Примери за използване на Granting of autocephaly на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The ROC warned that after the granting of autocephaly in Ukraine may spill blood.
The Synod decreed to"renew the decision already made that the Ecumenical Patriarchate proceed to the granting of Autocephaly to the Church of Ukraine".
In all the tomoi on the granting of autocephaly, the title of the new church's primate is clearly established.
Patriarch Bartholomew also stated that"this agreement will help to expedite the granting of autocephaly to the Orthodox Church in Ukraine.".
As a rule, tomoi on the granting of autocephaly do not contain a detailed description of the internal structure of the church being created.
(a) The mother-church, when she receives the request of the ecclesiastical region which is under submission to her, assesses the existing ecclesiological, canonical andpastoral conditions for the granting of autocephaly.
In the tomos on the granting of autocephaly to the Romanian Church(1885), there is no rule about the mandatory receiving of chrism in Constantinople.
The mother Church which receives a request for autocephaly from an ecclesiastical region which depends on it evaluates whether the ecclesiological, canonical andpastoral conditions are satisfied for the granting of autocephaly.
How should the procedure for the granting of autocephaly take place, and how appropriate is such a deal from the point of view of Church traditions?
But it is possible that here it is talking not about a territorial structure, but about the exarchs of the Patriarch of Constantinople, who even after the granting of autocephaly will continue to conduct their ministry in Ukraine.
The reason of this crisis is the imminent granting of autocephaly to the Church of Ukraine or rather the creation of an autocephalous Church in Ukraine.
But it is also possible that this refers not to a territorial structure, but rather to the[persons of the]Exarchs of the Constantinople Patriarch,who will continue, even after the granting of Autocephaly, their terms of service in the Ukraine.
These especially include the decisions related to the granting of autocephaly, based on the principles of Orthodox ecclesiology and canonical order.
The granting of autocephaly to the Ukrainian Church is not just a matter for the Mother Church but a question that concerns all Orthodox faithful, which means our Church too.
We cannot share the view that has been expressed,that any denial of the granting of Autocephaly to Ukraine puts the autocephalies of the 19th and 20th centuries into dispute.
The granting of Autocephaly to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine has not brought the desired Orthodox unity and peace, as happened with all previous cases of granting Autocephaly. .
In 1970, the rupture between Moscow andConstantinople- following the granting of autocephaly to the Orthodox Church in America by the Russian Church- blocked the process once again.
In almost all the tomoi on the granting of autocephaly, there is discussion of the need for newly-created churches to receive holy chrism from the Patriarch of Constantinople.
In this regard, the Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch mentioned the intra-Orthodox controversies in particular between the Patriarchate of Moscow and the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople,arising from the granting of autocephaly(full independence) to a national Orthodox Church in Ukraine(which the Patriarchate of Moscow considers as its"canonical territory").
There is no way that we can justify the granting of autocephaly as a punishment against the Russian Patriarchate for“arrogance”,“anti-ecclesiastical acts”,“worldliness”, etc.
Moscow Patriarch: the Granting of autocephaly of the Ukrainian Church is not just a question of the Church of Constantinople, but all Orthodox and, therefore, our Orthodox Church.
In his letter addressed to the Bishops' Council and His Beatitude,Metropolitan Simeon of New Smyrna notes that the granting of autocephaly to Ukraine under the conditions in which it was granted,“has nothing in common with other autocephalies that were previously granted” by the Patriarchate of Constantinople.
All tomoi about the granting of autocephaly without exception contain the requirement that the primate of the church being created commemorates the Patriarch of Constantinople and all the other primates of the local churches in the diptychs.
In his letter to the Council of Hierarchs and His Beatitude the Chairman,Metropolitan Symeon of New Smyrna notes that the granting of autocephaly to Ukraine under the conditions in which it was provided“bears no resemblance to the other autocephalies that were previously granted” by the Patriarchate of Constantinople.
With great sorrow and concern we learn about what is happening in the Orthodox Church as a whole because of the non-canonical granting of autocephaly to the schismatics of Ukraine without the consent of the canonical autonomous Church headed by Metropolitan Onuphry, which continues to consider the new autocephalites as schismatics, having no communion with them and, on the basis of the sacred canons, with all of those who have communion with the schismatics.
Supreme Patriarch andCatholicos of All Armenians Karekin II said the Armenian Apostolic Church does not support granting a tomos of autocephaly to Ukraine.
That is, it was the Greek government's appeal that initiated the process of granting autocephaly.
The Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople on September 7“within the framework of preparations for granting autocephaly to the Orthodox Church in Ukraine” appointed its exarchs in Kiev, which is a canonical territory of the Moscow Patriarchate.
In early October, the Patriarchate of Constantinople removed the anathema from their leaders andannounced that it was beginning the process of granting autocephaly to Ukraine.
The Synod of the Patriarchate of Constantinople met in session on October 9-11 to declare that it was beginning the procedure of granting autocephaly to the Ukrainian Church.