Приклади вживання Lead supervisory authority Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The supervisory authority which informed the lead supervisory authority may submit a draft for a decision.
Where the lead supervisory authority decides to handle the case, the procedure provided in Article 60 shall apply.
CHAPTER VII Cooperation andconsistency Section 1 Cooperation Article 60 Cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned 1.
In the case where the lead supervisory authority decides to handle the case, paragraph 3 of Article 60 shall apply.
In the cases referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article,the supervisory authority shall inform the lead supervisory authority without delay on that matter.
The lead supervisory authority shall take utmost account of that draft when preparing the draft decision referred to in Article 60(3).
If you are a resident of the European Economic Area(EEA) and believe we maintain your personal data subject tothe General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR), you may direct questions or complaints to your local supervisory authority or our lead supervisory authority, the UK's Information commissioner's Office.
The lead supervisory authority and the supervisory authorities concerned shall exchange all relevant information with each other.
Where any of the other supervisory authorities concerned within a period of four weeks after having been consulted in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article,expresses a relevant and reasoned objection to the draft decision, the lead supervisory authority shall, if it does not follow the relevant and reasoned objection or is of the opinion it is not relevant and reasoned, submit the matter to the consistency mechanism referred to in Article 63.
The lead supervisory authority shall, without delay, communicate the relevant information on the matter to the other supervisory authorities concerned.
The supervisory authority which informed the lead supervisory authority may submit to the lead supervisory authority a draft for a decision.
The lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned shall supply the information required under this Article to each other by electronic means, using a standardised format.
(130) Where the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodgedis not the lead supervisory authority, the lead supervisory authority should closely co-operate with the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged according to the provisions on co-operation and consistency laid down in this Regulation.
Where the lead supervisory authority decides not to handle the case, the supervisory authority which informed the lead supervisory authority shall handle it according to Articles 61 and62.
Where none of the other supervisory authorities concerned has objected to the draft decision submitted by the lead supervisory authority within the period referred toin paragraphs 4 and 5, the lead supervisory authority and the supervisory authorities concerned shall be deemed to be in agreement with that draft decision and shall be bound by it.
The lead supervisory authority or, as the case may be, the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged shall adopt its final decision on the basis of the decision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, without undue delay and at the latest by one month after the Board has notified its decision.
In other cases of cross-border relevance, the cooperation mechanism between the lead supervisory authority and supervisory authorities concerned should be applied and mutual assistance and joint operations might be carried out between the supervisory authorities concerned on a bilateral or multilateral basis without triggering the consistency mechanism.
The lead supervisory authority may request at any time other supervisory authorities concerned to provide mutual assistance pursuant to Article 61 and may conduct joint operations pursuant to Article 62, in particular for carrying out investigations or for monitoring the implementation of a measure concerning a controller or processor established in another Member State.
In other cases of cross-border relevance, the cooperation mechanism between the lead supervisory authority and supervisory authorities concerned should be applied and mutual assistance and joint operations might be carried out between the supervisory authorities concerned on a bilateral or multilateral basis without triggering the consistency mechanism.
Where the lead supervisory authority intends to follow the relevant and reasoned objection made, it shall submit to the other supervisory authorities concerned a revised draft decision for their opinion.
When deciding whether it will handle the case, the lead supervisory authority should take into account, whether there is an establishment of the controller or processor in the Member State of the supervisory authority which informed it in order to ensure effective enforcement of a decision vis-à-vis the controller or processor.
Where the lead supervisory authority decides to handle the case, the supervisory authority which informed it should have the possibility to submit a draft for a decision, of which the lead supervisory authority should take utmost account when preparing its draft decision in that one‑stop‑shop mechanism.
(128) The rules on the lead supervisory authority and the one-stop-shop mechanism should not apply where the processing is carried out by public authorities or private bodies in the public interest.
The rules on the lead supervisory authority and the one-stop-shop mechanism should not apply where the processing is carried out by public authorities or private bodies in the public interest.
Where the lead supervisory authority decides to handle the case, the supervisory authority which informed it should have the possibility to submit a draft for a decision, of which the lead supervisory authority should take utmost account when preparing its draft decision in that one-stop-shop mechanism.
After being informed, the lead supervisory authority should decide, whether it will handle the case pursuant to the provision on cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and other supervisory authorities concerned(one-stop-shop mechanism), or whether the supervisory authority which informed it should handle the case at local level.
In such cases, the lead supervisory authority should, when taking measures intended to produce legal effects, including the imposition of administrative fines, take utmost account of the view of the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged and which should remain competent to carry out any investigation on the territory of its own Member State in liaison with the competent supervisory authority. .
In such cases, the lead supervisory authority should, when taking measures intended to produce legal effects, including the imposition of administrative fines, take utmost account of the view of the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged and which should remain competent to carry out any investigation on the territory of its own Member State in liaison with the competent supervisory authority. .