Примери за използване на Framers на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
These are the framers of the Constitution, Homer!
The only remaining question is whether the members of the Senate will accept andcarry out the responsibility placed on them by the Framers of our Constitution and their constitutional Oaths.”.
Because, if what the framers of our constitution mean.
The Framers prescribed a clear remedy for presidents who violate their oath of office.
I will pass that off to the framers of the Constitution.
The framers of the Constitution prescribed a clear remedy for presidents who so violate their oath of office.
Our Constitution does not envisage political parties as part of the mechanism of government, and its framers seem not to have pictured to themselves the existence in our national politics….
Or, as the framers of the constitution put it, the ability to have"life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness".
To my mind, that question must be answered in the affirmative, in order toafford a sufficient degree of certainty and legal certainty to the classification of the acts of the Union that was established by the framers of the Treaty.
The framers of these articles, therefore, have imputed this opinion to me, not only without truth, but without a sufficient sanction from their own discretion.
Two great powers who regard themselves as the founders andleaders of civilization and the framers of constitutions have risen up against the followers of the Faith associated with Him Who conversed with God.
If the framers of the Treaties had intended to limit the European Union's external competence and amend 40-year old case-law, the Commission assumes that they would have made that intention clear.
Our Constitution does not envisage political parties as part of the mechanism of government, and its framers seem not to have pictured to themselves the existence in our national politics of anything like the modern political machine.
The framers of the Constitution of the United States, which has become a model for constitutional governments everywhere, include Article 1, Section 8, which refers to promoting the progress of science and useful arts.
As the Court says, the State's decision was“without doubt a proper exercise of its sovereign authority within our federal system,all in the way that the Framers of the Constitution intended.”.
It follows from those provisions that the framers of the Treaty took a purely formal approach,(29) according to which legislative acts are to be classified as such if they are adopted according to the ordinary legislative procedure or according to a special legislative procedure.
She concluded that the final part of Article 3(2) TFEU codifies the ERTA case-law andfound no evidence to support the Council's argument that the framers of the Lisbon Treaty had intended otherwise.
Though, of course,you do have the right to use your arms in such a fashion, the framers of the American constitution actually intended for the American citizenry to carry a bigger stick, metaphorically speaking, than their own government does.
Thus, the‘dignity' was conferred by the state's own choice, a choice that was‘without doubt a proper exercise of its sovereign authority within our federal system,all in the way that the Framers of the Constitution intended.'”.
The incompleteness, indeed, according to some,the evident inconsistency of the classification made by the framers of the Treaty must thus be seen as the consequence of their intention to afford certain acts the status of legislative act and to deny that status to other acts.
And, on the contrary, if it be"possible for believers finally to fall away from faith andsalvation," it follows that"faith is not peculiar to the elect," they being the individuals concerning whom the framers of these articles assert, that it is impossible for them not to be saved.
Few, if any, I venture to assert,among these privileged framers and custodians of the constitution of the Faith of Bahá'u'lláh are even dimly aware of the preponderating rôle which the North American continent is destined to play in the future orientation of their world-embracing Cause.
That the unrest and suffering afflicting the mass of mankind are in no small measure the direct consequences of the World War andare attributable to the unwisdom and short-sightedness of the Framers of the Peace Treaties only a biased mind can refuse to admit….
Reflecting the varied social backgrounds andpolitical philosophies of its framers, the constitution of 1917 includes various contradictory provisions, endorsing within the same text socialism, capitalism, liberal democracy, authoritarian corporatism, and a host of unimplemented provisions for specific social reforms.
Admittedly, it is possible to take the view that a distinction between legislative acts and non-legislative acts arising from such‘legal nominalism'(31)will raise problems of consistency(32) and that the framers of the Treaty did not complete the task of classifying the legislative act of the Union.
Neither the force which the framers and guarantors of the Peace Treaties have mustered, nor the lofty ideals which originally animated the author of the Covenant of the League of Nations, have proved a sufficient bulwark against the forces of internal disruption with which a structure so laboriously contrived had been consistently assailed.
It is equally possible to consider- and this is my preferred solution- that, on the other hand,by opting for an exclusively formal approach to the legislative act, the framers of the Treaty made it possible to identify with certainty the legal bases that authorise the institutions of the Union to adopt legislative acts.
I think there's also an amazing arrogance to the idea that he knows better than the framers of the Constitution in how the government should be designed and work for separation of powers and the fact that the executive and the legislative branch have to work together and they have checks and balances on each other, and then the judicial branch, which oversees the entire process.
Some historians have suggested a revised definition of the"Founding Fathers",including a significantly broader group of not only the Signers and the Framers but also all those who, whether as politicians or jurists or statesmen or soldiers or diplomats or ordinary citizens, took part in winning US independence and creating the United States of America.
The"Founding Fathers" as defined by the above to mean a very large group of Patriots including not only the Signers and the Framers but also those who participated in the creation of the United States of American in their roles of politicians, statesmen, soldiers, diplomats and ordinary citizens.