mount which dismissed Israeli connections to the location.