Примери за използване на Primary endpoints на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Key primary endpoints.
A Numbers in bold font are the results of primary endpoints.
The primary endpoints were safety and pharmacokinetics(PK).
All regimens were superior to placebo in terms of the two primary endpoints, and these were considered relevant.
The primary endpoints of the trial were objective response rate and progression-free survival.
Хората също превеждат
The study consisted of two parts with two independent primary endpoints(successful steroid taper and time to flare).
The primary endpoints of the trial were objective response rate and progression-free survival.
The effects of diacerein on pain and physical functioning of the joints have been evaluated in a number of studies as primary endpoints.
For both studies, the primary endpoints were ACR20 response rate and change from baseline in HAQ-DI at month 3.
Memantine-treated patients showed a statistically significantly better effect than placebo-treated patients on the primary endpoints.
The primary endpoints for both trials were time to tumour progression, objective tumour response rate, and safety.
In a dose ranging study, etoricoxib 60 mg demonstrated significantly greater improvement than 30 mg for all 3 primary endpoints over 6 weeks of treatment.
The two primary endpoints of the study were progression-free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS) of IMFINZI vs. placebo.
Wound halves treated with Episalvan healed faster than the wound halves treated with standard of care(mean 1.1 days according to primary endpoints, p< 0.0001, two-sided paired t-test).
For both primary endpoints statistically significant differences have been observed for the doses 1 mg/24 h, 2 mg/24 h and 3 mg/24 h in comparison to placebo.
Studies of MabThera in patients with early arthritis(patients without prior methotrexate treatment and patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate, but not yet treated with TNF-alpha inhibitors)have met their primary endpoints.
The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who achieved an ACR20 response at Week 24 and the changes from baseline HAQ-DI score at Week 12.
The changes from baseline in both primary endpoints(mNIS+7 and Norfolk QoL-DN) demonstrated statistically significant benefit in favour of inotersen treatment at Week 66(Table 4).
Primary endpoints were serum uric acid area under the curve(AUCsUA1-8) and change in serum creatinine(sC) level both from baseline to Day 8.
In GO-FORWARD, the(co-)primary endpoints were the percentage of patients achieving an ACR 20 response at week 14 and the improvement from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire(HAQ) at week 24.
Primary endpoints included platelet count change from baseline in study C08-002A/B and thrombotic microangiopathy(TMA) event-free status in study C08-003A/B.
The success rate on Day 4 and Day 7(primary endpoints) were significantly higher in the Resflor than in the saline group(Day 4: Resflor 96.9% versus saline 61.9%; Day 7: Resflor 92.2% versus saline 47.6%; p< 0.0001- Fischer exact test).
For both primary endpoints statistically significant differences have been observed for the pramipexole dose groups 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg and 0.75 mg in comparison to placebo.
The main primary endpoints of this study were the incidence and severity of adverse events associated with long-term exposure to ambrisentan, including serum LFTs.
The two primary endpoints were the percentage of patients achieving ACR 20 response at Week 12 and change from baseline in modified Total Sharp Score(mTSS) at Week 24.
The primary endpoints in the phase 3 studies were the percent reduction in POS frequency over placebo and the 50% responder rate based on 50% reduction in POS frequency from baseline.
The primary endpoints were change from baseline(CFB) in Patient Global Impression(SGI) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis(QMG) score at Day 4.
The primary endpoints of this study, progression-free survival(PFS), as assessed by hazard ratio, and overall response rate(ORR) were determined based on assessments made by a blinded Independent Review Committee(IRC).
The newly defined primary endpoints in this re-evaluation were evaluated with adequate statistical methodology and were strict with regards to treatment success, because only patients completely free of symptoms were counted as“responders”.
The primary endpoints were time to first event of the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke(MACE) and time to first event of the composite of hospitalisation for heart failure or cardiovascular death.