Примери за използване на Medicinal product in question на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The instruction calls silicon dioxide the main active ingredient of the medicinal product in question.
If the manufacturing operations of the medicinal product in question have not been inspected recently, i.e.
(a) the medicinal product in question is to be supplied on veterinary prescription only and may, in certain cases, be administered only under strict veterinary supervision;
The marketing authorization may be granted subject to the following conditions:(a) the medicinal product in question is to be supplied on veterinary prescription only and may, in certain cases, be administered only under strict veterinary supervision;
The application for marketing authorisation shall include all the administrative information and scientific documentation necessary for demonstrating the quality, safety andefficacy of the veterinary medicinal product in question.
The medicinal product in question may be supplied on medical prescription only and may in certain cases be administered only under strict medical supervision, possibly in a hospital and in the case of a radiopharmaceutical, by an authorized person; and.
The package leaflet and any medical information shall draw the attention of the medical practitioner to the fact that the particulars available concerning the medicinal product in question are as yet inadequate in certain specified respects.
The medicinal product in question may be supplied on medical prescription only and may in certain cases be administered only under strict medical supervision, possibly in a hospital and in the case of a radio-pharmaceutical, by an authorised person.
For this purpose, the holder of both a patent and a[n SPC]should be able to enjoy an overall maximum of 15 years of exclusivity from the time the medicinal product in question first obtains authorisation to be placed on the market in the[Union].
Consequently, it must be held that it follows from Regulation No 1768/92 read in conjunction with Regulation No 1901/2006 that the SPC and the paediatric extension together confer on the holder of the basic patent an exclusive right of a maximum durationof 15 years and 6 months from the date of the grant of the first marketing authorisation for the medicinal product in question in the EU.
For this purpose, the holder of both a patent and a[n SPC]should be able to enjoy an overall maximum of 15 years of exclusivity from the time the medicinal product in question first obtains authorisation to be placed on the market in the[Union].
The national court questions whether the entry into force of Regulation No 1901/2006 providing a reward in the form of a paediatric extension of six months alters the approach adopted until now according to which the delivery of the SPC is only possible where five years have elapsed between the patent application and the first marketing authorisation of the medicinal product in question in the EU.
If a marketing authorisation holder intends to withdraw such a medicinal product from the market then arrangements should be in place so thatthe paediatric population can continue to have access to the medicinal product in question.
It is only in the case where the period between lodging the basic patent application andthe date of the first marketing authorisation in the EU for the medicinal product in question is exactly five years that an SPC can have a duration equal to zero and that the starting point of the paediatric extension of six months is concurrent with the expiry date of the basic patent.
For the purposes of this Directive,"residues" means all active substances or metabolites thereof which remain in meat orother foodstuffs produced from the animal to which the medicinal product in question has been administered.
As for Regulation No 1901/2006, which amended, inter alia, Article 13 of Regulation No 1768/92, in its original version, it must be noted that, as is apparent from recital 26 thereto,its aim is to grant a reward for the effort involved in evaluating the paediatric effects of the medicinal product in question, by awarding a six-month extension of the SPC to the holder of the basic patent who conducted all the research proposed in the paediatric investigation plan approved for the medicinal product in question. .
The holder of a distribution authorisation shall have an emergency plan guaranteeing the effective implementation of any recall operation ordered by the competent authorities orundertaken in cooperation with the manufacturer of the medicinal product in question or the holder of the marketing authorisation.
For this purpose, the holder of both a patent and a certificate should be able to enjoy an overall maximum of 15 years of exclusiv[it]y from the time the medicinal product in question first obtains authorisation to be placed on the market in the Community;
The wholesale distributor shall have an emergency plan guaranteeing the effective implementation of any withdrawal ordered by the competent authorities orthe Commission or undertaken in cooperation with the manufacturer of the veterinary medicinal product in question or marketing authorisation holder.
The package leaflet and any medical information must draw the attention of the medical practitioner to the fact that the particulars available concerning the medicinal product in question are as yet inadequate in certain specified respects.
For this purpose, the holder of both a patent anda certificate should be able to enjoy an overall maximum of 15 years of exclusivity from the time the medicinal product in question first obtains[an MA] in the Community.
For this purpose, the holder of both a patent anda certificate should be able to enjoy an overall maximum of 15 years of exclusivity from the time the medicinal product in question first obtains[an MA] in the Community.
Similarly, the eighth recital in the preamble states that the holder of both a patent andan SPC should be able to enjoy an overall maximum of fifteen years of exclusivity from the time the medicinal product in question first obtains authorisation to be placed on the market in the Community.
Where the provisions of this Title are not complied with, and a notice served on the person concerned has remained without effect, the competent authorities of the Member States may suspend the marketing authorization, until the labelling andthe package leaflet of the medicinal product in question have been made to comply with the requirements of this Title.
The exporter is not the manufacturer of the medicinal products in question and has not obtained a signed end-user declaration from the end-user in the country of destination;
The exporter is the manufacturer of the medicinal products in question and has not made a legally binding agreement with the distributor requiring the latter to make all supplies and transfers subject to the conclusion of a legally binding agreement requiring, preferably subject to a dissuasive contractual penalty, the customer.
Competent authorities may require marketing authorisation holders to provide them with sufficient quantities of the veterinary medicinal products to enable controls to be made on the identification of the presence of residues of the veterinary medicinal products in question.
The competent authority may require the applicant orthe marketing authorisation holder to provide sufficient quantities of the substances to enable controls to be made on the identification of the presence of residues of the veterinary medicinal products in question.
If an animal is being imported from, or exported to, a third country and is thereby subject to specific binding health rules,a competent authority may permit the use, for the animal in question, of an immunological veterinary medicinal product that is not covered by a marketing authorisation in the Member State in question but is authorised under the legislation of the third country.