Примери за използване на Comparator arm на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Comparator arms*.
There were no confirmed responses in the comparator arm.
Patients on the comparator arm received cisplatin(P) 100 mg/m2 followed by 5-fluorouracil(F).
The median number of treatment cycles was 19 for the Empliciti arm and 14 for the comparator arm.
Study PRO-806 included an open-label comparator arm with sublingual buprenorphine(12 to 16 mg/day).
At 48 weeks these rates were 25.2% of patients in the APTIVUS/ ritonavir arm and 15.6% in the comparator arm.
Patients on the comparator arm received cisplatin(P) 100 mg/m2 followed by 5-fluorouracil(F) 1000 mg/m2 per day for 5 days.
Overall, 29(5.5%) of patients in the MYLOTARG arm and 15(2.8%) patients in the comparator arm died during remission.
Despite the use of an open-label comparator arm, this endpoint is considered robust, as it is based on urine toxicology.
There is limited data in patients previously treated with rituximab(38 patients in the Pixuvri arm and 39 patients in the comparator arm). .
Table 6 Summary of ADRs reported with a higher incidence(difference of≥2% versus the comparator arm) in patients receiving Gazyvaro+ chemotherapy* System organ class.
This study randomised 140 patients(1:1) to treatment with either Pixuvri orto an investigator chosen single-agent chemotherapy on the comparator arm.
Patients in the comparator arm received ipilimumab 3 mg/kg and nivolumab-matched placebo intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses followed by placebo every 2 weeks.
In the TNBC patient subgroup the confirmed ORR was 48%(41/86)in the olaparib arm and 12%(4/33) in the comparator arm.
In the comparator arm, subjects received initial heparin therapy concurrently with warfarin, titrated to a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0, followed by warfarin alone.
A total of 405 PFS events were observed; 245 events(55.2%)in the palbociclib plus letrozole arm and 160(72.1%) in the comparator arm respectively.
Adverse reactions for haematological disorders are provided compared to the comparator arm, as the comparator has a significant effect on these disorders(Table 4).
Grade 3 or4 elevations of triglycerides occurred more frequently in the APTIVUS/ ritonavir arm compared with the comparator arm. .
The median time to response was 43 days in the MIRCERA arm and 29 days in the comparator arm, with increases of haemoglobin within the first 6 weeks of 0.2 g/ dl/ week and 0.3 g/ dl/ week, respectively.
The efficacy of Durogesic has been shown in six studies in adults with non-malignant pain, of which five were open-label and3 did not have a comparator arm.
Patients on the comparator arm received cisplatin(P) 100 mg/m² as a 30-minute to three-hour intravenous infusion on day 1 followed by the continuous intravenous infusion of 5-fluorouracil(F) 1000 mg/m²/day from day 1 to day 5.
In Cycle 1,the overall incidence of IRRs was higher in patients receiving Gazyvaro plus chemotherapy compared to patients in the comparator arm.
Patients on the comparator arm received cisplatin(P) 100 mg/m² as a 30-minute to three-hour intravenous infusion on day 1 followed by the continuous intravenous infusion of 5-fluorouracil(F) 1000 mg/m²/day from day 1 to day 5.
Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was observed to a lesser extent in the Rd and Rd18 arms than in the comparator arm(8.1% vs 11.1%, respectively).
After Week 8, patients in the comparator arm who met the protocol defined criteria of initial lack of virologic response had the option of discontinuing treatment and switching over to APTIVUS/ ritonavir in a separate roll-over study.
In Phase III RESIST trials, the frequency of transaminase elevations was significantly increased in the APTIVUS/ ritonavir arm compared to the comparator arm.
In the comparator arm patients received 1% hydrocortisone acetate ointment(HA) for head and neck and 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate ointment for trunk and limbs(n=111) twice a day for 2 weeks and subsequently HA twice a day to all affected areas.
The tenofovir disoproxil fumaratearm also had significantly smaller mean increases in fasting triglycerides and total cholesterol than the comparator arm. .
In the olaparib arm 8% with measurable disease had a complete response versus 1.5% of patients in the comparator arm; 74/167(44%) of patients in the olaparib arm had a partial response versus 14/66(21%) of patients in the chemotherapy arm. .
After 48 weeks of follow-up, the frequency of Grade 3 or 4 ALAT and/ orASAT abnormalities was higher in APTIVUS/ ritonavir patients compared with comparator arm patients(10% and 3.4%, respectively).