Приклади вживання Territorial acquisitions Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Whatwere territorial acquisitions in Poland under this agreement?
Soviet sphere of influence and territorial acquisitions are in orange.
About territorial acquisitions of Vladimir striking tangible vidsunennya Kievan state borders in the west.
During the 19th century, more territorial acquisitions were made w Europe and Asia.
No territorial acquisitions or special advantages obtained either by force or by other means of coercion shall be recognized.".
During the 19thcentury, more territorial acquisitions were made in Europe and Asia.
No territorial acquisitions or special advantages obtained either by force or by other means of coercion shall be recognized.
Accordingly, modern Chinese historians ascribe China's territorial acquisitions to conquests by non-Han states(for example Mongolia and Manchuria).
Manifest Destiny was a phrase that expressed the belief that the United States was destined to expand from the Atlantic seaboard to the Pacific Ocean;it has also been used to advocate for or justify other territorial acquisitions.
Is Russia has made any territorial acquisitions in the early twentieth century.?
Every state, even the most democratic, and especially now, in the age of imperialism, not only will never agree to allow the oppressed nations to separate,but will always strive to make new territorial acquisitions, to oppress even more nations.
Moreover, if Moscow stops at these territorial acquisitions and does not go further to the West, but the Anschluss of the spring of 2014 will most likely get away with it.
The complicity of the two EU member states in the division of Moldova and Ukraine, even with the formal consent of the authorities of both states partially occupied by Russia, will allow Moscow to turn Bucharest and Warsaw into accomplices and its international lawyers,which at least partially legitimizes Russian territorial acquisitions.
With this in mind, the RF's new“territorial acquisitions” would become a continuous zone of conflict, which would not allow them to be effectively used to ensure communication with the Crimea.
Merriam Webster defines“imperialism” as:“the policy, practice, or advocacy of extending the power anddominion of a nation especially by direct territorial acquisitions or by gaining indirect control over the political or economic life of other areas; broadly: the extension or imposition of power, authority, or influence.”.
In addition to mentioning the theory'sfailure to account for Japan's 20th century territorial acquisitions, NATO's continuation or Germany's non-achievement of regional hegemony in the post-Cold war era,[1][62] they have also expressed serious doubts regarding offensive neorealism views on China's rising power and U.S. regional hegemony.
Territorial acquisition at the expense of neighbors generated in last retribution mood;
Territorial acquisition by Sviatoslav short time has been lost.
MontenegroSerbia, Romania obtained full independenceing and territorial acquisition.
No territorial acquisition resulting from the threat or use of force shall be recognized as legal…”.
No territorial acquisition or special advantage resulting from aggression is or shall be recognized as lawful.
At first territorial acquisition formed the additional burden on the Ukrainian economy, because after the deportation of the Crimean Tatar people of the peninsula farm stayvalo not in the best condition.
From the second half of the 18th century onwards,international law has come to distinguish between the occupation of a country and territorial acquisition by invasion and annexation, the difference between the two being originally expounded upon by Emerich de Vattel in The Law of Nations(1758).
For Germany it was the last territorial acquisition before World War II; for Lithuania it was a major downturn in its economy and morale; for Europe it was a further escalation in pre-war tensions.
Even to ask the question, one risks the appearance of supporting a repressive dictatorship, and to the extent that the question is entertained at all, the simplistic answer proffered by political leaders is that Saddam Hussein is an aggressive tyrant,bent on territorial acquisition and the subjugation of other nations.
Then he declared that this was his last territorial acquisition in Europe.
And Britain is not seeking territorial orother acquisitions.
For Germany, consequently, the only possibility for carrying out a healthy territorial policy lay in the acquisition of new land in Europe itself.