Примери за използване на Obtained by mutagenesis на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The classification of organisms obtained by mutagenesis as‘GMOs'.
Those varieties obtained by mutagenesis however have also made it possible to develop elements of resistance to a selective herbicide.
However, no mention in Directive 2002/53 of any exemption that would apply to organisms obtained by mutagenesis.
Second, there can be organisms obtained by mutagenesis that do fulfil the criteria.
In the main proceedings, the Applicants have requested the referring court to impose a moratorium on herbicide tolerant varieties obtained by mutagenesis.
First, there can be organisms obtained by mutagenesis that are not GMOs within the meaning of the GMO Directive, because they do not fulfil the criteria of Article 2(2).
In my view, provided that they meet the substantive conditions of Article 2(2)of the GMO Directive, organisms obtained by mutagenesis are GMO's within the meaning of the GMO Directive.”.
According to Advocate General Bobek,organisms obtained by mutagenesis are, in principle, exempted from the obligations in the Genetically Modified Organisms Directive.
The use of herbicide resistant seed varieties obtained by mutagenesis carries a risk of significant harm to the environment and to human and animal health.
They therefore brought judicial proceedings before the referring court,seeking the annulment of a national provision that exempts organisms obtained by mutagenesis from the obligations applying to GMOs.
The Applicants contest the fact that organisms obtained by mutagenesis are exempt from the obligations laid down by the provisions of the Environmental Code concerning GMOs.
Accordingly, that space remains unoccupied and, provided that the Member States respect theiroverall EU law obligations, they can legislate with regard to organisms obtained by mutagenesis.
The delegation also reminded EU ministers that organisms obtained by mutagenesis have been used in farming for many years and have a long safety track record.
That would then mean that that space remains unoccupied and, provided that the Member States respect theiroverall EU law obligations, they can legislate with regard to organisms obtained by mutagenesis.
Of the Environmental Code to the extent that that provision exempts organisms obtained by mutagenesis from the obligations laid down by the national measures transposing the GMO Directive.
(2) Do varieties obtained by mutagenesis constitute genetically modified varieties within the meaning of Article 4 of Directive[2002/53] which would not be exempt from the obligations laid down in that directive?
In a note to EU farm ministers,the Dutch delegation also reminded that organisms obtained by mutagenesis have been used in farming for many years and have a long safety track record.
They claim that organisms obtained by mutagenesis are GMOs within the meaning of that latter provision, although, pursuant to Article 3 and Annex I B, they are exempt from the obligations laid down for the release and placing on the market of GMOs.
Provided that they meet the substantivecriteria of Article 2(2) of Directive 2001/18, organisms obtained by mutagenesis are genetically modified organisms within the meaning of that directive;
It was established above(53) that organisms obtained by mutagenesis may constitute GMOs within the meaning of Article 2(2) of the GMO Directive, provided that they meet the substantive criteria announced in that provision.
(56) Thus, it is clear that obligations deriving from several other EU secondary law instruments may also apply to organisms obtained by mutagenesis, in addition to those resulting from Directive 2002/53.
The Applicants therefore claim that varieties obtained by mutagenesis are genetically modified varieties under Directive 2002/53 and that they should be subject, under Article 7(4)(a), to‘an environmental risk assessment equivalent' to that provided for in the GMO Directive.
One concluding remark is perhaps called for,in particular in the view of the assertions repetitively made in these proceedings that organisms obtained by mutagenesis fall short of any control and supervision.
Prior to that, its predecessor, Directive 90/220,exempted organisms obtained by mutagenesis on the sole condition that‘they do not involve the use of GMOs as recipient or parental organisms'.
(1) Do organisms obtained by mutagenesis constitute genetically modified organisms within the meaning of Article 2 of Directive[2001/18], although they are exempt under Article 3 of and Annex I B to the directive from the obligations laid down for release and placing on the market of genetically modified organisms?
It is suggested that given theabsence of assessment and surveillance of the organisms obtained by mutagenesis, there is a danger of a risk that ought to trigger the precautionary principle.
In July 2018, the European Court of Justice(ECJ)ruled that organisms obtained by mutagenesis plant breeding technique are genetically modified organisms(GMOs) and should, in principle, fall under the GMO Directive.
In their opinion,an update is necessary after last year's ruling by the European Court of Justice saying that organisms obtained by mutagenesis should be considered GMOs and therefore subject to the safety and marketing obligations laid down in the EU's GMO directive.
According to the Commission, in so far as Directive 2001/18 excludes from its scope organisms obtained by mutagenesis, it does not prohibit Member States from adopting measures regulating those organisms, provided that other rules arising from EU law, such as, in particular, those relating to the free movement of goods, are respected.