Примери за използване на Globalisation fund на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
That is what the Globalisation Fund allows us to do.
(ET) I also support the reorganisation of the globalisation fund.
He mentioned the Globalisation Fund, to which there have been seven applications.
The question, however, is whether we are going too far with the amendments to the rules of the Globalisation Fund.
We should also be aware, however, that this Globalisation Fund is not working very well.
Хората също превеждат
The Globalisation Fund is part of competition policy and the Structural Funds. .
In writing.-(SV) We are strongly critical of the reasoning behind the establishment of a Globalisation Fund.
EU Globalisation Fund support for workers increases three-fold in 2010 to over€ 83 million.
We also need to look at a new budget line for the Globalisation Fund, rather than to keep taking money from other lines.
Indeed, the Commission will remember back in January when I and one of my former colleagues, Colm Burke,met him to try and kick-start the globalisation fund for the workers in Dell.
The EU, through the Globalisation Fund, has allocated a fund that will directly help the economically vulnerable in the area.
In my view, this includes, for example, direct payments to farmers,money for the globalisation fund or the administrative costs of European institutions.
The European Union globalisation fund, which is worth €500 million per annum, is available to companies in which large-scale redundancies are made.
On behalf of the IND/DEM Group.- Mr President, if globalisation causes redundancies,there will be a shortfall in revenue so the Globalisation Fund will not have the money it wants to spend.
We do not believe that the EU's Globalisation Fund is the most effective way to support workers who have lost their jobs.
Generally, the Commission, in its proposals before Parliament, is facilitating or-if the proposals are approved- wants to facilitate the use of the European Social Fund and the Globalisation Fund.
In addition, how can we ensure that the Globalisation Fund supports the efforts a company makes for the benefit of its workers instead of largely replacing them?
We have a responsibility to do our best to ensure, first of all, that all criteria are met, butalso to do what is in our power to ensure that the Globalisation Fund ensures added value.
Member States must submit reports on the use of Social Fund and Globalisation Fund money, indicating, in particular, how many new jobs have been created.
I think this is a crucial point in the context of this question,because it has to be recognised that European Union instruments should not only target the impact of companies leaving Europe, like the Globalisation Fund.
A further obstacle for workers trying to access the Globalisation Fund is that it is only available to workers if their government is willing to apply for it and pay the national contribution.
In addition, the Globalisation Fund suffers from a lack of flexibility, and if you are a worker who is made redundant and is unfortunate enough to come from a company that is not on the list, you will simply not be eligible for support.
The EU budget is already bursting at the seams; the European External Action Service, the Galileo system,the Solidarity Fund and the Globalisation Fund are generating expenditure which it was impossible to predict six years ago, when the current financial perspective was negotiated.
I know that you will bring up the newly amended Globalisation Fund, and the fact that it is being used to help even more workers; however, I believe that we must do our utmost to ensure that these people's jobs are safeguarded, so that they will not need to make use of the Globalisation Fund.
Secondly, the EU budget is already bursting at the seams; the European External Action Service, the Galileo system,the Solidarity Fund and the Globalisation Fund are generating expenditure which it was impossible to predict six years ago, when the current financial perspective was negotiated.
(HU) I remember very well when we set up this Globalisation Fund, and even back then, there was a great deal of debate about how it would not be a good idea if, instead of mitigating the losses, the aid paid from the fund helped workers who had been made redundant to re-integrate into the labour market, thereby encouraging, as it were, companies to conveniently take advantage of the relocation facility so that the fund covers the losing parties' costs.
Mr President, we have always advocated that the EU policy on the relocation of businesses should be reviewed, andwe have always believed that the Globalisation Fund is a mere palliative for workers who are the victims of the strategies of multinationals or the lack of an appropriate industrial policy which targets production and good jobs with rights.
Not only have we revised the rules of the globalisation fund, we have also reprogrammed the European Social Fund with the fast-tracking of EUR 1.8 billion to reinforce active labour market policies.
These measures have also been relevant for the textile andclothing industry: for instance, the Globalisation Fund support has been used to reintegrate workers laid off in mostly small and medium-sized enterprises of the sector in Italy, Malta, Spain, Portugal, Lithuania and Belgium.
Let there be an end to money for corrupt countries, to the Globalisation Fund and the Cohesion Fund, to the travelling circus and to the left-wing projects, and let us give Dutch bakers, butchers and greengrocers their hard-earned money back.