Примери за използване на Matthew and luke на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Read the Gospels of Matthew and Luke.
Only Matthew and Luke tell the story of Jesus' birth.
Why is Mark thought to be where the authors of Matthew and Luke got material?
Only Matthew and Luke record the birth of Jesus.
The early church father, Augustine, considered Mark to be a mere abbreviation of Matthew and Luke.
Of these, only Matthew and Luke describe the birth of Jesus.
The existence of Q source is based on the fact that there are passages in Matthew and Luke that are identical.
Unlike Matthew and Luke, Mark has no stories of Jesus' birth.
Beyond a few basics,the nativity stories in Matthew and Luke have remarkably little overlap.
Unlike Matthew and Luke, Mark tells us nothing about Jesus' birth or childhood.
However, there is good reason to believe that Matthew and Luke are in fact tracing entirely different genealogies.
Unlike Matthew and Luke, Mark does not describe Jesus' birth and infancy.
Jesus' being from God, as affirmed by the tradi tion preserved by Matthew and Luke, would be concretely underlined once more.
Unlike Matthew and Luke, he doesn't concern himself at all with Jesus' birth or childhood.
If it existed,scholars believe that it was used by ancient writers to help craft the gospels of Matthew and Luke.
This is why Mark, Matthew and Luke are called the synoptic gospels.
Mark also has a greater number of“problem passages,” difficult statements and actions by Jesus that Matthew and Luke tend to smooth out.
Only Matthew and Luke tell of the Birth and childhood of Jesus Matthew….
Mark tells us that Jesus was tempted by Satan,but it is in Matthew and Luke that the details of the temptation are fleshed out.
Matthew and Luke both portray the temptation in the wilderness as a dialogue between Jesus and Satan.
Most of the parables are recorded in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, although Mark does record some not recorded by the others.
Matthew and Luke describe the temptations by recounting the details of the conversations between Jesus and Satan.
A significant majority of scholars consider it to have been thefirst Gospel written and a primary source for both Matthew and Luke.
After the Gospels of Matthew and Luke were bundled into the Catholic Bible, the two infancy stories merged.
I have set out here,in dialogue with exegetes past and present, to interpret what Matthew and Luke say about Jesus' infancy at the beginning of their Gospels.'.
For example, Matthew and Luke give completely different versions of Jesus' last words, both of these versions incidentally, are direct quotations from the Old Testament.".
Here I have sought to interpret, in dialogue with exegetes of the past and of the present, what Matthew and Luke recount at the beginning of their Gospels about the infancy of Jesus.".
It is extremely doubtful that Matthew and Luke could build two entirely contradictory genealogies of the same lineage.
Although we no longer have any physical copies of this document we can infer its content by comparing those verses that Matthew and Luke share in common but that do not appear in Mark.”.
According to the gospels of Matthew and Luke, Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spiritand born from the Virgin Mary.