Примери за използване на Irregular expenditure на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
IACS is an effective control system to limit the risk of irregular expenditure.
(a)the irregular expenditure which has been subject to financial corrections in accordance with Article 97;
Systems are effective when they prevent orotherwise detect and correct irregular expenditure.
Member States are required to recover the irregular expenditure from the concerned project beneficiaries.
Taken together, these measures reduce the risk of the EU budget co-financing irregular expenditure.
The irregular expenditure found in the sample as a proportion of the total expenditure checked is the error rate.
Of interim payments is systematically withheld to protect the EU budget from the effects of irregular expenditure.
When it is not possible to quantify precisely the amount of irregular expenditure, the Commission shall apply a flat rate or extrapolated financial correction.
IACS, where properly applied, is an effective control system for limiting the risk of error or irregular expenditure.
However, if the irregular expenditure had not yet been claimed for reimbursement from the EU budget, the financial correction addresses the future(ex- ante financial correction).
This entails identifying the EU share in co-financing of any irregular expenditure and returning it to the EU budget.
The Commission considers that the IACS is generally an effective control system for limiting the risk of error or irregular expenditure.
Description of the principal results of the audits,indicating in particular the amount of irregular expenditure and the error rate resulting fromthe random sample audited(1).
Financial corrections: Financial corrections aim at protecting the EU budget from the burden of erroneous or irregular expenditure.
When it is not possible to quantify precisely the amount of irregular expenditure charged to the EMFF, the Commission shall apply a flat rate or extrapolated financial correction.
The Commission considers that the utmost objective is that deficiencies are remedied and that all irregular expenditure is corrected.
Financial corrections can be made by withdrawing irregular expenditure from Member States' expenditure declarations or through recoveries from beneficiaries.
The Commission considers the procurement procedures currently in place to be adequate for limiting the risk of error or irregular expenditure.
The Commission expects its audit strategy to significantly reduce the level of irregular expenditure in final claims but not to reduce the final level of error below 2%.
This means that it is not possible to conclude whether they are effective in decreasing the level of illegal and/or irregular expenditure.
If the irregular expenditure leading to the financial correction has already been claimed for reimbursement from the EU budget, the financial correction corrects the past(ex- post financial correction).
Member States bear primary responsibility for preventing ordetecting and correcting irregular expenditure and report to the Commission.
In the Structural Funds, Member States withdraw irregular expenditure found in their control and audit work from the expenditure declared for the programme or project concerned.
The Commission considers that the IACS is generally an effective control system for limiting the risk of error or irregular expenditure.
Financial corrections for system deficiencies in the closure process as well as irregular expenditure detected after closure will always result in a net reduction of the EU assistance.
The national authorities accepted to withdraw the expenditure related to the entire project andthus the related irregular expenditure in late 2012.
The issue of retrospective projects differs from the replacement of irregular expenditure by legal and regular expenditure, in full conformity to all rules applicable to the operational programme.
The materiality level used by the Commission is 2%, which refers to the ratio of erroneous or irregular expenditure to the EU spending audited.
The levels of financial corrections in the two periods need, however, to be put into perspective andmust be compared with the underlying level of irregular expenditure.
Member States bear primary responsibility for preventing ordetecting and correcting irregular expenditure, and report on this subject to the Commission.