Examples of using Matthew and luke in English and their translations into Swedish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Political
Matthew and Luke push the idea further back.
Sentences contained in Matthew and Luke must also be wrong.
Matthew and Luke omit the very pericopes that occur in Mark.
Had the statement of Matthew and Luke been true, their spir.
let us examine the credibility of the NT witnesses, Matthew and Luke.
A comparison of Matthew and Luke reveals that they have
The silence of the rest of the NT can be explained in essentially the same ways as one would explain the partial silence of Matthew, and Luke.
Matthew and Luke both record that Jesus' enemies accused him of being a"wine-bibber.
Others, again, strongly maintain that Matthew and Luke used Mark
For Matthew and Luke the chief importance of the event seems to be that it calls to mind as a"sign," Isa.
In addition to having in common parts that Mark has not, Matthew and Luke sometimes agree against Mark in parallel narratives.
The authors of Matthew and Luke may also have drawn material from other sources available to them individually.
modern biblical criticism has questioned the authenticity of the accounts in Matthew and Luke.
Matthew and Luke describe the temptations by recounting the details of the conversations between Jesus and Satan.
But one can also go beyond the specific concerns of Matthew and Luke and see that the virgin birth is fully consistent with the whole range of biblical doctrine.
provided much of the narrative material, as well as the chronological framework, for both Matthew and Luke.
According to the gospels of Matthew and Luke, Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit
namely through the material that is common in Matthew and Luke but absent in Mark.
It is significant that even the Gospels of Matthew and Luke are"silent" about the virgin birth through fifty of their combined fifty-two chapters.
which was the common source of sayings used by Matthew and Luke.
However, in these parallel passages of Matthew and Luke there are numerous differences of expression,
It has been called a Gospel of action because it records 18 miracles(similar in count to Matthew and Luke) but only 4 parables(Matthew includes 18 parables and Luke 19).
Matthew and Luke were written at a later time,
by each Evangelist's peculiar method of treating the subject-matter, Matthew and Luke especially having adapted it to the purpose of their Gospel.
Since the elements that are in Matthew and Luke but not in Mark are mostly pairs of quotations rather than detailed narration,
medieval illustration from the Hortus deliciarum of Herrad of Landsberg 12th century Adoration of the Shepherds by Gerard van Honthorst depicts the nativity of Jesus The Nativity stories of Matthew and Luke are prominent in the gospels
Given prominent attention in the first two chapters of Matthew and Luke, Joseph is portrayed as a carpenter in Nazareth, a righteous descendant of Bethlehem's David, and a kind husband and father.
which seems to us impossible, as Matthew and Luke at least appear to have worked independently of each other
There have been counted 240 passages wherein Matthew and Luke harmonize with each other, but disagree with Mark
Whereas the Gospels of Matthew and Luke emphasize the need for a love that goes beyond the circle of those who are on the same side to include even opponents,