Приклади вживання More massive stars Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
That's not the case for far more massive stars.
More massive stars die by photodisintegration.
Old, low mass stars should makemuch fainter planetary nebulae than young, more massive stars.
More massive stars will evolve even more quickly.
Core-collapse is thought to occur when the more massive stars in a globular cluster encounter their less massive companions.
More massive stars evolve into Wolf- Rayet stars before exploding as a type Ib or Ic supernova.
Prof Zijlstra adds:“Old, low mass stars should makemuch fainter planetary nebulae than young, more massive stars.
More massive stars, such as those with masses of over 20 times our Sun's mass, may eventually create a black hole.
Our sun has probably got enough fuel to last another five billion years orso, but more massive stars can use up their fuel in as little as one hundred million years, much less than the age of the universe.
Still more massive stars(up to two solar masses) abruptly move off the main sequence into the region of the red super-giants.
Our sun has probablygot enough fuel to last another five billion years or so, but more massive stars can use up their fuel in as little as one hundred million years, much less than the age of the universe.
More massive stars cool down more rapidly and will reach the temperature at which crystallisation happens in about one billion years.
Our sun has probably got enough fuel to last another five billion years orso, but more massive stars can use up their fuel in as little as one hundred million years, much less than the age of the universe.
More massive stars would need to be hotter to balance their stronger gravitational attraction, making the nuclear fusion reactions proceed so much more rapidly that they would use up their hydrogen in as little as a hundred million years.
Different theories exist as to how these massive stars form but the team's findings lend weight to the idea that the entire cloud core begins to collapse inwards,with material raining in towards the centre to form one or more massive stars.
In most cases, we think of more massive stars as burning hotter(and hence, burning through their fuel faster), and this is true.
More massive stars would need to be hotter to balance their stronger gravitational attraction, making the nuclear fusion reactions proceed so much more rapidly that they would use up their hydrogen in as little as a hundred million years.
So now you have hydrogen fusion, we saw this happen around 10 million Kelvin and I want to make itvery clear, since we are talking about more massive stars, even at this stage, there is going to be more gravitational pressure, even at this stage, during the main sequence of the star because it is more massive, so this is going to burn faster and hotter.
In more massive stars, helium atoms can merge with the formation of heavier elements, but the absence of neutrino-matter interaction makes it impossible to form supernovae-the star simply contracts, preventing the spread of heavy atoms in space.
Since the brightest gamma-ray bursts produce more massive stars, usually located in the areas of space, which contains more matter, every time astronomers metaphorically considered each such surge like an injection needle into something bigger.
An even more massive star continues to collapse and becomes a black hole.
A more massive star explodes as a type Ic supernova after losing its helium layer due to the so-called stellar winds.
When two stars collide they likely either combine to form one more massive star, or they stick, forming a new binary star system.
As a result, born stars that are more massive than modern stars.