Примери за използване на General monitoring на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
General Monitoring of Internet.
The procedure is same as general monitoring.
General monitoring of posology.
(a) The prohibition of a general monitoring obligation.
No general monitoring obligation for online platforms, nor compulsory use of filters.
The application of this Article shall not lead to any general monitoring obligation.
There is no general monitoring obligation”.
These duties of care should not amount to a general monitoring obligation.
The injunction could not require general monitoring of the content stored by a hosting service, which was prohibited under Article 15(1) of Directive 2000/31.
With reference to external contents there is no general monitoring- and auditing duty.
Furthermore, a general monitoring obligation would be incompatible with art.3 of Directive 2004/48, which states that the measures referred to by the directive must be fair and proportionate and must not be excessively costly.".
Concerning foreign contents no general monitoring and verifying obligation exists.
The project is going to develop also a matching tool that would facilitate the selection of the most appropriate candidate from the SMEs and the general monitoring of the apprenticeship.
It follows that the injunction would impose general monitoring, something which is incompatible with the E-Commerce Directive.
In this regard, may I say that MON 810 was approved in Germany in 2005, then in 2007 sowing of the seeds was stopped andin December 2007 Monsanto submitted a plan for the general monitoring of its cultivation.
Regarding third-party content, however, no general monitoring and review requirements.
The practice of the body is very important with the view of the proper reconciling of the right to freedom of expression andfreedom from discrimination(see section 4 of the study about the general monitoring of the Internet).
Regarding foreign content there are however no general monitoring and review requirements.
Furthermore, such a general monitoring obligation would be incompatible with Article 3 of Directive 2004/48, which states that the measures referred to by the directive must be fair and proportionate and must not be excessively costlysee L'Oréal and Others.
Regarding third-party content, however, there is no general monitoring and assessment requirement.
Such a general monitoring obligation would be incompatible with Article 3 of Directive 2004/48, which states that the measures referred to by the directive must be fair and proportionate and must not be excessively costly(see Scarlet Extended, paragraph 36).
In fact, the role of a host provider carrying out general monitoring would no longer be neutral.
In fact, since a removal obligation does not imply the general monitoring of the information stored by a host provider, but is the consequence of awareness resulting from the notification made by the person concerned or by third parties, there is no breach of the prohibition laid down in Article 15(1) of Directive 2000/31.
This would thus entail a requirement for the hosting provider to carry out general monitoring, which is prohibited by article 15(1) of the E-Commerce Directive.
In short, the role of a host provider carrying out such general monitoring would no longer be neutral, since the activity of that host provider would no longer retain its technical, automatic and passive nature, which would imply that the host provider would be aware of the information stored and would monitor that information.
The Commission should be empowered to oversee the work of the national authorities bymeans of regular audits, re-tests of random samples of the type-approvals issued and general monitoring of the harmonised application of this Regulation.
Accordingly, the filtering system would require that owner to carry out general monitoring of the information stored on its servers, something which is prohibited by the E-Commerce Directive.
Consequently, those rules must, in particular, respect Article 15(1) of Directive 2000/31,which prohibits national authorities from adopting measures which would require an ISP to carry out general monitoring of the information that it transmits on its network.
It follows that that injunction would require the hosting service provider to carry out general monitoring, something which is prohibited by Article 15(1) of Directive 2000/31(see, by analogy, Scarlet Extended, paragraph 40).
Consequently, those rules must, in particular, respect Article 15(1) of Directive 2000/31,which prohibits national authorities from adopting measures which would require an ISP to carry out general monitoring of the information that it transmits on its network.