Примери за използване на Objective of directive на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Article 1 describes the objective of Directive 98/84.
The objective of Directive 95/46 is set out in its first article.
The second part of the second ground of appeal,alleging disregard of the objective of Directive 2003/87.
The objective of Directive 2014/34/EU is to ensure free movement for the products to which it.
An interpretation such as that suggested by DAB andPro Display would, moreover, be incompatible with the objective of Directive 2000/78, which aims in particular to enable a person with a disability to have access to or participate in employment.
Хората също превеждат
The objective of directive 94/9/EC is to ensure free movement of the products throughout the EU territory.
A different interpretation would deprive the freedom of movement enjoyed by citizens of the Union of its practical effect, whereas the objective of Directive 2004/38 is precisely to strengthen the right to freedom of movement.
It further points out that the objective of Directive 2005/29 is to guarantee a high level of consumer protection.
The objective of directive 94/9/EC is to ensure free movement for the products to which it applies in the EU territory.
The Commission has completely failed to prove that it is impossible to comply with the objective of Directive 2003/87 having regard to the allocation of powers between the Member States and the Commission, as confirmed by the General Court in the judgment under appeal.
The objective of Directive 2003/87, and the operation of the procedure for review of the national allocation plans, was‘to guarantee that the national allocation plans for all the Member States are in comparable situations'.
In that regard,it must be noted that the declared principal objective of Directive 2003/87 is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions substantially in order to be able to fulfil the commitments of the European Union and its Member States under the Kyoto Protocol.
(2) The objective of Directive 90/434/EEC is that taxation of the income, profits and capital gains from business reorganisations should be deferred and Member States taxing rights safeguarded.
In that regard, it must be recalled that the objective of Directive 2008/115, as is apparent from recitals 2 and 4 in the preamble thereto, is the establishment of an effective removal and repatriation policy.
The objective of Directive 2014/34/EU is to ensure the free movement of goods, to which it applies, in the EU.
It follows that the principal declared objective of Directive 2003/87 is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions substantially in order to be able to fulfil the commitments of the Community and its Member States under the Kyoto Protocol.
Whereas the objective of Directive 2008/52/EC is to promote the amicable settlement of disputes by encouraging the use of mediation and by ensuring a balanced relationship between mediation and judicial proceedings.
It thus follows from the wording,general scheme and objective of Directive 2008/115 that the period of application of the entry ban does not begin to run until the date on which the person concerned has actually left the territory of the Member States.
In that regard, the objective of Directive 2008/115, as is apparent from recitals 2 and 4 in the preamble thereto, is the establishment of an effective removal and repatriation policy.
Secondly, the material objective of Directive 2006/24 is, as follows from Article 1(1) thereof, to ensure that the data are available for the purpose of the investigation, detection and prosecution of serious crime, as defined by each Member State in its national law.
Whereas the objective of Directive 89/48/EEC is to ensure that a lawyer is integrated into the profession in the host Member State, and the Directive seeks neither to modify the rules regulating the profession in that State nor to remove such a lawyer from the ambit of those rules;
As I observed above, the objective of Directive 2016/343 is to strengthen certain aspects of the presumption of innocence in order to enhance the Member States' trust in each other's criminal justice systems and mutual recognition of judgments and other judicial decisions.
However, given the objective of Directive 2001/42, which consists in providing for a high level of protection of the environment, the provisions which delimit the directive's scope, in particular those setting out the definitions of the measures envisaged by the directive, must be interpreted broadly.
Thus, with a view to safeguarding the objective of Directive 2001/29, as soon as that person is alerted to that fact by the rightholder or as soon as he becomes aware of it for some other reason, he should avert a further copyright infringement by avoiding any new communication to the public of the protected work.
The objective of Directive 93/7/EEC was to ensure the physical return of the cultural objects to the Member State from whose territory those objects have been unlawfully removed, irrespective of the property rights applying to such objects.
In that regard, the Court made clear that the objective of Directive 95/46 is to ensure effective protection of the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons, and in particular the right to privacy, with respect to the processing of personal data and that the expression‘in the context of the activities' cannot be interpreted restrictively.
In the light of the objective of Directive 2010/24, which is to ensure, inter alia, that the requested Member State assists the requesting Member State in the recovery of the latter's claims, the grant of preferences under the third subparagraph of Article 13(1) of Directive 2010/24 must operate for the benefit, rather than to the detriment, of the requesting Member State.”.
It follows from the objective of Directive 92/85, from the wording of Article 8 thereof, which expressly refers to confinement, and from the case-law of the Court cited in paragraphs 32 to 34 of the present judgment, that the purpose of the maternity leave provided for in Article 8 of that directive is to protect the health of the mother of the child in the especially vulnerable situation arising from her pregnancy.
That finding is supported by the objective of Directive 2001/18, which seeks, as is apparent from Article 1 thereof, in accordance with the precautionary principle, to protect human health and the environment when, first, GMOs are deliberately released into the environment for any purpose other than placing on the market within the European Union and, secondly, when GMOs are placed on the market within the European Union as or in products.
Consequently, it follows from the objective of Directive 92/85, from the wording of Article 8 thereof, which expressly refers to confinement, and from the case-law of the Court cited in paragraphs 32 to 34 of the present judgment, that the purpose of the maternity leave provided for in Article 8 of that directive is to protect the health of the mother of the child in the especially vulnerable situation arising from her pregnancy.