Примери за използване на Applicant's right на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
In particular, the applicant's right to leave the country did not depend on whether or not she remained a Bulgarian national.
In that regard, the fact that several extensions have been granted in the absence of adversarial argument does not breach the applicant's right to fair legal process if the position of the parties has not been substantially changed.
The applicant's right to receive compensation from the person liable for the damage caused by the criminal offence is uncertain, or.
It follows that has been a violation of the applicant's right to leave any country, as guaranteed by Article 2§ 2 of Protocol No. 4.
The issue of who is in possession of the documents is, however, disputed by the parties and must be resolved in order todeal with the plea alleging infringement of the applicant's right of access laid down in Decision 93/731.
Alleged violation of the applicant's right to be brought before a judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power(Article 5§ 3 of the Convention).
Having regard to all the relevant facts and, in particular, the lack of clarity in domestic law and practice as to the effect of the seven-day time-limit,the Court finds that the exercise of the applicant's right under Article 5§ 4 of the Convention has been unduly impaired.
An official document issued by an accredited body certifying the applicant's right to pursue their studies at higher education institutions in the country where secondary education was obtained.
It is for that reason that, contrary to the Parliament's argument, the abovementioned case-law does not apply to the present case andcannot therefore be cited as a relevant authority to deny the applicant's right to rely on the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.
It follows that there has been a violation of the applicant's right to be brought before a judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power within the meaning of Article 5§ 3 of the Convention.
A legalized document with a certified translation in Bulgarian, issued by a competent authority(a secondary school in which the secondaryeducation has been completed) to verify the applicant's right to continue his/ her education in all degrees of higher education in the country of secondary education acquisition.
That restriction is, however, justified in the light of an applicant's right to effective protection, given that, in the absence of such proceedings, that right would be meaningless(see Hypoteční banka, paragraph 53).
According to the EEAS, the General Court erred in law in holding, in paragraph 65 of its judgment, that the EEAS had not properly complied with the judgment of 16 December 2015, De Loecker v EEAS(F-34/15)and infringed the applicant's right to be heard in not hearing him in the context of the analysis prior to the opening of an administrative investigation.
In order to determine whether the applicant's right not to incriminate himself has been violated, the Court will have regard, in turn, to the following factors: the nature and degree of compulsion used to obtain the evidence;
First, from the start of the investigation procedure, the Commission treated Schneider unfairly, then, after the incompatibility decision,infringed the applicant's right to be heard by an impartial authority, and seriously misconstrued the exclusive investigatory authority which the regulation reserves to the institution.
Consequently, the Council had not infringed the applicant's right of access to documents conferred by Regulation No 1049/2001 by refusing to provide it with information on the contents of the discussions relating to the first item on the agenda of the meeting of 19 December 2003, since that information did not exist in the form of a document that could be disseminated.
For applicants for undergraduate programmes or a preparatory course- a document issued by a competent body,which certifies the applicant's right to continue their education in the higher education institutions in the country where the applicant obtained their secondary education.
The judicial authorities shall, in respect of the measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, have the authority to require the applicant to provide any reasonably available evidence in order tosatisfy themselves with a sufficient degree of certainty that the applicant is the rightholder and that the applicant's right is being infringed, or that such infringement is imminent.
That restriction is, however, justified in the light of an applicant's right to effective protection, given that, in the absence of such proceedings, that right would be meaningless.'.
The list of necessary documents, depending on the basis on which the land plot is allocated, is contained in the Order of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation of January 12,2015 N"On approving the list of documents confirming the applicant's right to purchase a land plot without bidding", as well as in federal and regional laws.
The first ground of appeal alleges an error of law in that the General Court disregarded the applicant's right, enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, to be heard prior to the adoption of new restrictive measures.
Accepting the applicant's right(as the Court did in its judgment) implies accepting the premiss that an EU national who goes to another Member State is entitled to assume‘that, wherever he goes to earn his living in the EU, he will be treated in accordance with a common code of fundamental values… In other words, he is entitled to say“civis europeus sum” and to invoke that status in order to oppose any violation of his fundamental freedoms'.
The first ground of appeal,alleging an error of law in that the General Court disregarded the applicant's right to be heard prior to the adoption of new restrictive measures, as enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights; .
Lastly, it must be held that the fact that the Member State responsible does not communicate to the Member State carrying out the transfer information concerning its legislation relating to safe third countries andits relevant administrative practice does not impair the applicant's right to an effective remedy against the transfer decision and against the decision on the application for international protection.
In sum, the Court considers that the above legal regime andits application in the present case infringed the applicant's right to an effective remedy against the degrading treatment to which he was subjected and the interference with his freedom of expression.
The first ground of appeal,alleging an error of law in that the General Court disregarded the applicant's right to be heard prior to the adoption of new restrictive measures, as enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights; .
A document issued by a competent authority(a secondary school where the secondary education has been acquired)certifying the applicant's right to continue his/ her education at all levels of higher education institutions within the country(insert the name of the country) where the secondary education has been acquired.
The first ground of appeal,alleging an error of law in that the General Court disregarded the applicant's right to be heard prior to the adoption of new restrictive measures, as enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights; .
A document issued by a competent body(the secondary school in which the secondary education has been acquired)certifying the applicant's right to continue his/ her education in all degrees in the Institutions of Higher Education(Universities) at the country(displays the name of the country) that he/she has completed his/her secondary education.
The court shall have the power to required the applicants to provide evidence in order to satisfy it with a sufficient degree orcertainty that the applicants is the right holder and that the applicant's right is being infringed or that such infringement is imminent, and to order the applicant to provide a security or equivalent assurance sufficient to protect the defendant and to prevent abuse.