Примери за използване на Brussels convention на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
March 2002 and replaces the Brussels Convention of 1968.
The Brussels Convention Relating to the Distribution of Programme Carrying Signals Transmitted by Satellite(1974).
That article reproduced, in essence, the terms of Article 5 of the Brussels Convention and provided.
Jenard(25) on the Brussels Convention, being known to national legal systems too.
The same need for continuity applies as regards the interpretation of the Brussels Convention by the Court…'.
The first paragraph of Article 3 of the Brussels Convention, which appears in the same section, provides as follows.
Paragraph 22, which, it is true, infers the solution from the express terms of Article 16 of the Brussels Convention.
Under the Brussels Convention, appeal proceedings against the declaration of enforceability were regulated in Article 36.
The Court had the opportunity to examine this issue in the well-known case Gruber concerning the Brussels Convention.
Brussels Convention Relating to the Distribution of Program-Carrying Signals Transmitted by Satellite(The Satellites Convention) 1974.
Consequently, account is to be taken of interpretation already provided by the Court in the context of the Brussels Convention.
Brussels Convention of 17 December 1971 relating to Civil Liability in the Field of Maritime Carriage of Nuclear Material.
Certain provisions of the Protocol annexed to the Brussels Convention should accordingly be incorporated in this Regulation.
Brussels Convention of 17 December 1971 relating to Civil Liability in the Field of Maritime Carriage of Nuclear Material.
The scope of Regulation No 44/2001 is, like that of the Brussels Convention, limited to‘civil and commercial matters'.
The Brussels Convention' and this Regulation should be ensured, and transitional provisions should be laid down to that end.
Interpretation of the term‘civil and commercial matters', for the purposes of the Brussels Convention and of Regulation No 44/2001.
The material scope of the Brussels Convention, defined in Article 1, is limited to civil and commercial matters.
What findings can be inferred from the case-law on the interpretation of Article 5(3) of the Brussels Convention and of the Brussels I Regulation?
Concerning, the necessity to interpret the Brussels Convention independently, see judgment of 15 January 2004, Blijdenstein(C‑433/01, EU: C: 2004:21, paragraph 24 and the case-law cited).
This seems to me to be necessary, first of all, in the light of the wording ofArticle 27 of Regulation No 44/2001, which reproduces that of Article 21 of the Brussels Convention.
Sweden is a party to the Brussels Regulation, Brussels Convention and Lugano Conventions. .
The first paragraph of Article 1 of the Brussels Convention, which was replaced by Regulation No 44/2001, provided that that Convention applied in civil and commercial matters whatever the nature of the court or tribunal.
The same need for continuity applies as regards the interpretation of the Brussels Convention by the Court of Justice of the European Communities…'.
Whereas the Brussels Convention and Regulation No 44/2001 reaffirm the principle of judicial cooperation, and the onus is on the Commission to act on the progress made in the Green Paper, which proposes possible lines of action on the question of extra-territoriality, particularly in terms of expanding the scope of the regulation to include disputes involving respondents from third countries.
In that connection, it must be stated that the scope of Regulation No 44/2001 is, like the Brussels Convention, limited to‘civil and commercial matters'.
Article 16(1) of Regulation No 44/2001, unlike the Brussels Convention, thus does not only determine the international jurisdiction, but also the internal jurisdiction, with the aim of offering broader protection to consumers.
(c) revising the jurisdiction clause in Article 8(16)in the light of any provision which may have been inserted in the 1968 Brussels Convention or in any text adopted by Member States or by the Council to replace such Convention; .
In so far as this Regulation replaces the provisions of the Brussels Convention between Member States, any reference to the Convention shall be understood as a reference to this Regulation.
I have already set out the reasons why the case-law relating to the corresponding provisions of the Brussels Convention and the Rome Convention is relevant for the purposes of the interpretation of that provision.