Примери за използване на Impairment compared на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
There was up to about 2.5-fold increase in AUC in women with hepatic impairment compared to healthy subjects.
The half-life of enzalutamide was however doubled in patients with severe hepatic impairment compared with healthy controls(10.4 days compared to 4.7 days), possibly related to an increased tissue distribution.
Available clinical data indicate similar exposure of regorafenib and its metabolites M-2 and M-5 in patients with mild, moderate orsevere renal impairment compared to patients with normal renal function.
Cmax and AUC of rivastigmine were more than twice as high in subjects with moderate renal impairment compared with healthy subjects; however there were no changes in Cmax and AUC of rivastigmine in subjects with severe renal impairment. .
Following a single 150 mg dose, idelalisib AUC(total, i.e., bound plus unbound)was~60% higher in moderate and severe impairment compared to matched controls.
Metabolite were not meaningfully different in subjects with hepatic impairment compared to normal control subjects(see sections 4.2, 4.4 and 4.8).
AUC of the microbiologically inactive ring-opened metabolite(doripenem-M-1)is expected to be considerably increased in patients with severe renal impairment compared with healthy subjects.
Maximum concentrations and total exposure of netupitant were increased in subjects with mild(n=8), moderate(n=8), and severe(n=2)hepatic impairment compared to matching healthy subjects, although there was pronounced individual variability in both hepatically-impaired and healthy subjects.
Total exposure to alogliptin was approximately 10% lower andpeak exposure was approximately 8% lower in patients with moderate hepatic impairment compared to control subjects.
Total clearance of ibandronic acid was reduced to 44 ml/min in the subjects with severe renal impairment compared with 129 mL/min in subjects with normal renal function.
Individuals who paint, sculpt, practice photography and drawing in middle andold age had 73% less chances of developing mild cognitive impairment compared to those who didn't.
The unbound fraction of voxilaprevir was approximately 2-fold higher in severe hepatic impairment compared with moderate hepatic impairment or normal hepatic function.
Due to modest decreases in protein binding of aprepitant in patients with renal disease,the AUC of pharmacologically active unbound aprepitant was not significantly affected in patients with renal impairment compared with healthy subjects.
Corresponding values for the main metabolite were higher in subjects with renal impairment compared to healthy subjects.
Following a single 150 mg dose, no clinically relevant changes in exposures to idelalisib orGS-563117 were observed in subjects with severe renal impairment compared to healthy subjects.
A doubling of exposure(AUC)was observed in patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment compared to healthy subjects.
Following administration of a single 50 mg dose, the AUC0- of eltrombopag was 32% to 36% lower in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment, and60% lower in patients with severe renal impairment compared with healthy volunteers.
Dexmedetomidine plasma protein binding is decreased in subjects with hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects.
In plasma as well as CSF, concentrations of aciclovir, CMMG and 8-OH-ACV were on average 2, 4 and 5-6 times higher,respectively, at severe renal impairment compared with normal renal function.
The median Tmax for M19 was delayed to 204 hours in patients with mild ormoderate hepatic impairment compared to 168 hours in healthy subjects.
M4 Cmax and AUCinf was 39% and 34% lower respectively, resulting in a combined exposure of alectinib and M4(AUCinf)1.8-fold higher in patients with severe hepatic impairment compared with matched healthy subjects.
Overall, mean dose- andweight- normalised exposure values for riociguat were higher in subjects with renal impairment compared to subjects with normal renal function.
Following the administration of a single 50 mg dose, the AUC0- of eltrombopag was 41% higher in patients with mild hepatic impairment and80% to 93% higher in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment compared with healthy volunteers.
No clinically relevant differences in the pharmacokinetics of pirfenidone were observed in subjects with mild to severe renal impairment compared with subjects with normal renal function.
No clinically relevant changes were observed in the total Cmax and AUC of isavuconazole in subjects with mild, moderate orsevere renal impairment compared to subjects with normal renal function.
Upadacitinib Cmax was unchanged in subjects with mild hepatic impairment and43% higher in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal liver function.
In a small pharmacokinetic study, the Cmax andAUC of prucalopride were, on average, 10-20% higher in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects(see sections 4.2 and 4.4).
In a study evaluating the influence of renal function on ranolazine pharmacokinetics, ranolazine AUC was on average 1.7- to 2-fold higher in subjects with mild, moderate, andsevere renal impairment compared with subjects with normal renal function.
The dosing recommendations in patients with renal impairment, with increased dosing interval, are expected to result in higher peak plasma concentrations andlower Cmin levels in patients with renal impairment compared with patients with normal renal function.
The dosing recommendations in patients with renal impairment, with increased dosing interval, are expected to result in higher peak plasma concentrations andlower Cmin levels in patients with renal impairment compared with patients with normal renal function.