Примери за използване на Commission disputes на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Commission disputes those claims.
The Slovak Republic, supported by several Member States, and the Commission disputes the referring court's assessment.
The Commission disputes those arguments.
Supported by the Commission, disputes those arguments.
The Commission disputes those arguments and contends in particular that the aid in question was at no time approved by the Community or Polish authorities on the basis of Article 8(4) of Protocol No 2.
In the present case, the Commission disputes that the main action is admissible.
The Commission disputes that line of argument.
But the investigative commission disputes that figure, saying it conflicts with earlier data.
The Commission disputes, in essence, the applicant's standing to challenge Articles 1 and 2 of the contested decision on the basis of the third situation provided for in the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU.
In each of those possible situations, the Commission disputes the reasoning given in the judgment under appeal as regards the nature of the time limit set for that institution for the adoption of a decision on financial corrections.
The Commission disputes the applicants' line of argument.
The Commission disputes the applicant's arguments.
The Commission disputes the correctness of those arguments.
The Commission disputes the soundness of that plea in law.
The Commission disputes the various arguments set out at paragraphs 267 to 274 above.
Last, the Commission disputes certain factual assertions in Hoechst's observations.
The Commission disputes other claimed errors on which the Court has based its assessment.
Second, the Commission disputes Microsoft's assertion that because of the contested decision its competitors will no longer have any incentive to create their own technology.
Last, the Commission disputes Microsoft's argument that the integration of media functionality in Windows client PC operating systems forms part of a natural evolution.
While the Commission disputes that assessment of the president's powers, the fact that other members of his College are already making plans for life after Juncker is plain to see.
While the Commission disputes that assessment of the president's powers, the fact that other members of his College are already making plans for life after Juncker is plain to see.
Last, the Commission disputes Microsoft's assertion that it has not been shown that media functionality is not linked, by its nature or according to commercial usage, to client PC operating systems.
The Commission disputes the applicant's arguments and contends, without formally raising an objection of inadmissibility within the meaning of Article 130(1) of the Rules of Procedure, that the action is inadmissible.
The Commission disputes the applicants' arguments and contends, inter alia, albeit without having formally raised an objection of inadmissibility under Article 130(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, that their action is inadmissible.
The Commission disputes the admissibility of the argument put forward by Deutsche Bahn concerning the error in law made by the General Court in allowing fortuitous discoveries on the ground that it pertains to findings of fact which may not be reviewed on appeal.
In the second place, the Commission disputes the reasoning in paragraphs 199 and 200 of the judgment under appeal, which the General Court relied on when it found, in paragraph 209 of that judgment, that the Commission was required to disclose to UPS the final version of the model before adopting the decision at issue.
The Commission disputes Microsoft's assertion that it ought, rather, to have considered whether there was a demand for the tying product without the tied product, which in the Commission's submission amounts to an incorrect claim that complementary products cannot constitute two separate products for the purposes of Article 82 EC.
RTVE, the and the Commission dispute the admissibility of such an argument.
RTVE, the and the Commission dispute those arguments.
In this connection, the United Kingdom, French and Estonian Governments,the Council and Commission dispute that Decision 2014/512 contains restrictive measures against natural or legal persons, since, in their view, the measures which it contains apply to situations that are determined objectively and a category of persons that is defined generally.