Примери за използване на Moral absolutism на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Moral absolutism is incompatible with politics.
Answer: Moral relativism is more easily understood in comparison to moral absolutism.
Moral absolutism: There is at least one principle that ought never to be violated.
Moral absolutism is not the same as moral universalism(also called moral objectivism).
The ultimate statement of Rand's moral absolutism heads the title page of Nathaniel Branden's book.
Moral absolutism may be understood in a strictly secular context, as in many forms of deontological moral rationalism.
Ethical theories which place strong emphasis on rights and duty, such as the deontological ethics of Immanuel Kant,are often forms of moral absolutism, as are many religious moral codes.
Also note that moral absolutism is a different thing than moral objectivism(also called“moral realism”).
The world over, there are roughly 2.3 billion Christians, according to the Pew Research Center,most of which adhere to the basic belief of God and the moral absolutism as described in the Bible, which is considered religious fundamentalism.
As compared with relativism, moral absolutism is more associated with religion since church doctrines often endorse specific ethical guidelines.
Kant 's major contribution to Ethics was the theory of the Categorical Imperative, that we should act only in such a way that we would want our actions to become a universal law, applicable to everyone in a similar situation Moral Universalism andthat we should treat other individuals as ends in themselves, not as mere means Moral Absolutism, even if that means sacrificing the greater good.
Under moral absolutism is graded absolutism which views a certain standard as either greater or less than another moral absolute.
Meta-ethical absolutism, philosophical absolutism, moral absolutism, and political absolutism are some types of absolutism while types of skepticism are philosophical skepticism, Pyrrhonic skepticism, moral skepticism, religious skepticism, and metaphysical skepticism.
Moral absolutism is an ethical view that certain actions are absolutely right or wrong, regardless of other contexts such as their consequences or the intentions behind them.
Moral absolutism stands in contrast to other categories of normative ethical theories such as consequentialism, which holds that the morality(in the wide sense) of an act depends on the consequences or the context of the act.
Everyone should be judged according to their own moral code| Absolutism.
And this should surprise no one who takes his critique of moral and religious absolutism seriously.
Absolutism maintains that moral values are fixed regardless of time, place, and the people concerned.
Conflicting absolutism contends that when moral laws conflict, doing the lesser evil is excusable.
In absolutism, the moral guidelines are definite while those of relativism are dependent on the contexts of various situations.
Unqualified absolutism contends that these absolute moral principles never conflict, while the other two assert they sometimes do conflict.
Both absolutism and relativism are philosophical concepts on moral values.
The second direction, which is studied by scientists,assumes that the attribution of absolutism, generally accepted and binding moral standards, plays the role of a certain fanaticism.
The major categories of relativism are moral, truth, descriptive, and normative while absolutism does not have major categories.
Absolutism does not consider consequences as its moral tenets are deontological or only based on the specified rules whereas relativism is teleological or values the results of one's actions.
On the contrary, absolutism does not look into diversity as it strictly adheres to the moral guidelines;
Some philosophers are of the view that absolutism leads to justice and order in society as law or universal moral ethics are the same for everyone.
The very fact that we should tolerate people(even when we disagree)is based on the absolute moral rule that we should always treat people fairly- but that is absolutism again!
A usual example of absolutism is Kantian ethics which asserts that an action is moral if the intention behind it is moral. .