Примери за използване на Execution of a european arrest warrant на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Execution of a European Arrest Warrant.
The Regional Court in Bourgas had a session on the execution of a European Arrest Warrant against Owen W.
The execution of a European arrest warrant may be refused.
Expenses incurred in the territory of the executing MemberState for the execution of a European arrest warrant shall be borne by that Member State.
I consider therefore that a risk of breach of the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter is capable of giving rise to an obligation to postpone the execution of a European arrest warrant.
Proceedings concerning the execution of a European arrest warrant issued against Szymon Kozłowski.
The Directive lays down rules concerning the right to interpretation andtranslation in criminal proceedings and proceedings for the execution of a European arrest warrant.
(9) The role of central authorities in the execution of a European arrest warrant must be limited to practical and administrative assistance.'.
The Directive lays down minimum rules concerning the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in proceedings for the execution of a European arrest warrant.
The role of central authorities in the execution of a European arrest warrant must be limited to practical and administrative assistance.
The risk of breach of the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter in the issuing Member State is therefore capable of preventing the execution of a European arrest warrant.
The executing judicial authority may make the execution of a European arrest warrant subject solely to the conditions set out in Article 5 of that framework decision.
However, this cannot, to my mind,be taken to mean that a risk of breach of Article 47 of the Charter cannot result in the execution of a European arrest warrant being postponed.
Furthermore, the executing judicial authority may make the execution of a European arrest warrant subject solely to the conditions set out in Article 5 of that framework decision(Radu, paragraphs 35 and 36).
On the other hand, the finding that there is just a real risk of breach of the prohibition of inhuman ordegrading treatment obliges the executing judicial authority to postpone the execution of a European arrest warrant.
This would be the case wherethe lawyer in the executing Member State cannot fulfil his or her tasks as regards the execution of a European arrest warrant effectively and efficiently without the assistance of a lawyer in the issuing Member State.
I take the view that, in order for the execution of a European arrest warrant to have to be postponed, it is not sufficient that there is a real risk of breach of the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter in the issuing Member State.
REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Supreme Court(Ireland), made by decision of 31 July 2018, received at the Court on 6 August 2018,in proceedings relating to the execution of a European arrest warrant issued in respect of. .
The objective pursued in Article 4(6) of the Framework Decision cannot justify an absolute bar to execution of a European arrest warrant concerning a national of the executing State where that national opposes his surrender.
The execution of a European arrest warrant must be deferred if there is a real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment because of the conditions of detention of the person concerned in the Member State where the warrant was issued.
The request has been made in proceedings between Mr Melloni andthe Ministerio Fiscal concerning the execution of a European arrest warrant issued by the Italian authorities for the execution of a prison sentence handed down by judgment in absentia against Mr Melloni.
As part of the execution of a European arrest warrant issued by your country of origin(cases 2 and 3), the urgent applications judge carries out an initial verification and review within 15 days of the arrest by the Judges' Council Chamber.
I propose that the test applied by the European Court of Human Rights be adopted and that it be held that the execution of a European arrest warrant must be postponed only if there is a real risk of flagrant denial of justice in the issuing Member State.
The Minister for Justice and Equality(Ireland)(‘the Minister'), the Netherlands Government, the Polish Government(28) andthe Commission consider that a risk of breach of the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter is capable of giving rise to an obligation to postpone the execution of a European arrest warrant.
Accordingly, to hold that, as long as the Council has not adopted a decision on the basis of Article 7(1) TEU, the executing judicial authority cannot determine whether there is a real risk of breach of a fundamental right in the issuing Member State would be tantamount to prohibiting that authority, for a period that is at the very least indeterminate,from postponing the execution of a European arrest warrant.
Accordingly, it seems to me that the executing judicial authority can be required to postpone the execution of a European arrest warrant only if there is a real risk of breach not of the right to a fair trial but of the essence of that right.
The Chief Prosecutor added that a procedure on the execution of a European arrest warrant before a German court is fortcoming, after that the person will be brought to Bulgaria, where the indictment will be initiated, simultaneously all the necessary investigative actions would be underway, and not a single scenario would be ruled out.
Consequently, the answer to the first question should be that Article 1(3)of the Framework Decision must be interpreted as requiring the executing judicial authority to postpone the execution of a European arrest warrant where it finds not only that there is a real risk of flagrant denial of justice on account of the deficiencies in the system of justice of the issuing Member State but also that the person who is the subject of that warrant is exposed to such a risk.
Such an interpretation would, in particular, allow a Member State to make the execution of a European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of executing a sentence rendered in absentia subject to conditions intended to avoid an interpretation which restricts or adversely affects fundamental rights recognised by its constitution, even though the application of such conditions is not allowed under Article 4a(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584.