Примери за използване на Re-examination procedure на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Re-examination procedure.
Grounds for the CHMP opinion following the re-examination procedure.
Re-examination procedure.
Conclusions on the benefit-risk balance following the re-examination procedure.
Re-examination procedure.
The evaluation had finished and the CHMP had given a negative opinion,which had been confirmed following a re-examination procedure.
The re-examination procedure started on 3 May 2012.
During its meeting of 8-10 December 2009 the CVMP appointed Dr J. Hederová as the rapporteur and Dr J. Bureš as the co-rapporteur for the re-examination procedure.
The re-examination procedure started on 11 June 2013.
Following a request from the MAH, the CHMP convened a Scientific Advisory Group(SAG)CNS during the re-examination procedure.
The re-examination procedure started on 27 April 2013.
The detailed grounds for the re-examination were submitted by CEVA Animal Health Ltd on 21 September 2009 and the re-examination procedure started on 22 September 2009.
Re-examination procedures referred to in Article 19(1).
During its meeting of 14-16 May 2013 the CVMP appointed K. Törneke as rapporteur and K. Baptiste as co-rapporteur for the re-examination procedure.
The re-examination procedure started on 11 February 2014.
PRAC considered the detailed grounds as submitted by the MAHs within this re-examination procedure and the scientific data underlying these grounds.
The re-examination procedure started on 15 September 2009.
The CVMP conclusions relating to the specific products that were the focus of the re-examination procedure are reflected in Annex II(Scientific conclusions) of the CVMP opinion.
The re-examination procedure started on 15 April 2009.
During its meeting of 9-11 April 2013 the CVMP appointed Prof. C. Friis as the rapporteur andDr M. Holzhauser-Alberti as the co-rapporteur for the re-examination procedure.
For the re-examination procedure the PRAC confirmed its previous position.
Based on the totality of the data available on the safety and the efficacy of diacerein, andconsidering all the risk minimisation measures proposed during assessment and the re-examination procedure, the PRAC concluded that the benefit-risk balance of diacerein-containing medicinal products remained favourable in the symptomatic treatment osteoarthritis, subject to changes to the product information and conditions.
Re-examination procedure under Article 32(4) of Directive 2001/83/EC, as amended.
In conclusion, further to the initial assessment and the re-examination procedure, the CHMP maintains its initial opinion that the benefit-risk balance of this medicinal product is not favourable in both of the proposed indications.
The re-examination procedures should be amended to provide a better guarantee for applicants' rights.
As stated in Article 62(1) paragraph 4 of Regulation(EC) No 726/2004 and Article 32(4)paragraph 3 of Directive 2001/83/EC,“the re-examination procedure may deal only with the points of the opinion initially identified by the applicant/MAH and may be based only on the scientific data available when the Committee adopted the initial opinion.” Therefore these scientific data can not be considered during the re-examination procedure. .
The re-examination procedure shall deal only with the points of the assessment report identified by the applicant in the written notice.
To this end following the abovementioned re-examination procedure, the Commission shall adopt implementing decisions, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 28, after notifying the Member States as well as the third country concerned at least two months in advance.
The re-examination procedure may deal only with the points of the opinion initially identified by the applicant and may be based only on the scientific data available when the Committee adopted the opinion.
In conclusion, further to the initial assessment and the re-examination procedure, PRAC maintains its conclusion that the benefit-risk balance of the human plasma derived and recombinant coagulation Factor VIII containing medicinal products remains favourable subject to the agreed changes to the product information(section 4.4, 4.8 and 5.1 of the SmPC).