Примери за използване на Procedural legality на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Procedural legality is carefully looked at.
The court will look at the procedural legality of EIA decisions.
Both procedural legality and substantive legality are subject to the court's control.
Courts review both the substantive as well as procedural legality of administrative decisions.
The environmental impact study is controlled because it is the main aspect of the procedural legality.
Review of procedural legality means that courts will check whether your procedural rights have been infringed.
There is a possibility to file an extraordinary request for review(felülvizsgálati kérelem)against a final judgment of the court to the Supreme Court challenging the procedural legality of the decision.
The administrative courts review the procedural legality and the substantive legality of all administrative decisions.
Member States shall ensure that, in accordance with the relevant national legal system, members of the public concerned have access to a review procedure before a court of law or another independent andimpartial body established by law to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of decisions, acts or omissions subject to Article 26 when one of the following conditions is met.
Controlling procedural legality in environmental decision-making does not differ from doing this in any other administrative process.
Article 9(2) and(4) of the[Aarhus] Convention provides for access to judicial orother procedures for challenging the substantive or procedural legality of decisions, acts or omissions subject to the public participation provisions of Article 6 of the Convention.'.
The administrative courts review the procedural legality and the substantive legality of IPPC decisions as well as the legality of all administrative decisions.
Have access to a review procedure before a court of law or another independent andimpartial body established by law to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of decisions, acts or omissions subject to the public participation provisions of this Directive.
The administrative courts review the procedural legality and the substantive legality of IPPC _ftn2[2] decisions as well as the legality of all administrative decisions.
Member States shall ensure that natural or legal persons or their associations, organisations or groups, in accordance with national legislation or practice, have access to a review procedure before a court of law or another independent andimpartial body established by law to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of decisions, actions or omissions related to the implementation of Articles 5, 6, 7 and 8 when one of the following conditions is fulfilled.
Article 11(1) refers to challenges to the substantive or procedural legality of decisions, acts or omissions‘subject to the public participation provisions of this Directive'.
Given the above, by virtue of Article 11(1) of Directive 2011/92,the scope of the NPE rule thus includes review procedures before courts‘to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of decisions, acts or omissions subject to the public participation provisions of this Directive', namely‘judicial proceedings' in this area of environmental law.
The court will revise both procedural and substantive legality of EIA decisions.
Exercise control over the legality of coercive procedural measures;
The administrative judge may only review the procedural and substantive legality of the administrative decision.
The administrative courts while considering the case, verify both procedural and substantive legality of the decision.
In the course of examining the case, the court will review both procedural and substantive legality of the decision.
Both the procedural and substantial legality of the challenged decision are liable to review, as well as underlying material and technical findings.
Cases in which the procedural or substantive legality of an administrative decision is challenged before a court the Hungarian courts have exclusive jurisdiction.
Ordinary appeals can be submitted in private law disputes against the substantive judgment,challenging both the procedural and substantive legality of the decision.
Both procedural as well as substantive legality of administrative activities may be challenged;
The legality of procedural acts of the EPPO that are intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties should be subject to judicial review before national courts.
As usual, both the procedural as well as substantial legality of the activity may be challenged.
The courts are entitled to review the procedural and substantive legality of EIA decisions and to verify material and technical findings and calculations as well as the EIA documents.
The administrative court is competent to review both the procedural and substantive legality of administrative decisions, and, with the exception of municipal appeals(see section II, above), is not strictly bound to allegations specifically presented in the appeal.