Примеры использования Working group heard statements на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
At the third session, the Working Group heard statements by 31 delegations.
The Working Group heard statements regarding work undertaken by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization(UNESCO) and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development(UNCTAD) in the field of electronic commerce.
At the fourth session, the Working Group heard statements by nine delegations. It adopted its report on 28 May 1999.
The Working Group heard statements from representatives of the European Union, who gave assurances that it remained committed to achieving 0.7 per cent of gross national income for ODA by 2015, despite the recent debt crisis afflicting many States members of the European Union.
At its 6th and8th meetings, the Working Group heard statements by the observers for Colombia, Cuba, Mexico and Senegal.
At the 1st meeting, the Working Group heard statements by the representatives of the European Union, Switzerland, China, the United States of America, Japan, Australia, Brazil, Thailand, Argentina, Indonesia, India, South Africa, Malaysia, Ghana, Costa Rica, Canada, Turkey, the Philippines, the Netherlands, Bangladesh, Pakistan, El Salvador and Uruguay.
At its 2nd meeting,on 30 July, the Working Group heard statements by the representatives of the Philippines, Kenya, the Dominican Republic, Slovenia, Thailand, Denmark and Argentina.
Under agenda item 3, the Working Group heard statements from the representatives of the following States: Norway, Colombia, United States, Nigeria, Israel, Belarus, Switzerland, Canada, Mexico, Poland, Belgium, Italy, Brazil, Namibia, Argentina, Russian Federation, Spain and France.
Under agenda item 4, the Working Group heard statements by the observers for Europol, the Organization of American States and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
Under agenda item 6, the Working Group heard statements from the representatives of the following States: Oman, Philippines, Peru, Israel, Albania, Nigeria, Argentina, Germany, Brazil, Indonesia, Qatar and United Arab Emirates.
At its 1st meeting, on 1 August, the Working Group heard statements by the representatives of the following Member States: Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Israel, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, the Russian Federation, the United States of America and Uruguay.
Under agenda item 5, the Working Group heard statements from the representatives of the following States: Egypt, Netherlands, Belarus, Jordan, Israel, Philippines, Germany, Russian Federation, Austria, Australia, Argentina, Peru, Canada, Nigeria, Namibia, Mexico, Indonesia, United States, Brazil, Panama, United Kingdom and Algeria.
At its 9th meeting, on 14 February, the Working Group heard statements by the President of the General Assembly at its fiftieth session, Mr. Diogo Freitas do Amaral, and the President of the General Assembly at its forty-eighth session, Mr. Samuel R. Insanally, who discussed the functions and role of the office of the President of the General Assembly.
At the 1st meeting, the Working Group heard statements by the representatives of the European Union, Chile, Brazil, Japan, Argentina, Guatemala, Peru, India, Indonesia, Egypt, Slovenia, El Salvador, Turkey, Switzerland, Mexico, the Islamic Republic of Iran, South Africa, Malawi, the Russian Federation, the United States, Canada, Albania, Costa Rica and Germany.
Under agenda item 4, the Working Group heard statements from the representatives of the following States: Nigeria, Ecuador, Estonia, Lebanon, Belarus, Israel, Philippines, United States, Poland, Netherlands, Brazil, United Kingdom, Mexico, Argentina, Kenya, Namibia, Dominican Republic, Australia, Chile, Peru, United Arab Emirates and France.
The Working Group heard statements from the representatives of the following States: Colombia, Azerbaijan, Argentina, Belarus, Montenegro, Netherlands, Namibia, Panama, Philippines, Austria, United States, Canada, Israel, Kuwait, Norway, Egypt, Belgium, Indonesia, Qatar, Lebanon, Estonia, Russian Federation, Algeria, Chile, Peru, United Arab Emirates and Brazil.
At its 1st meeting,on 30 July, the Working Group heard statements by the representatives of the European Union, the United States of America, Japan, Brazil, Colombia, Turkey, Switzerland, Indonesia, Sweden, Nicaragua, the Russian Federation, Chile, Peru, Albania, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Canada, Bangladesh, Costa Rica, Australia, South Africa and Pakistan.
At its 1st meeting, on 18 April, the Working Group heard statements by the representatives of the following countries: Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Denmark, France, Hungary(on behalf of the European Union), Japan, Pakistan, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States.
Under item 2 of the agenda, the Working Group heard statements from the following States: Angola, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Canada, China, Colombia, Croatia, Egypt, France, Greece, Japan, Indonesia, Iran(Islamic Republic of), Ireland, Namibia, Netherlands, Norway, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Russian Federation, Spain, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, United Kingdom and United States.
Under item 3 of the agenda, the Working Group heard statements from the representatives of the following States: Algeria, Argentina, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Canada, Cuba, China, Colombia, Croatia, Czech Republic, Egypt, France, Greece, Japan, Indonesia, Iran(Islamic Republic of), Mexico, Namibia, Netherlands, Norway, Pakistan, Philippines, Russian Federation, Spain, Turkey, United States and Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of.
At its 5th meeting,on 15 May, the Working Group heard introductory statements by the Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs and the representative of the Secretary-General regarding the status of implementation of the above-mentioned recommendations.
The Working Group heard various statements in support of preparing an international convention dealing with issues of electronic contracting, which was said to be best suited to ensure the degree of uniformity and legal certainty required by international trade transactions.
At its 1st meeting, on 12 September 1994, the working group heard a statement by the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
Under agenda item 3, the Working Group heard a statement by the Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children.
In the course of its work, the Working Group heard a statement from, and had an exchange of views with, the representative of the Office of the United Nations Security Coordinator.
The Working Group heard a statement by the Legal Counsel on the matter and noted that the Secretariat would make every effort to finalize the report well ahead of the next session of the General Assembly.
At its 1st substantive meeting, on 23 January 1997,also chaired by the President of the General Assembly, the Working Group heard the latter's statement.
The Working Group heard a statement made on behalf of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises on the significant effect on human rights of rules governing global business, especially private investment agreements between investors and host States.
The Working Group heard a statement from the representative of Australia on the report entitled"Legal aspects of NEO threat response and related institutional issues", prepared by the University of Nebraska-Lincoln(United States), in which key legal and institutional issues linked to potential future threats posed by NEOs were examined.
The Working Group heard the statement by a representative of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime(UNODC) regarding the relevance of the work by this Working Group to the work of UNODC and intergovernmental mechanisms established under the United Nations Convention against Corruption on the issues of prevention of corruption in public procurement.